Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
“you have no clue whether or not it’s relevant.”
Again, it doesnt matter. I may be wrong and you are really askign the best kasha ever posed on ywn.
I don;t know the answer nor do I care. It is completely irrelevant to my point.“what would be the most plausible explanation for such behavior?”
completely irrelevant to this (or that discussion) but just for fun:
Sefardim are often called Chacham, not so much Ashkenazim. Alternatively he forgot to cross reference his post with other posts he’s written, Veyesh omrim shnei AAQ’s haviNow your turn
What did I have for lunch yesterday?relax deep breathes. Your version of the conversation does not reflect reality
This is the actual one:
Participant: I suspect aaq didn’t answer my question because the answer will prove his hypocrisy.
Ubiq: not necessarily, there are lots of possibilities why someone wouldnt answer. perfect example. I think the question had no shaychus, I don’t know why he didnt answer
Participant well what do you think the answer is?
Ubiq : I have no idea. Yo uexpect me to know why a poster phrased things one way in one thread and’t“but perfect example of the one who knows the answer not answering but not because he’s escaping the truth.”
not quite. PErfect example OF there being many reasons why people don’t answer. You think you have the best zinger and you stumped him. I think it is a completely irreelvent question that doesnt deserve an answer (The thread is about welcoming people, you wrote a little tosfos asking a striha between word usage from a different (unrelated) post. I dont know why AAQ didnt answer, maybe he was stumped. Maybe he ddnt see it maybe he too thoight it was irrelvent to the thread)
My point is there are many reasons why people dont reply. This is a perfect example. Yo uthink its the best question, I think it is silly, irrelevant and distracting.
Note: Even If I’m wrong and it is a Great, relevant question It STILL doesn’t change my point, as my point is there are lots of reasons why people dont answer (Syag helpfully provided a few more excellent examples in this very thread)
That was the first hlf of my point. The Second half is even if you DID stump him, starting a new thread to gloat about it seems a bit petty. just pat yourself on the shoulder you are very very smart, print out the thread post in your fridgeLol I provide a long post, that you skip, and somehow I’m the one confused by long posts?
you’re funny.
But no youre not geoingt to get me to call you names. I am a patient explainer so I will helpI’ll keep this shorter, with a summary at the end. you should be fine.
“you could have simply said that my question didn’t prove anything.”
That is EXACTLY what I said.I don’t know why he didn’t answer as I said “I don’t know what he thinks”
I was responding that the fact that someone doesn’t answer doesnt mean you got them.
It could be They didn’t think it was a good or relevant point worthy of response (Like I think regarding your irrelevant comment there)
It could be they didn’t see it (Like syag claims she didnt in my post linked above)
It could be they lost interest, don’t want to get bogged down in a silly conversation (Like syag in this post)
Of course it could be that you “got them ” . Though even in that case, starting a new thread to gloat seems petty, You aren’t owed anything, ok you got him, you win mazel tov, it isnt that great a feat, do you plan to put it on your resume, “Was able to defeat a YWN poster”so to keep things concise:
your premise (that silence = defeat) isn’t true , and if it was it isn’t worth getting worked up about.with me?
Lol yes!
EXACTLY” I never saw your question.”
EXACTLY
See it does not necessarily mean “not answering a very simple question with nothing to lose when the answer has a 99.9% chance of showing the preacher’s hypocrisy is as clear an indication as they get that he’s fluff of baloney”sometimes, the person simply didn’t see it
other times, the person may have just lost interest
other times they dont want an endless back and forth that goes no where.“And don’t be insulted,”
I’m not, don’t worry not at all.
Im disappointed, since you changed too, but dont even see it.BTW how do you get replies up so quick, areyo connected to mods?
I reload the paage a few times, my comment isnt there than I repload again a minute later and mine and your follow up are thereSyag
who is that response to?
