Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 701 through 750 (of 808 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Does Neturei Karta have a point? #843724
    yichusdik
    Participant

    OK, mods, I’ll put it another way, without accusation. How can anyone see the manner in which HKBH has acted and used and blessed not just am yisroel but the world through the State of Israel and still consider it the wellspring of evil it has been accused of being here?

    Thank you. That’s much better.

    in reply to: Does Neturei Karta have a point? #843722
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Enabled the creation of one of the most innovative countries in the world, inspiring its scientists and engineersand doctors to change and save millions of lives. Given his zroah netuyah to make the IDF one of the most formidable armies in the world only decades after their being utterly defenceless (also his will). Saved the country and every resident in it from dozens of ballistic missiles. Brought about through his nisim using the heads and hearts of Israel the beginning of kibutz goliyos from Arab countries, Ethiopia, the USSR in the face of violence, antisemitism and starvation. Provided through his bounty and his blessing the infrastructure upon which the largest number of bnei Torah are able to learn in the largest number of yeshivos and kollelim in the history of am Yisroel.

    Not one single element of this happens in a vaccum. This was brought about by hakodosh boruch hu and continues to be so, along with his continuing rotzon for us to improve and perfect it, as we must improve and perfect ourselves.

    edited. Sorry, you can’t accuse people of that.

    in reply to: What's the argument against having a Madina? #852363
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Please read Eim Habonim Semeichah for a chareidi perspective on this that is positive about Zionism and the creation of a Medinoh, written by Reb Yissochor Shlomo Teichtal HYD in the years and months before he was murdered by the Nazis YSh’vZ.

    in reply to: US Troops urinate on dead Taliban #843273
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Desecrating the corpses of one’s enemies is sickening. The Iraqi Al-Qaeda did that to Americans in Fallujah in 2004. I don’t think anyone thought that was passably OK. That said, I would offer a few observations:

    1. In the past, things like this, or worse, hacking them up and displaying them, was done, as the French say, “pour encourager les autres”, to have a hashpo’oh on others, i.e. to instill fear. As this was not used in that way, and as a Taliban will be more scared by an M1 Abrams tank or an F-16, it serves no practical purpose as well as being sickening.

    2. At other times in history, such desecration had a religious undertone (e.g. Aztecs desecrating the corpses of Cortez’s soldiers during the battle for Tenochtitlan in 1521) and were part of an avodah zara ritual. Also sickening, but not what these soldiers were doing.

    3. What I can not agree with is the cynical description of this action as “inhuman” by President Karzai of Afghanistan. Beheading aid workers and journalists is inhuman. throwing acid in the face of women who go to school is inhuman. Stoning women to death who were the VICTIMS of an oson is inhuman. This? This is wrong, very wrong, but altogether too human of these young desensitized soldiers to have done.

    in reply to: Rav Elyashev Bans Nachal Chareidi #848512
    yichusdik
    Participant

    CG, while I agree with you that whatever it is, the Eidah and its allies are something more than microscopic, I must take issue with you on a number of levels. First, you talk of “typical Zionism”. Do you really think that there is no difference between the Zionism of yeshiva bochrim at Mercaz Harav and chiloni kibbutzniks in the Galil? Or between the Zionism of Orthodox officers like Palsar Nachal platoon commander Daniel Mandel HYD who gave his life capturing an Al Aksa terrorist in 2003 and the Zionism of the bartender at Mike’s Place in Tel Aviv? There is tremendous difference even though there are some commonalities.

    One of those commonalities, and one that they share with millions of Jews around the world, frum and not frum, Zionist and not Zionist is not that they see the Edah as microscopic – it’s that they see the Edah as irrelevant to mainstream Jewish life and mainstream frum life except when they are seeking headlines by stoning cars, Police, and buses, or dressing their children up in stripes and yellow stars, or, occasionally, when they come to Diaspora cities as meshulochim. One cannot build a society and a reputation on cutting themselves off from the tzibur and then expect the tzibur to listen to them or be beholden to them. But they don’t seem to understand that. I spoke with one meshuloch who told me he can’t understand why he has fewer and fewer consistent givers in chutz laaretz, among the whole spectrum of the community, even from the very frum, even after being told that there is blowback from the actions of the Edah.

