ujm

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 2,551 through 2,600 (of 5,000 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: rambam v other rishonim #2087786
    ujm
    Participant

    It cooled off a lot sooner than a hundred years.

    ujm
    Participant

    Syag, there’s no hate involved in mentioning that the Zionist Entity is a Shmad State. It is simply stating the facts, regardless if the specific example was in error.

    in reply to: Solution to the Shidduch Crisis #2087766
    ujm
    Participant

    Yochi:

    If you are correct then there should be no Shidduch Crisis among frum boys, only by frum girls. Yet, there are a relatively large pool of older single boy. All of them should have been able to get married long ago, due to the tons of older single girls.

    By the way, the idea of dropping Cherem Rabbeinu Gershom is a viable option if the Gedolei Rabbonim agree it is a good idea.

    in reply to: Movies and Noshim. #2087356
    ujm
    Participant

    AJ: I know this person the same way you know your child. It absolutely was due to his blood pressure. There were no other issues.

    in reply to: 13 years in a cave #2087159
    ujm
    Participant

    akuperma: The Rebbe created Kiryas Yoel to be away from town.

    in reply to: pronounciation #2087158
    ujm
    Participant

    You cannot properly express pronunciations in written words only.

    in reply to: Movies and Noshim. #2087157
    ujm
    Participant

    AJ: I know it first hand from him. It is absolutely 100% true and accurate. He raised his blood pressure and he was deemed ineligible to serve as a result of “poor health” based on his blood pressure.

    Perhaps some draft offices were tougher. But the one he went to dismissed him.

    in reply to: Abortion vs Pimples #2087017
    ujm
    Participant

    “The view that we need to worry about the secular law infringing on halacha”

    Halacha says you can kill an intruder who comes in your home, on the spot without warning (unless it is your father.)

    Do you therefore insist secular law in all 50 states permit killing such a person, in order – as you said – “that we need to worry about the secular law infringing on halacha”?

    in reply to: Movies and Noshim. #2087015
    ujm
    Participant

    I personally know a frum person who seriously raised his blood pressure via artificial means before reporting to the draft office. The doctor there disqualified him from serving due to his blood pressure being a severe health risk.

    in reply to: 13 years in a cave #2087014
    ujm
    Participant

    Dr. Norman Lamm called Bnei Torah “cave-men”.

    in reply to: Shakespeare #2086725
    ujm
    Participant

    Do any mainstream Mesivtas today still teach Shakespeare?

    in reply to: Abortion vs Pimples #2086724
    ujm
    Participant

    Rabbi Breitowitz clearly said that the ONLY exception permitting abortion is if the mother’s life is in danger. Any consideration other than the mother’s life, he said, does not permit abortion for either Jews or gentiles.

    in reply to: Shakespeare #2086683
    ujm
    Participant

    CS: The most important question here is we need your assessment as to whether the OP is a troll?

    in reply to: Shakespeare #2086582
    ujm
    Participant

    The lady doth protest too much.

    in reply to: Reb Shayala Kerestirer #2086313
    ujm
    Participant

    Yekeshe? Where do they exist nowadays?

    in reply to: OOT personality is lost. #2086312
    ujm
    Participant

    AAQ: The frum community in America has migrated TO in-town cities, rather than away to the suburbs, as the goyim and secular have over the last 75 years. The frum concentrated over the last 50 years to moving into the NYC, Monsey and Lakewood vicinities — whereas the non-Jewish and non-religious Jews moved away from there, to spread out across the country. Even the cities with sizable frum communities have seen, on average, a net outflow from there to the “Big Three” frum population centers I mentioned in my previous sentence.

    in reply to: Abortion vs Pimples #2086310
    ujm
    Participant

    Amil, you are again being dishonest. I specifically referenced “when it is required to save the mother’s life.” I purposely did not state the ambiguous concept of “considers a mother’s health”. If having a baby will strain the mother’s mental health for the next 18 years, that is not a valid reason to kill the baby. Indeed, any reason other than to save the mother’s life should never permit abortion.