I assume not me,
since :
a. You ignore my replies (exhibit a above, dont worry I’m fine with it, as you aren’t very honest and what makes it worse is you have a better than thou attitude, at least I admit I’m snarky look at your comment. uch)
b. your comment in no way relates to me. Put in my place? in this thread? How ? by whom?
and c. “Moving on”? me ? that has never been my goalbut I cant figure out who else it is to
Participant
“which? the question for aaq? ”
Yes
“how can a question not make sense? the one I made here?”
no the one there
” how can it possibly not have shaychus.”
It isnt relevent to the discussion there. The discussion there was about welcoming strangers, Calling a sefardic Rabbi chacham or Rav has no relevance to that topic“AAQ doesn’t owe you anything”
uh…duh? there’s a reason this discussion is not taking place in b”d.You seem to think he “owes” you a reply.
In fact yo ustarted a new thread to bully him into replying“not every comment deserves a response”
thanks so much for repeating what I already said.”you are most welcome. thus your entire thread is pointless.
“having said that, if pointing out someone violates their own preaching is considered silly by aaq then I can’t fathom why”
whut?
“he frequents the coffee room. probably about half the comments boil down to something like this.”
Yep it happens big deal. Don;t let it get you down.“if that makes you think you got him”
not answering a very simple question with nothing to lose when the answer has a 99.9% chance of showing the preacher’s hypocrisy is as clear an indication as they get that he’s fluff of baloney.”Fantastic! You win!
And syag agrees, so you MUST be right*“you certainly didn’t owe me any response so what prompted you to flaunt your stupidity yet again?”
Pure enjoyment! Nothing more nothing less. I dont think I will convince you. I dont think you will acknowledge that you are contradicting your own premise (You said both not every comment deserves a response, AND “silence shows he is full of baloney”, you cant have it both ways
Actually you can, you can have whatever you want. )* I hardly engage with Syag especialy on politics for this very reason
see here
for my question “In this context what’s the difference between a book and a memoir? ”
No answer to the question
does that mean I “got her”? I sure think so. do I think it shows her hypocrisy? Absolutely.Do I get all worked up that it is “the worst social crime” and start a thread about it?
No, I showed she was wrong, big deal move on. She doesn’t have to say “Ok you were right”(Granted the comparisons are not EXACTLY the same, since my question there was directly related to the conversation at hand, yours was not)
Participant
Perfect example. You think you “scored a good point”
I think your comment makes absolutely no sense and has no shaychus to the topic at hand.
I don’t know what he thinksAAQ doesn’t owe you anything not every silly comment deserves a response. If he wants to engage in a silly conversation he absolutely can, if he doesn’t he doesn’t have to. If that makes you think you Got him. Gezunterheit pat yourself on your back.
I made a comment too, Am I “owed” a response? Of course not.
Although you are right, your better off not letting it bother you
nobody is hear to be convinced. You’ll feel better if you stop trying to convince anybody. stay here for your own sake , to flesh out your own ideas, to refine them rethink your previously held notions. Don’t worry about other people.
I assure You for every good point you think you “scored” that wasn’t acknowledged, there was one an “opponent” think was scored against you that wasn’t acknowledged.
There are posters who can see black and say white, I’ve hada poster literally redefine a word , saying he wasnt using a dictionary definition but some other “Definition” he dug up from the depths of the internet, misconstrued, cut half off of and said that was the defitnion he was using.
Thats the way it is, don’t let it bother you, Don;t view it as a “debate”
Health
Your post is anti Torah
As you say “Even though he should have removed his arm at the time of Floyd’s unconsciousness”
He didn’t he continued to kill his restrained unconscious victim.Why don’t you follow the Torah? You should call for Chauvin’s death
Unquestionably no
One of the defining characteristics of our people is Rachamanim and Gomlei Chasadim. When new frum practicing people move to your neighborhood it is wholly appropriate to welcome them, and goes against everything Jewsih to shun them since “wed don’t know you”
This story is very very rare, (and frankly missing many details) .
the “serious” breaches of halacha are minor and easily remedied . Big deal people who used him for pidyon haben should do another one, How many mezuzas did this guty write alread replace them (and at any rate unlike welcoming ot a community when purchasing STAM it IS appropriate to look into the sofer). Your worried about his dead wife?