    in reply to: Rav Elyashev Bans Nachal Chareidi #848473
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Well, Mdd, you are welcome to stop your diatribe any time. I am sure that there are people on a madreiga to make a macho’o. I’m not one of them. Neither, I suspect, are you, nor are the vast majority of us. But know this. The kind of “response” and discussion you are looking for, and the only one acceptable to you it seems, is for someone to accept your point of view as the only legitimate one. If that kind of thinking prevailed in our mesorah, we would have no mishna or gemoro, because no one would ever disagree. We would have no Rambam and Raavad. We would have no R’ Yaakov Margoliyos and Rav Yehudah Mintz. No R yaakov Emden and R Yonasan Eybeshutz. That is not how our tradition works.

    in reply to: Rav Elyashev Bans Nachal Chareidi #848460
    yichusdik
    Participant

    “be modeh al haemes”

    In the last 2 days, mdd, you have repeatedly castigated me, my hashkafah, my direct reading of the pshat in both the Torah and the Gemara (without offering an alternative direct pshat, instead depending on inferences that support your position), you called a vort of the Netziv modernishe kabala, and you dismissed the entire possibility that someone who doesn’t share your hashkofo could possibly have an alternative point of view that has some justification.

    You injected the description of Rav Adas actions as being motivated by the issue of modesty, but such a word or description is not there on the Daf, and as you conceded the meforshim don’t discuss the issue. I looked a fourth time this morning.

    The emes is that your arguments are unconvincing. That’s OK. You are entitled to infer or interpret as suits you. As a side note, Rav Eliyahu Abergil, who heads the beis din in Beer Sheva, found sources (I’ve only seen a quote of his work, not the sources themselves) that describe a karbolta, the head covering worn by the woman in the Gemoro, as something associated with idol worship. Not an issue of tznius. In that case, IF she was thought to be a Jewish woman in public displaying the accoutrements of and thus encouraging avodoh zoroh, I understand better why he ripped it off of her head, and I can see it taken as the kind of example that needed action. Again, a Rav Ada or a Pinchas Hakohen is on a madrega to do such a thing.

    I guess the words elu voelu divrei elokim chaim have no meaning to you. Well, they do to me. My g(x8) uncle R. Shmuel Shmelke of Nikolsburg encountered many angry Yidden who disparaged his hashkofo, and tried to run him out of town and his position through many of the same overbearing tactics. Didn’t work. And it won’t work.

    in reply to: Rav Elyashev Bans Nachal Chareidi #848452
    yichusdik
    Participant

    I’ve reviewed the daf three times in the last 24 hours. I know that he mistook her for a Jewish woman. The gemoro brings his action as an example of someone prepared to sacrifice for what he saw as kovod shomayim. this act was brought as an example. You are extrapolating praise. It is not in the pshat in the gemoro. The idea of being prepared to sacrifice is considered a lost positive trait that earlier generations had, yes. But this act had neither praise nor condemnation. And there is much, much more about Rav Ada’s praiseworthiness from other mekoros, like the one in taanis i mentioned, or the story of how Rav Huna brought him with to a wine warehouse he thought was on the verge of collapse simply because his virtue would keep the building from falling. You are inferring more than is in the text, and the meforshim on the daf are silent.

    in reply to: Rav Elyashev Bans Nachal Chareidi #848450
    yichusdik
    Participant

    MDD, The gemoro illustrates his readiness to stand up for what he perceived as kovod shomayim. It does not say that his action, his error in knocking the headdress off of a non Jew that cost 400 zuz in fines, was in and of itself praiseworthy. Rav Ada’s praiseworthiness is found in his actions listed in Gemoro Taanis.

    in reply to: Rav Elyashev Bans Nachal Chareidi #848441
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Really? you need a source for common sense? Would you rather say that one can be confident enough in his own tzidkus to give toichecha like Rava Ada while behaving like Resh Lakish before his tshuva?

    in reply to: Rav Elyashev Bans Nachal Chareidi #848436
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Sorry, that’s daf chof omud beis.

    in reply to: Rav Elyashev Bans Nachal Chareidi #848435
    yichusdik
    Participant

    I am doing neither. It isn’t my place to do so, and the gemoro makes clear his tzidkus in other places. What I am saying is that to take him as an example of how to behave, one has to take on the conduct that made him praiseworthy. That is listed in gemoro taanis daf chof omud alef. As I said, if someone is on that madrega, they can do as he did.

    in reply to: Rav Elyashev Bans Nachal Chareidi #848432
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Funny thing about the gemoro, MDD, you can look it up. Rav Ada Bar Achava ripped a red headdress off of a non Jewish woman, thinking she was a Jew. He was fined 400 zuzim for doing so. It doesn’t praise him or condemn him. I looked on the daf and the meforshim say nothing more about the matter.