    Every single of the 50 states (plus DC) permit, under all state laws, an abortion when in its absence the mother will lose her life.

    in reply to: Cannibals #2086309
    ujm
    Participant

    Avira, even today it is practiced in places other than Africa?

    in reply to: Abortion vs Pimples #2086175
    ujm
    Participant

    Amil: The fact is that out of the 50 United States, not one state outlaws abortion when it is required to save the mother’s life. In other words, all 50 of the 50 states permit abortion if it is necessary to save the mother.

    That’s all that counts. The rest is commentary.

    Hopefully in the very very near future we will Im Yirtzah Hashem see states outlawing abortion in all cases other than when it is needed to save the mother’s life. For any other abortion illegally performed, we hope to see criminal penalties resulting in the so-called “doctors” or other practitioners committing that murderous crime locked up in prison for a very long time. And in state with courage and conviction will also imprison mothers who voluntarily choose to illegally obtain an abortion when her life was not in danger.

    in reply to: traffic in town #2086096
    ujm
    Participant

    “And if something comes up on the way, like spilling coffee on your shirt”

    Please don’t drink and drive.

    in reply to: traffic in town #2086095
    ujm
    Participant

    “And if something comes up on the way, like spilling coffee on your shirt”

    Please don’t drink and drive.

    in reply to: Abortion vs Pimples #2086062
    ujm
    Participant

    ubiq: If a pregnant woman is being executed by Beis Din, the Halacha is to abort the baby first?

    in reply to: Abortion vs Pimples #2085876
    ujm
    Participant

    provaxx, you’d be okay with the secular government enacting laws permitting public nudity, teaching public school children that the Aryan race is superior or even legalizing manslaughter, since Goyish laws have nothing to do with Yidden?

    in reply to: OOT personality is lost. #2085875
    ujm
    Participant

    AAQ: You’re describing the general American, secular, modern, migration patterns. But it isn’t very applicable or widely true for the Frum American community.

    in reply to: OOT personality is lost. #2085874
    ujm
    Participant

    Unzere marry a 17 year old first cousin…

    in reply to: OOT personality is lost. #2085824
    ujm
    Participant

    GHadorah: Is it hard for these hillbillies to find a shidduch?

    in reply to: trolls #2085823
    ujm
    Participant

    Marxist, non-trolls have always been the most dull, boring people ever.

    in reply to: Abortion vs Pimples #2085820
    ujm
    Participant

    er: Killing in self-defence is also permissible and/or mandatory sometimes. Do you therefore suggest that manslaughter/homicide be legalized, in order not to outlaw instances of self-defense that’s halachicly permitted/mandatory but illegal under secular law?

    in reply to: traffic in town #2085819
    ujm
    Participant

    Get a helicopter.

    in reply to: Abortion vs Pimples #2085754
    ujm
    Participant

    GHadorah: What’s the difference whether the unborn child developed through an involuntary action or  a party unknown? If killing an unborn child is an affront to G-d, certainly no less than thievery, idolatry, arson or manslaughter, then either scenario should be the same as far as it being impermissible.

    modified

    in reply to: trolls #2085774
    ujm
    Participant

    Avira, I’ve long ago suggested to him that he do exactly that.

    in reply to: OOT personality is lost. #2085743
    ujm
    Participant

    GHadorah: You consider being a ski instructor or farming goats to be one of the shpitz highest attainable achievements one can reach in life?

    Do these farm boys look for farm girl type shidduchim?

    in reply to: Abortion vs Pimples #2085742
    ujm
    Participant

    She has absolutely no right to kill herself. Even if she is not pregnant.

    in reply to: trolls #2085741
    ujm
    Participant

    commonsaychel is the Official CR Troll Buster. His word is first, last and final.

    Everyone is considered a troll until, and unless, commonsaychel gives a hechsher certifying you are not a troll.

    in reply to: OOT personality is lost. #2085501
    ujm
    Participant

    Avira, statistically, many more OOTers move In-Town than vice versa.

    in reply to: sudden death #2085448
    ujm
    Participant

    Was there a time in history when people stopped dying?

    in reply to: Shidduchem vs real estate #2085446
    ujm
    Participant

    Ever since the advent of “resumes” in shidduchim, a not-that-old phenomenon, girls have become like real estate to be traded and bandied about.