Big deal, worry far more about pushing away people , that is a far greater problem.It isnt even close
Excellent thread
What emerges from all this is that according to the Troah the only Goy mentioned in this thread that deserves the death penalty is Chauvin.
He is the onyl one who killed anybody and no he was not authorized to do so, Yes Floyd resisted earlier but in the United States their is no blanket allowance for cops to kill people who resisted earlier (does nay country have such a policy?). If he accidently died while be subdued would be one thing. That is NOT what happened.
AFTER Floyd was subdued and cuffed Chauvin held him there (to ensure his demise? I’m not sure why else) And just to be sure he was dead he continued to hold him there AFTER Floyd was unconscious. It cannot be argued that Floyd was still resisting then.So to sum up Chauvin killed an unconscious Floyd. He was not authorized to do so.
According to the Torah Chauvin should be killed
The more relevant rodef in this case is Chauvin
Had a bystander killed Chauvin DURING his act of murder, while Chauvin was murdering his restrained, harmless (unconscious!) victim.
Chauvin’s killer would be fully justified, and no less a hero than Nicholas Reardon who saved another victim.Note: Although at the time Chauvin was a rodef, he is no longer one, killing him today would not be justified, don’t make the same mistake the OP made .
lakewhut
do you have a source for your contention that a rodef can be killed for the attempt 13 years alaet (or even 13 seconds after he is done “pursuing”) ?
“Yes she was pregnant”
she wasn’t . Yes there are articles that say that, but no contemporaneous ones do including the detailed police account, but regardless as I and you said pointing a gun at a woman is bad whther or not she was pregnant.
However that has exactly zero bearing on Chauvin’s murder of him 13 years later.
unless you can provide a source for this rule of “once a rodef always a rodef”
“Btw, I’m not him.”
Yes I know, but you quote him and give his words credence (“I believe it’s possible,”)
“You can post to him on his You Tube channel.”
I don’t have a question for him. I get it he can make stuff up, if wrong, people still believe him , and if he guesses right, people are impressed. Its a win win. People get a kick out of tricking gullible people.
I understand him completely.you confuse me
how don’t you see it .You say youre not sure when the deadline ends.
how is this possible. OVer a month ago (March 18) you quoted him as saying “within a month, Trump will be President again.”
Regardless when that month started, at thsi point it is over (since you said it over a month ago)
You want to extend his time “The same guy said it will be up in 15 days a few days ago.” fine. I’ll see you back here May 7 that is 15 days from now (Lets give the guy some wiggle room)At any rate though. This prophet who you give credence to.
Is he a deaf, a kid or crazy?You can kill a rodef 13 years after the event?
(and she wasn’t pregnant , doesn’t really change much but stick to facts)
Health
“The time is Not up yet!”
when is it up?
On 3/18/21 you said “One Goyishe Prophet said that within a month, Trump will be President again.
I believe it’s possible, but not probable.”When did that month (or 15 days start) ?
Health
You haven’t repeated yourself.
In fact you STILL haven’t replied t oa straight forward simple question.Whether I got the timing you meant right or wrong is completely irrelevant (I don’t listen to fake prophets I was going by what YOU said)
Bottom line is the prophet you quoted (and said you thought might be telling the truth) was wrong (exactly what dat you realized he was wrong doesnt change the fact that he was wrong)My question is when you though he might be right, did you think he was deaf, a child or Crazy?
“Maybe that Gemorrah is only by Jews, not by Goyim?!?”
Is that what the Gemara says?
And at any rate so that leaves a 4th possibility for me !It is great to see justice done
Occasionally the justice system works“Well one prophet I answered”
no you didn’t
Here is my question
you called these people “prophets”
you also said that the prophets are either “deaf kids or crazy”question about 2 prophets:
1) the prophet who correctly predicted that Trump will be impeached twice. Was he deaf a kid or crazy?
2) The prophet who you quoted on 3/18
that “within a month, Trump will be President again.”
This prophet was wrong. Is he still a prophet? Is he a liar?