    But if you are such a chosid of Rav Ada Bar ahava, perhaps you will recall his argument with Rav Huna about if it is permissible to cut the peyos of a koton. He said yes it was, Rav Huna said no. When he found out Rav Huna’s wife cut their children’s peyos, he felt that was against Rav huna’s shitoh, and said something to the effect that she should be careful or she might end up burying her sons, and Tosefos says he didn’t mean to curse them, but they died young. Are you on his madreiga? even such a tzadik as Rav Ada said something he regretted. But really you should look at the gemoro in taanis, where he describes why he was zoche to live long. If you meet his criteria, my (red) hat is off to you and you can emulate him. If not, stick to Hillel. go and learn.

    in reply to: Rav Elyashev Bans Nachal Chareidi #848429
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Doswin, he said my words were, and my words were a literal reading of the posuk. And, by the way, I think there is a time and a place to be moche. If someone is a responsible, adult part of your kehilo, and has given reshus to be rebuked – implicitly or explicitly, then I can see it having its place. But to a kid? to someone with a different Rov and a different daas Torah? To someone who doesn’t even understand the concept of daas Torah? That is wrong, misguided, and pointless, and encourages those few seculars who have as little understanding of the concept of sinas chinom as do those few chareidim who have been in the news.

    in reply to: Rav Elyashev Bans Nachal Chareidi #848425
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Wow, MDD, first time I’ve had a direct quote from the Torah called a modernishe zach. There’s a first time for everything I guess.

    Even assuming your absurd notion that the Chofetz Chaim would have countenanced the abuse of an 8 year old frum girl, or the throwing of stones (on shabbos) at mechallelei shabbos who are avadeh tinokos shenishbu, or the screaming at a woman seated at the front of a bus, you outdo yourself with your kano-us. Don’t forget, there was more than one person or group called kanoim in our history. There was the kanous of Pinchas, which it would be total azus metzach to assume you are on the madreiga to emulate, and then there is the kanous of the zman churban bayis shaini, exemplifying the outcome of the sinas chinom that destroyed the beis hamikdosh. You may want to be a kanoi like Pinchas, but you sound like a kanoi from the time of the churban.

    And BTW, you know that the person you are yelling at is sinning intentionally, how? Does this also apply to children, who have been yelled at as you paskened is mutar, if not always “wise” for months in Beit Shemesh? Are they even of age to be a meizid in anything? And is their parents “sin” appropriate to be moche because they don’t have the same daas Torah as you do? It keeps coming back to sectarianism. We don’t need to worry about the seculars or the reform or the reconstructionists, because before they can do their damage to klal Yisroel, you will have written off (and yelled at) the 75% or more of the orthodox world who holds by a different shitah than you.

    You know, you talk about me inventing modernishe reasons. I’m talking about learning a 2000 year old lesson that you are willfully ignoring. Nothing modern about maaseh ovos simon libonim. Smart people, smart Jews, learn from their mistakes, or those of their forebears. You should try it some time.

    And no, MDD, you aren’t going to browbeat me into silence like has been done to others on many threads when they seem too unlike you and your confederates in their thoughts and words. And I say this because I love you and every other Jew and it pains me to read words so full of anger and such readiness to pounce on another Jew’s perceived shortcomings. It is time to remember what Hillel hazoken said about Veohavto loreacho komocha. All the rest is commentary. Now go and learn.

    in reply to: Rav Elyashev Bans Nachal Chareidi #848413
    yichusdik
    Participant

    mdd, I’ll pardon your ignorance. It’s not kabbalah. It’s a famous vort of the Netziv, and it’s also referenced in the Yerushalmi maseches Sanhedrin. And as far as Toichecha goes, the mekor is in vayikro. Lo tisneh es achicho bilvovcho. Hocheach tochiach es amisecho, velo sisah olov cheit.

    “Do not hate your brother in your heart, you shall surely rebuke your neighbor, and incur no sin because of this person.” two things in that posuk which take YOU out of the parsha of giving toichecha. First, there is the fact that to validly give toichecha, you can’t hate your brother in your heart. Judging only from what you have written in this forum, you don’t display that qualification. Secondly, the posuk says “es amisecho”. You want to give toichecho to people who are not your friends or neighbors, who you see as out to destroy your way of life, who in your view are annihilators of Torah. In what twisted world do you think you can consider those people “amisecho”?

