akuperma

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 151 through 200 (of 3,447 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Gaza War of 2023-2024 #2268783
    akuperma
    Participant

    The subject line is VERY optimistic. We should be davening that it will be called “Gaza War, 2023-2024”, rather than something such as “Middle Eastern War” or “World War III”, and that 2024 will be the end date (and there will also be people around to record the end date.

    Similar to 1973, the Arabs surprised themselves with their competence. Had they followed through they would have seized much of the Galil, and the Iranians might have pulled off more than a limited harassment of Red Sea shipping.

    It still isn’t as long as the Israeli War of Independence, which sputtered along in 1946 and 1947, and then went full force in 1948-1949. Adjusted for changes in population, Israel would have to lose 80,000 soldiers to have equivalent losses.

    in reply to: Democrats Interfere with Elections #2268580
    akuperma
    Participant

    ” how any frum yid can vote for Democrat” – for 2024, the Republicans have turned into pacifists, appeasers and isolationists. Jews worldwide, and in particular the Israelis, benefitted from the generation of Republicans who led the free world against the “Axis of Evil” and pushed a “Freedom Agenda”, but it now appears those Republicans are now considered RINOs. The Democrat leadership favors the old Truman-Kennedy agenda of globalism are somewhat for Israel, though they may be losing ground to the “Progressives” and their agenda of WOKE anti-Semitism. It will be interesting to see the party’s platforms, the Republican VEEP candidate (isolationist MAGA fanatic or someone chosen to appeal to the Reagan Republicans), and if a strong third party opposed to isolationism emerges.

    in reply to: Democrats Interfere with Elections #2268543
    akuperma
    Participant

    The United States has a long history of interfering in elections to get the desired result. It is hardly a partisan matter. Sometimes they have arranged for leaders who get in their way to have bad things happen to them. Israel is unable to defend itself, and has accept “client’ status under American patronage, and should expect to do what is best for the Americans, not what is best for Israel. That is how world politics work. It sometimes called the “Great Game”, and we are at best some very helpless pieces.

    in reply to: Dubai, United Arab Emirates #2267839
    akuperma
    Participant

    The real bottom line is a great many Arabs do not wish to become of a rebuilt Iranian (Persian) Empire. The Iranian launched the war for fear of an alliance of Arabs, Americans, and to a lesser extent, Israel, against Iran. The Iranian goal is to convince the Islamic world that the leaders of the Arab countries (none of whom were elected) are corrupt traitors, and that the Islamic world should accept Iranian leadership. Defeating Israel would go a great way to establish Iran as the dominant Islamic power, and humiliating the western Christian powers by closing the Red Sea/Suez definitely helps. The first Arab countries to fall would be the small states along the Persian Gulf (they are rich, and very undemocratic, and their leaders will have much to lose if Iran takes them over).

    in reply to: Refuting the Three Oaths [Gimel Shevuot] #2266922
    akuperma
    Participant

    The question is moot (irrelevant) since the Palestinians demands have changed from a return to the 1914 status quo (which was tolerable to Hareidi Jews, since we are more interested in Torah and Mitsvos than political sovereignty), to a “River to Sea” Judenrein “final solution” on the Nazi model.

    Arguable had the Hareidim kept control of the Yishuv things would have been much better, no medinah, but also no holocaust, and a much larger Jewish community and a much frumer Jewish community in Eretz Yisrael, but the zionists won, and the British sabotaged the agreement with the Arabs (supported by the non-socialist zionists and the Hareidim) under their divide and conquer.

    However as Hamas, to the acclaim of Muslims and secular anti-Semites worldwide, made clear, their goal is genocide, so the three oaths are not relevant. And it is also clear, their goal is not limited to Eretz Yisrael, as the rising tide of worldwide anti-Semitism makes clear.

    akuperma
    Participant

    Nothing is certain. It should be noted that most Israelis are willing to fight for their survival, and most Americans are either “Reagan Republicans” or “John Kennedy/Harry Truman Democrats” (albeit in different parties) rather than MAGA or WOKE.