    Time to get rid of the resumes.

    in reply to: OOT personality is lost. #2085330
    ujm
    Participant

    I keep meeting many many in-towners who have OOT personalities. Most of them have been lifetime in-towners coming from very in-town families.

    in reply to: Cash Advance #2085125
    ujm
    Participant

    I know of many gemachs that give cash advance loans with 0% interest.

    Mi K’amchu Yisroel.

    in reply to: Abortion Decision – Less Retzicha in America #2085065
    ujm
    Participant

    No one’s trying to ban interracial marriages. Except, possibly, some quacks. No one serious. So stop with the fake scare tactics.

    And if illegal aliens don’t get a free education after breaking into the country, then they’ll be less incentive to illegally enter the country. Sounds like a good idea.

    in reply to: Abortion Decision – Less Retzicha in America #2084985
    ujm
    Participant

    No, they won’t reinstate Dred Scott. No need to engage in unrealistic scare tactics.

    in reply to: Bridge for sale #2084965
    ujm
    Participant

    I’m only interested in a bridge in Brooklyn.

    in reply to: Bridge for sale #2084856
    ujm
    Participant

    commonsaychel issssssss a trolllllll. The biggest trollllllll of the coffee room EVER. SUCH A TROLL!!!!!

    Trolley, Trollster, ________ (fill in the rest)

    in reply to: Husbands Rights & Responsibilities #2084662
    ujm
    Participant

    AAQ: I specifically referred to American/Western culture. Even though too much of that Gentile weltanschauung has most unfortunately infiltrated even some quarters of ours, as you often demonstrate first hand, you are deliberately confusing the Kesuba into an American culture that has no bearing on the point.

    in reply to: Reb Shayala Kerestirer #2084646
    ujm
    Participant

    Reb Shayala’s brother moved to New York. His Kever is in Staten Island.

    in reply to: The Violent Dems are at it #2084642
    ujm
    Participant

    If the author or publisher commissioned a crime to obtain this document, the author and/or publisher should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

    in reply to: Husbands Rights & Responsibilities #2084641
    ujm
    Participant

    “Dear Ujm,

    “must do her husband’s will” Please quote correctly.”

    Dear N0mesorah,

    Per your request, here’s the exact original:

    וְכֵן צִוּוּ עַל הָאִשָּׁה שֶׁתִּהְיֶה מְכַבֶּדֶת אֶת בַּעְלָהּ בְּיוֹתֵר מִדַּאי וְיִהְיֶה עָלֶיהָ מוֹרָא מִמֶּנּוּ וְתַעֲשֶׂה כָּל מַעֲשֶׂיהָ עַל פִּיו. וְיִהְיֶה בְּעֵינֶיהָ כְּמוֹ שַׂר אוֹ מֶלֶךְ. מְהַלֶּכֶת בְּתַאֲוַת לִבּוֹ וּמַרְחֶקֶת כָּל מַה שֶּׁיִּשְׂנָא. וְזֶה דֶּרֶךְ בְּנוֹת יִשְׂרָאֵל וּבְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל הַקְּדוֹשִׁים וְהַטְּהוֹרִים בְּזִוּוּגָן. וּבִדְרָכִים אֵלּוּ יִהְיֶה יִשּׁוּבָן נָאֶה וּמְשֻׁבָּח:

    in reply to: Husbands Rights & Responsibilities #2084614
    ujm
    Participant

    AAQ: You’ll notice that when the King is sovereign, his wife is entitled Queen Consort. But when the Queen is sovereign, her husband is not entitled King Consort. This is because the title of King, by definition, outranks the title of Queen.

    in reply to: Husbands Rights & Responsibilities #2084613
    ujm
    Participant

    AAQ: American/Western culture has absolutely zero to do with the Kesuba, Torah Judaism or with Klal Yisroel.

    in reply to: Bibi Netanyahu נ׳י #2084600
    ujm
    Participant

    User176, what are you referring to?

Viewing 50 posts - 2,551 through 2,600 (of 5,000 total)