    Really, MDD, basic stuff.

    in reply to: Vacation on a budget #841204
    yichusdik
    Participant

    smart, I had my family including four kids as well as in laws at a spacious townhouse with four bedrooms. also a private pool in the back but it was tiny. 10 days was abt $1000. less than a 10 minute drive from the gates back in 07. google windsor hills

    in reply to: Rav Elyashev Bans Nachal Chareidi #848396
    yichusdik
    Participant

    mdd, Pinchos ben Elazar took two lives – of a Jewish sinner and a non Jewish woman not bound by torah; he did it knowing with the ruach hakodesh he had that it was a seminal turning point, and that Moshe Rabeinu was not in a position at that moment to stop the sinning among b’nei Yisroel. He willingly gave up that part of the neshomo that is torn when one takes a life, even for a valid reason. HKBH granted him a special brocho, of shleimus, which he had given up, “hineni nosain lo es brisi sholom” to make him complete once again. Do not presume for even a second to be on the madreiga of the grandson of Aharon, of one of the holiest people who ever lived. Do not presume to have the insight or the hashpo’os that he had that informed his decision making. Do not presume that because he was a kanoi, it is a free pass for anyone who believes he is upholding torah to do anything they feel they should. That is a base misuse and abuse of Torah.

    in reply to: Rav Elyashev Bans Nachal Chareidi #848389
    yichusdik
    Participant

    shmoolik – that is what this is about. all of it, from the mehadrin bus lines to nachal chareidi to the internet to lipa shmeltzer to beit shemesh assaults on 8 year olds. it is ALL about control. Control may be a good thing, if you believe that ol malchus shomayim beins being tachas ol avreichei gedolim, or to be dan lcaf zchus tachas ol gedolai Torah themselves. And the reason so little has been said on these issues, especially the most recent terrible images, is that even though their means are violating Torah, the ends that the rioters want are exactly the same as Daas Torah, as it defines itself or is defined by its yoatzos, so how can they appear to be against outcomes they desire – those being control over the hearts and minds of the chareidi velt- even if the means are abhorrent? Truly there is no simple answer for them, as they see actions that are terrible to achieve outcomes they ultimately want.

    Control may also be perceived as a bad thing, and those who want no control at all over any yetzer put themselves outside frumkeit.

    My preference is l’chatchila SELF Control, as learned in the system of Torah values we cherish; when you need guidance, though, you must seek it, as the mishna says Asey Lecho Rov. The authority doesn’t appear from thin air – you make it. And it must suit YOU. The mishna doesn’t say Asey LOHEM Rov. Don’t tell others what is das vodin, unless they have taken on the same daas torah as you, and given up their choices to a guide who exercises control as you have done.

    in reply to: Rav Elyashev Bans Nachal Chareidi #848367
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Right, health. Rav Shach zt’l agreed with you so much about hakoras hatov and the medina that he paskened to fly the Israeli flag atop ponevitch every yom haatzmaut. get over yourself. elu voelu divrei elokim chayim. enough already with bashing everything and everyone who doesnt think like you. It’s getting tiresome.

    in reply to: Would you ever withhold a ??? #962585
    yichusdik
    Participant

    With all due respect to you, mdd, you may indeed know halocho better than oomis or me or anyone else. And, as a man, and as someone who has been in the parsha, you are right, sometimes a woman has a right to demand a get, and sometimes not. But that has nothing at all to do with the yashrus and the right choice of the man giving the get. He is either glach or he isn’t. But coming back to you, you may be a boki, or an illui, or both, but it has nothing to do with your gender.

    in reply to: Gross Anatomy #844284
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Just peeked in on this. Wolf, I don’t think anyone else got the gross reference. For all of you who didn’t, one gross = 12*12=144.

    in reply to: Would you ever withhold a ??? #962561
    yichusdik
    Participant

    My marriage recently ended, and at the outset of the separation things were pretty ugly. Nonetheless, and after working on reconciling for a number of months, and finally determining the marriage was over, I gave the get and would never have held it over her head, even if I had had to fight tooth and nail in beis din, court, or anywhere else for my rights (b’h didn’t work out that I had to). It is just wrong and flies in the face of everything that I believe about yashrus and treating a fellow human being, even one I couldn’t live with anymore, with respect. It would have been a terrible lesson to our children, who are old enough to understand the implications of withholding. My relationship with them and the respect I hope they will have for me is worth more than the leverage a get presents. I can see no valid reson for withholding a get. If there arte circumstances where the woman is acting in a cruel and manipulative way, there are other, better means to fight, that don’t compromise the conscience or dishonour the soul.