At the time when you thought he was worth listening to, that he might be a real prophet.
given that prophets are deaf kids or crazy, At the time which did you think he was ?dovrosenbaum
well put. EXACTLY what I said
The historical tidbits, while very fascinating don’t really help our aspiring author.
The bottom line is today, in 2021/5781 Talmudic literature in languages other than Hebrew are not perceived as being serious.
Similarly comments that it shouldn’t be this way are similarly useless. I don’t think the author plans to singlehandedly change the current perception.
His question is simple how to sell books.
Comments that well once upon a time they would have been more mainstream or people should get over themselves and accept emes in any language, while true , aren’t helpful .bottom line. it is unlikely to become popular* among “many top yungerliet who are alumni of prestigious yeshivos” (their loss)
I think you will find more success marketing it to “non-top” bochurim and yungelit who are struggling a bitand/or
People out of yeshiva as a reminder to the lomdus they once appreciated back in the day. “Relive the glory days of yeshiva ” or something like that
*certainly not openly
“That leaves one Choice!”
That may very well be
At least you don’t have to reinvent wordsAnd So which one is Mike Lindel and the False prophets you kept believing so far ?
You call them “prophets” are they Deaf, Kids or Crazies?“But if their prophecy comes true – they are real.”
what if, hypothetically a person predicted that , I don’t know , say that the Supreme court will dismiss a case as moot. If that were to come to pass, would that predictor be a prophet?
AFAF
Health
“I got news for them – M. Lindel says Trump will be President this coming August!”
Is he the same wrong guy who you quoted as saying on March 18 that Trump would be President in a Month?
Or was that a different wrong guy?
“when”
mid 2010’s
“how”
Marketing / social media“Why”
Depends on the person, some are moved by his life , others by peer pressure, others by food Its a big planet there’s something for everybodystart the website
you can have several tabs for all potentially awkward situations
A tab for divorces, broken engagements, people who don’t have children, have children off the derech got firedNu tachlis,
so what step are we up to?“The reason that gun control works in other countries is because they don’t have a constitution that allows gun ownership”
1) Neither do we , at least not until it was reinterpreted in Heller. We can always just interpret it as it was originally understood for the first 200 years of its existence or so
2) Even if there was a constitution that allowed individual private gun ownership, that would have no bearing on whether “gun control works” or not.
It sounds like you are saying ok gun control works but we are “stuck” because of the constitution, but the constitution can be amended so this argument doesn’t make much sense“then make it mandatory for everyone to take it and carry a passport for it as well”
putting the side that no one is forcing you to take any vaccine you. You don;t want to gezunterheit (not literally obviously) but don’t force us to let you into our stores, shuls etc
1) Ok no problem (though I don’t have that power) I’m not sure how this is an argument for you
2) none of those 3 (not 4) diseases are currently pandemic, so the comparison today makes no sense
3) Again that just further ruins your theories. why DIDNT Obama make H1N1 mandatory in 2009 (when there was a pandemic) ? If the whole thing is just a nefarious plot to take away our freedoms why Didnt Obama do it? (I understand Trump was sent by Q to route out a secret Cabal or whatever you believe so he wouldnt steal freedom, but Obama?)English is not the new yiddish
As you correctly note “Yiddish was THE language of German and Eastern European Jews” (emphasis added) it was not the local language that Jews just happened to speak. It was THEIR language.
I agree it is incumbent on Jewish schools to teach English. and your last sentence is true as well (I am no exception) .
But the answer to your title is an unequivocal no“Why stop there what about the flu shot why should anyone be at risk from you”
Ok I give up, why should they be?
“. What about making vaccines for h1n1 and ebola and swine flu and bird flu and anything else so that no one is at risk from you.”
Excellent news! There is a vaccine for H1N1 (I had it in 2009), Ebola , Swine flu (H1N1 see above) AND bird flu (H5N1)
Its odd that you want vaccines for a list of diseases, some of which are the same and all of which already have vaccines.
It sounds like you don’t know much about vaccines
AAQ
“this link is yet unclear.”