    in reply to: Xmas and Christians #838091
    yichusdik
    Participant

    The man’s name was jesus – just a name. using the other part together with it that means in Greek “anointed one” gives him a title, and that could be construed as a recognition of the way in which they regarded him contrary to Torah, and therefore should not be used. The historicity of this man is still in dispute, and even in our own traditions there is machlokes if he was the same yeshu who the Gemara wrote about or if that one lived a couple of generations earlier. not pashut. The book that was a collection of all Jewish traditions about him, called Sefer Toldos Yeshu, included every story, anecdote and legend about him and his followers, embellished as generations went by and his followers (or more accurately, the followers of the meshumad Paul, who is the biggest villain in all of this) became more powerful and more cruel, does not exist anymore and is only known through quotes and excerpts.

    As far as the greeting goes, I don’t get too exercised about it. People are genuinely making an effort (for the most part) to be a bit kinder or friendlier around this time. I’m not going to make a scene of Jewish entitlement by expecting their friendliness to conform to my worldview, and I won’t give them a greeting in return that is meaningless to them.

    in reply to: Minhag of not saying Tachnun issue #1140306
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Galitzianer chassidishe minhag in my family, not to say. All the Litvishe and Yeshivishe and BT from Litvishe orgs notwithstanding, still do so, unless I am the Shliach tzibur in a place where they do say, in which case I do like the minhag of the tzibur

    in reply to: should parents stay together for the children? #835666
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Speaking from unfortunate personal experience, he and his wife should do their best to get help for themselves individually and as a couple. They should make every effort to make the marriage work. With rare exceptions (like physical abuse)No marriage falls apart solely because of one partner. And it does impact the kids. But I can tell you that it also impacts the kids if the parents fall deeper into animosity and blame within the marriage. So when all efforts have been made, it is my experience that they should split. My relationship with my kids has got better, not worse since we did so.

    in reply to: The Maccabeats #834889
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Moishy, Ironic it sounds more goyish – this year they did a cover of “Miracle” davka about chanukah, word for word, no need to change the lyrics, that was put out by Matisyahu (who may not be your flavour of frum, but davening, tzitzis wearing, shomer shabbos and kashrus, full of ahavas yisroel frum) last year. It is actually the most Jewish song they covered yet.

    in reply to: Anyone ever hear of a Simchat Bat? #834711
    yichusdik
    Participant

    kfb – and the last one I was at was a friend who is the son, Grandson, and Great Grandson of a well known Moroccan Rabbinic family. The fact is anyone who has an agenda will imbue whatever they are doing religiously with that agenda, and anyone who is doing something religiously lishma will do so even if it is a new or distinct thing. It depends on the person, not the concept.

    in reply to: Anyone ever hear of a Simchat Bat? #834687
    yichusdik
    Participant

    As someone with roots among the earliest proponents of chasidus, leaders who tried to integrate many of its principles into the kehilos they led (with mixed responses), I feel, RSRH, that you put it succinctly and beautifully. Popa, you are right as well, that sometimes these Hegelian movements within Yiddishkeit end up with a synthesis that is unacceptable…but sometimes they flower and enrich all of klal yisroel, like chasidus has done. Perhaps we are seeing a moment like that now, and our responsibility isn’t to stifle such a movement, but rather to influence it so that it stays within the boundaries of Halocho. That won’t be accomplished through denigration or calling it apikorsus or amaratzus or reform.

    in reply to: DO NOT JUDGE PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!! #916131
    yichusdik
    Participant

    What truly troubles me about this issue is that the same people who would ask their Rov before changing from a half windsor to a full windsor knot in their tie feel it is perfectly all right to judge and give tochacha and perhaps even talk in public or private about someone else’s halachic challenges, be they in tznius or anything else. Why is it necessary to get Rabbinnic guidance on minutiae but fly solo on something that could make one oiver hamalbin pnei chaveiro brabim, among other issurim?

    in reply to: Anyone ever hear of a Simchat Bat? #834660
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Derech, while I respect the way you stated your perspective (not, like some others here, determining that “the other” is worthy of denigration) even though you disagree with their actions, I think there is a fundamental issue at play here, and a serious one, that you illustrate. One perspective is that not only are the general structures and many pratim of our daily lives circumscribed and detailed to the smallest iota by our mesorah, but our thoughts, intentions, and expressions of joy within holocho are as well, down to the tiniest details. I accept that many people, many communities, see that as the only way to live their lives, and the best way, according to their understanding of the mesorah. I would ask, though, how does such an environment deal with change? I’ll take something simple. A heimishe family dpoesn’t often have the opportunity to eat out of the home, at a restaurant. For many of our families, being large, it is an impossibility. One of the ways in which our families have been able to afford this is the growth and popularity of pizza among heimishe communities. Now, you know and I know that pizza is and was completely foreign to the conveyors of our mesorah less than 100 years ago. You and I also know that there is plenty of detail in terms of holocho and minhag that guides what and how we eat in detail. And yet, it is a rare kehila or community indeed that bans pizza as minhag akum, or ‘past nisht”. I know, I know, this is a simplistic example. But truly, it speaks to the issue. It doesn’t violate holocho. Eventually, Rabonim got their heads around it to the point of making determinations of how many slices require a mezonos and how many a hamotzi. It didn’t need to be a michshol simply because it was a chidush. This leads to my point. As I wrote earlier, I got and aliyah, named my daughters, made a kiddush in shul. I have my own minhag which I am comfortable with. But if there is at least some precedent; if the activities are within the boundaries of halocho, even if they are different than some minhagim; if the event is done lesheim shomayim and with real hakoras hatov to HKBH; is it against halocho to do it? And further – what are we doing investing generations of time, money, resources and sweat creating mosdos and places where our kinderlach learn how to learn, learn how to find teshuvos, learn how to apply what they learn to their lives, if we are just going to tell them to as their LOR what colour shoelaces to wear, or which side of a table to sit down at? What was the point of all of that effort if we and our children won’t be expected to use our seichel and our capacity to find guidance in the massive canon of halocho to help us make decisions in our lives?

    in reply to: Anyone ever hear of a Simchat Bat? #834641
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Charlie Brown – I am well aware that ECHO was started by and is run by frum Jews. The doctors that are part of the network, who are willing to seek out a colleague at the drop of a hat, include Jews of all backgrounds, and those who would malign a thing because of the participation of Jews who are reform or otherwise not frum would be hypocrites if they used a network like ECHO. That was my point in bringing it up.

    in reply to: Anyone ever hear of a Simchat Bat? #834602
    yichusdik
    Participant

    H mom,

    Frum Mothers give brachos to their kids every Friday night – Yesimcho… Doing so in this environment you describe as outside of the parameters of Halocho…how, exactly?

    in reply to: Anyone ever hear of a Simchat Bat? #834589
    yichusdik
    Participant

    At first I thought I could scarcely believe what I was reading. But then I realized – this is exactly what I should expect.

    Heimishe Mom, really? Sfardim have been doing it forever, but for you its amaratzus? I submit that amaratzus is ignorance, and you are displaying ignorance of the traditions of half of the world’s Jews. And that is what it is, precisely – a matter of minhag, or tradition, or lack thereof. It isn’t a violation of Halocho to say tehilim, or have a seuda, or to make a brocho or a mi shebeirach. On the contrary, it is a hiddur of the mitzva of bringing more Jews – Male and Female – into the world. You don’t want to do it, rather make a kiddush? Fine. No one is forcing you to do it. No one is passing judgment on your choice within halocho. Why on earth do you think you have the right or responsibility to pass judgment on someone else’s choice within halocho? Reform and reconstructionists participating in positive Jewish experiences IF they aren’t a violation of halocho bother you? Fine. I guess you’ll stop giving tzedoko, because they do. Lots, and often to frum and heimishe institutions. Or stop using Jewish medical referral networks like ECHO, which save heimishe lives every day, because they do, or they are among many of the doctors who are prepared to go to the ends of the earth for other Jews.

    You would question the frumkeit, you say? Of course you would. Every word of your response to this issue screams that your identity as a Jew is completely wrapped up in separating yourself from di andere, no matter if they are reform, reconstructionist, or simply have different minhagim than you. Someone ought to let you know that that is not what yiddishkeit is about.