Yes very. As I said in my post :
“It MIGHT BE unrelated to the vaccine. … time will tell…. it makes sense to pause this one while this is sorted out.”
Rightwriter
“Anyway there’s little to do in order to make you understand since you just aren’t capable. ”
Thanks, but I’m not looking for you to help me understand anything. You do not have an elementary understanding of hosw syudioies or evidence works, and arent even willing to listen.
What I am trying to do, is point out the gaping holes in your theories, and your blatant dishonesty.
Exhibit B: You say “Also I didn’t say anything about depopulation”
Yet on March 31 2021 at 11:33 AM you posted the following ” Bill Gates has been talking about depopulation for years especially “through vaccines”.” * you also wrote “But when a person who has been crying out for pandemics, depopulation and vaccines for so many years is now suddenly in charge of this whole project, it’s a bit concerning.”
* for the record, Like everything your write this isnt exactly true either
bill Gates said “Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%”As he explained elsewhere Vaccines lower infant mortality and “Amazingly, as children survive, parents feel like they’ll have enough kids to support them in their old age, so they choose to have less children,”
All the best!
rightwriter
As you can see if there is concern, the government says so. They recommended pausing the vaccine.
This shows the OPPOSITE of what you contend. There is no secret nefariosu plan to depopulate the world“Can’t be must be unrelated to the vaccine since there is no proof. ”
It might be unrelated to the vaccine. all 6 of these people (out of 7 million does given !) were young women where they taking OCP’s which are knwon to predispose to blood clots? If so does the vaccine exacerbate the risk or was it just bad timing. time will tell. but now when there are other vaccines available, it makes sense to pause this one while this is sorted out.“can be enjoyed by everyone from mesivta bochur and up.”
Can be enjoyed and will be enjoyed are not the same
I find it hard to imagine, such a sefer becoming popular among “many top yungerliet ”
I think you will find more success marketing it to “non-top” bochurim and yungelit who are struggling a bit
and/or
People out of yeshiva as a reminder to the lomdus they once appreciated back in the day. “Relive the glory days of yeshiva ” or something like that
just my 2 cents
“Now can we wrap this up, since it’s leading nowhere? ”
You can wrap anything you want to. I don’t know why you are so angry. All I’m pointing out is that there is not much demand for such an item and even if there were it would be impossible to implement to your satisfaction .
My pending post is wrong
There are an equal number of cardinal (counting) numbers. so the number of numbers and even numbers is the same (if you take a list of numbers, double each you now have a lsit of even numbers just as long as original list) .
nonthless there are different llevels of infinity
see “Some infinities are bigger than others” From cosmos as well as the excellent ted ed video on the “hotel infinity” paradox (linked to there)
Redleg
“something cannot be MORE infinite than something else.”
while we are nit picking that is not quite true
There are degrees of infinity.
For example there are an infinite number of Numbers and there are an infinite number of Even numbers.
yet there are more numbers than Even numbers.Then of course there are an infinite number of numbers BETWEEN any two numbers
The different degrees of inifnity are represented by aleph-0 aleph-1 etc
5T
He’s more likely thinking of the documentaries he has seen online. like ET and Men in Black
CA
it was excellent thanks for recommendingRabbi Reisman says very similar sentiments yearly, always worth hearing again.
It is a minhag Yisroel to criticize others especially when it makes you feel superior.
As a Rebbe of mine once says “ITs hard to be frum its much easier to be frummer”
So instead of working on ourselves we say
“Hey at least I’m better than all those going to ORlando who are don’t have the “therapeutic exercise” (whut?) of cleaning”or
“Hey at least I didn’t go to a Pesach program in Dubai that serves deer meat”Or
“Hey at least I’m better than the bitter yidden insisting they aren’t jealous of those in Orlando and that their way is better”ITs an old minhag
one I’m being mekayem right now“cannot wear a face mask due to a disability. Do I have to wear a face covering or mask onboard a Spirit flight?”