    And before you ask, I have two wonderful daughters, (ba’h) and when they were born I named them with an aliya and gave a kiddush in shul. That’s my minhag. But I don’t consider those who follow other minhagim within halocho apikorsim, amaratzim, or feminists. I call them brothers and sisters. You ought to give it a try.

    in reply to: torah, bechira, choice #917822
    yichusdik
    Participant

    My Rabbeim and Roshei Yeshiva never responded to this question saying there is no real choice and everything is predetermined. That would be an essentially pointless existence. HKBH has no need for robots, nor could the concept that the world was created for our pleasure in doing avodas haboreh, if we weren’t choosing to do so. Rather, one explanation which I found most understandable was that HKBH knows the outcome of every potential choice each of us makes – each alternate possible world that flows from each choice, but HKBH does not know which of those choices we will make until we do so. This fulfills the idea of omnipotence, in that all possible outcomes are known, but also allows for the critical element of bechira, because which of those potential outcomes will happen is not pre-known.

    in reply to: Vancouver #829702
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Corey, my work has taken me to Vancouver several times over the years, most recently this past summer. You might want to speak to Rav Feigelstock, the Rosh Kollel @ Ohel Yaakov, or also Rabbi Rosenblatt the Rav @ Schara Tzedeck. Vancouver Hebrew Academy is an orthodox k-7 school, with a mix of yeshivish and MO kids. Speak to Rabbi Pacht. Pacific Torah Institute is the CC affiliate for boys. Rabbi Abramchik is the Rosh Yeshiva. Rabbi Pacht also started a high school for girls called Shalhevet a few years ago, I’m not sure it is still around. Orthodox community is maybe at most 2000 of the 25000 to 30000 Jews in the Vancouver area, including all parts of the orthodox spectrum, but I could be off base on that number.

    in reply to: Vancouver #829699
    yichusdik
    Participant

    The Vancouver community has a JCC, and the dairy restaurant there is called Nava, and is under BCK Orthodox hashgacha. There is an excellent meat restaurant closer to downtown called Maple Grill, also under BCK. THere are a couple of others, including a pizza place, but these two are the best. The community high school, King David, is next to the JCC. There are 2 or 3 Chabad centres, including one downtown down the block from the Holiday Inn, and another chabad affiliated learning centre upstairs from Maple Grill. Congregation Schara Tzedek is the large Orthodox shul, MO mostly, which also has youth programs and NCSY. THe Rabbi is very welcoming, as is the whole congregation. There’s also an orthodox shul in Richmond, I think called Eitz Chaim.

    The community is very nice. A couple of things to consider. Beyond the frum community there is a huge amount of assimilation and intermarriage. There is also alot of opportunity for kiruv.

    The city itself is magnificent – one of the most beautiful cities in the Western Hemisphere. But for anyone considering living there, be aware that real estate prices – especially in areas where much of the frum community lives – are three times higher than comparable property in other Canadian cities like Toronto, and way, way more than in US cities where real estate has declined in the last 3 years.

    in reply to: Is it wrong for bochurim not to learn all the time? #1122560
    yichusdik
    Participant

    It’s not wrong.

    Pirkei Avos, 2:2

    Rabban Gamliel ben Rabbi Yehudah HaNassi would say: Beautiful is the study of Torah with the way of the world, for the toil of them both causes sin to be forgotten. Ultimately, all Torah study that is not accompanied with work is destined to cease and to cause sin.

    Rambam Hilchos Talmud Torah 3:10

    Anyone who decides to be engaged in Torah [study] and not to work, and will be supported by Tzedaqa – this person desecrates God’s name – Chillel es Hashem

    And of course, we are commanded to be koveyah itim for studying Torah. The mashmo’us of being koveah time is that much of one’s time is not engaged in Torah, but in other pursuits, such as work, which are sanctioned and expected by halocho.

    This is not to say that those who have a skill and talent beyond the norm shouldn’t be learning full time – aderaba, they should be fully supported. But it does indicate that at least according to Rabban Gamliel and according to Rambam, it should not be the norm for every bochur.

    in reply to: racial harassment by charedi children #825988
    yichusdik
    Participant

    When the word “tolerance” is considered nivul peh, this is the result. And to think of the mesiras nefesh those ethiopian Jewish families had to get even one child out through Sudan, or on Operation Solomon; to think that the Ethiopian community accepted the shitos of many rabonim who said they needed to undergo a geirus lechumra; to think that we haven’t had enough abuse thrown at us over the ages, we need to throw some at our own brothers and sisters. This is being an or lagoyim?

    in reply to: college='OTD' #825691
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Narishkeit subjects – -can help you develop skills that are essential for your own success and for klal Yisroel. A “narishkeit” history degree helped me develop into a writer, and aside from my professional development, the Jewish (communal and heimishe) organizations I have written grants and proposals for have received the funding they need to teach, support, and develop their institutions and their communities. It may seem likel “narishkeit” until you realize that the dollars supporting the institutions you or your kids or your friends depend on often get where they are needed because of people who earned “narishkeit” degrees.

    in reply to: Zionism #1112773
    yichusdik
    Participant

    More of those with such an antagonism towards Zionism should read Eim Habonim Semeichah by Rav Yissachar Teichtal HYD. It’s not a modern orthodox perspective, its not a frei perspective, it is the work of a great, G-d fearing ehrliche Rov.

    in reply to: scary "off the derech" – need help #821647
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Health, I think it is incumbent upon everyone to be mekarev rechokim. And if you don’t know how, there are people and orgs from who to learn. And if you are afraid of the hashpo’oh of the not frum on your family instead of yours on them, you are saying to your parents and to the gedolim of the last 60 years that all of the mosdos and chinuch they built up were a waste of time and money.

    I think kiruv is the truest expression of veohavto loreacho komocho – and on that mitzvah there is no condition of ehrlichkeit on the part of the person you demonstrate ahavas chinom to. And I would direct you to the message of the famous story of R’ Shmuel Shmelke Horowitz M’nikolsburg (brother of my gggggg grandfather) and how he helped Hamelech Menashe – the epitome of rishus – enter Olom Haboh. Our responsibility to love and engage and foster the observance of even one mitzvah is constant and unending.

    in reply to: scary "off the derech" – need help #821644
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Health, I am in a very similar situation to you, though my ex is still maintaining some level of observance, and facilitates the kids doing so. But I have come to a completely different conclusion. It seems to me the factionalism and even elitism which you or I might understand, if not justify, contrasted with the open hearts and homes of those involved in kiruv, and the longer she lived in the frum world, the less she saw of the open hearts and the more of the less savory elements of frum society. It didn’t have a good hashpo’oh on her, and real problems can’t be conveniently explained away.

    I believe in kol yisroel areivim ze bazeh means each and every Jew, and we cant pick and choose who we are going to “allow” to take on one, ten, or all mitzvos – because choosing to help or facilitate observance is in practical terms choosing to allow or not.

    in reply to: Eating in Sukkah on Shemini Atzeres #899036
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Don’t know other people’s reason, but it’s minhag mishpachas Rashi not to eat in the sukkah on Shmini Atzeres. We just make kiddush.

    in reply to: The Ten Lost Tribes #818147
    yichusdik
    Participant

    I’d suggest two pieces of research. For the science, read Jon Entine’s Abraham’s Children, which looks at the DNA of Jewish populations and presents some startling information, and some that we already knew, just confirmed. FOr a look at possibilities rather than certainties, I’d suggest Simcha Jacobovici’s film Quest for the Lost Tribes. Simcha is a good filmmaker, and is also Observant – I’d say on the liberal side of Orthodox.

    in reply to: Jewish Population? #817986
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Sorry, EYY, that wasn’t fair of me. In my defense, however, I responded to the title of the thread, which is “Jewish Population” which includes everyone.

    in reply to: Jewish Population? #817985
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Ahhh, didn’t realize we weren’t following kol yisroel areivim ze bazeh…

    in reply to: Jewish Population? #817983
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Don’t know for sure about the US cities, but Toronto’s (Greater Metropolitan Area, including heavily Jewish Thornhill, just to the North of the city limits) Jewish population is about 185,000 to 200,000, and Montreal’s is about 90,000 to 95,000. This is from fairly reliable sources including the most recent federation studies from both cities. Los Angeles is said to have well over 500,000, and both Boston and Chicago have around 200,000 or a bit more.

    in reply to: Lubavitch #820055
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Wow, 600 kilo, the tziyonim are responsible for meshichist extremists now? What else? New Coke? The Roswell coverup? Global Warming?

    in reply to: Non Jewish Music… #819267
    yichusdik
    Participant

    Sorry to disappoint you, Feif Un, but Modzitser and other chassidishe musical traditions and nigunim were very heavily influenced by French military music, as Napoleon’s armies came through (and retreated through) the areas they were in in 1811-1812. Did you ever wonder why chassidishe nigunnim sound so much like marches? because they are marches. The French ” La Marseillaise” the national anthem, is used as a nigun still by Lubavitchers. There’s a sefer called sefer hanigunim that has much of these tunes. Many of them will sound somewhat familiar to classical music aficionados.

Viewing 50 posts - 701 through 750 (of 808 total)