I didn’t check the website
but based on the information provided by a source you need to do the following things to board:
1) notify them 48 hours in advance that you will be requesting an exemption
2) complete a Spirit ADA Medical Exemption form or get a letter from a doctor dated 10 days before the flight. These Documents need to be presented 3 hours before the flight
3) get a negative Covid test within 24 hours of the flight.According to my source if you satisfy these 3 requirements you will not need to wear a mask. Otherwise you will if you choose to fly with them.*
Good luck and safe travels
*worth noting that this is the official company policy whether each individual flight attendant is familiar with the policy is an entirely different matter. I would print out their policy to show them and keep your doctors note, completed form and Negative Covid test handy
ywnjudy
I don’ t fully understand your gripe
1) Why do their need to be videos for all these things? If you are unsure thats ok ask if you cant ask your Rabbi, call a hotline, ask many of the online ask -the-rabbi sites,
2) why does EACH thing need its own video. Search “toveling electric appliances” there are hundreds of results. Why do you need a video for pizza maker, then one presumably for hot water urn, for sandwich maker, George foreman, Pannini press, Keurig, blender, Why do these all have to exist seperatly and why in video form?
Similarly a search for “cutting nails on chol hamoed” yields hundreds of results the second of which is a detailed guide to the laws of chol hamoed from the OU. why does it have to be in video form?3) Who is paying for the filming of thousands upon thousands of hours of video addressing every possible question someone may have, who is paying for storage, and organization of this ?
how much would you be willing to pay to have access to such a database? per question? unlimited monthly access?Lol!
“He’s on You Tube – if you’re interested in his Prophecies.”
no I am definitely not interested .
Thanks for the offerHealth
Thanks for providing new information
(I’m ignoring the previous post, since IT provided no new information just repeated the same debunked idea over and over I rpplied to it dozens of times you cant ignore my reply and expect me to keep repeating myself)
On this thread: https://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/democrats-cheated-biden-won-2
You wrote That it was ok for a “Goyish prophet” to say that “that within a month [from 3/18], Trump will be President again.” even though he says for sure because he claims to be a prophet.
I have lots of questions.
when by 4/18 (a month from the above post) Trump will not be President, will this prophet have lied? *
If I tell you I’m a prophet then my correct predictions, are no longer “lies of fabrication” because I’m a prophet who is qualified to make predictions correct? It is only because they were educated guesses (based on fact and reason) that they are “lies of fabrication” even if true. IS this correct?
*I am telling you this with as near certainty as humanly possible. That Trump will not be President in a month.
Is THIS another “lie of fabrication” of mine? (even if true)Health
“I believe it’s possible”
how? what do you believe is possible to happen that would result in Trump being President within a month?
Also did this prophet say “I think…” ?
“Who knows what you meant at that time?”
I meant that the supreme court would decline to hear the case . Which is waht I said, AND is what happened
I said it as clearly as I could: ““The case will not be heard” short succinct, to the point. and 100% accurate.
It was not a lie, as has been pointed out over and over.
It doesnt sound like you have any new information t oadd, nor are you willing to stop lying
When new information pops up (eg in Sydney Powel”s case) I will update you
Until then unless you would like to apologize for wrongly calling me a liar, Or would like to respond to my questions to help you understand why your “understanding” of “lie of fabrication” ifs at best faulty, Or If you have any new information to add, I’ll let yo uhave the last wordKnowing my costumers, this is goodbye for now (Yes this is a prediction and no it doesn’t become a prediction only becasue I labeled it as such)
“and your conclusion is correct that he must give a Get”
Even if no beis din has so required?
“Your saying “I was making a prediction”, came way before your post “The case will not be heard.”
yes
Still not following, why is a clarification “way before” worse than one that occurs later? (and yours only occurred becasue I called you out on violating the nonsensical rule you invented)
“It’s amazing how you can think that you Never did anything wrong”
Thats not true. continuing this conversation is wrong, and frankly crazy, but what can I do it is my guilty pleasure
” but the husband disagrees and believes that there is hope for reconciliation,”
not the case I mentioned. The case I mentioned was: “If the marriage is over, certainly if he has moved on and remarried a get should be given in (nearly?) all circumstances.”