    Trump may turn out to using the threat of isolationism to encourage allies to get ready for war, and may then announce that what makes America great is leading the free world. Iranian reliance on American disinterest or incompetence will soon turn to fear (China and Russia will decide against invading their neighbors)

    The Democrats can decide to tell the “Progressive” (WOKE, and anti-Semitic, among other things) caucus to bug off – or if the Democrats turn left, while Trump stays isolationist, it will create an opening for a third party that will be globalist and not anti-Jewish. Either well the non-Trump party will also favor a strong military response to the Sino-Russian axis (which includes Iran and its clients).

    The Israelis could get their act together and be able to defeat their enemies without foreign aid – it would be messy and require the Israeli elite (secular, left, 1st world standard of living) to accept that they live in a third world country dominated by non-secular, non-Europeans, and a standard of living similar to the 1950s – but Israel could be militarily self-sufficient which the capability of deterring its enemies. If Israel could take out Iran, and neutralize Hamas and Hezbollah (which are Iranian clients), it would the from a position of strength attempt to negotiate with the Palestinians (who are the only Arabs who matter if Israeli wants to survive).

    Or the Zionists will go down in Jewish history along with Shabatai Zvi, has one very bad idea with disastrous results. The Hareidim will survive, as we always do, but most of the non-religious Jews (who outside of Israel have minimal birthrates already) will disappear. The best remembered Jewish leader of this era will be the original Satmar Rebbe, and people such as Herzl, Ben Gurion, and Netanyahu will be known only by historians interested in obscure tangents.

    in reply to: To those who refer to terrorists as “animals” or “beasts”: #2266678
    akuperma
    Participant

    They are soldiers of a de facto country who are not abiding by the international law on the conduct of armed conflicts, rules that are universally respected by all countries other than those engaged in wars. One shouldn’t regard them other than as soldiers. They are not beasts, deviants, perverts or criminals – they are soldiers who obey orders since they are good soldiers. Blame the ELECTED governments that command them.

    in reply to: Children are not here to “bring Nachas to their parents” #2265826
    akuperma
    Participant

    Of course children are here to bring nachas to their parents (and what great nachas is there in educating one’s children and watching them grow up). If this wasn’t Ha-Shem’s intention, we could be like reptiles who lay eggs, buried in a safe place, and the hatchlings that emerge are tiny adults with no need for parental guidance. But Ha-Shem decided on helpless babies who needs years and years of care to grow up.

    akuperma
    Participant

    While the impact of US aid on Israel may be very negative (since it results in Israeli weapons being manufactured by American workers rather than Israeli workers), it gives countries like Iran (and Russia) enough to worry about that they don’t go full force to conquer Israel. If the US loses interest it anything on the “right” side of the pond, it gives Iran (and Russia) a free hand to blockade Israeli ports (and Eliat’s access to the Indian Ocean and East Asia is not dependent on the American navy), and to use cruise missiles or even nukes on Israeli cities.

    in reply to: Trump throws Kurds and Ukrainians under the bus, will Israel be next? #2265082
    akuperma
    Participant

    I doubt Trump knows who the Kurds are, and I suspect Biden doesn’t either. They are fairly secular Moslems who are greatly annoying Americas enemies, as well as the Turks (who are American allies, at least nominally). Historically they have been friendlier to Yidden than the Arabs, Iranians or Turks.

    A weak United States will be unable to help Israel, and the combined effects of Trump and Biden, WOKE and MAGA, is to weaken America.

    For Israel, the best approach is to cut a deal the Palestinians, which will end the threats from the Iranians, eliminate reliance on the Americans, and probably result in Israel losing its invitation to join in World War III (which will be a great show to miss).

    in reply to: Trump throws Kurds and Ukrainians under the bus, will Israel be next? #2264889
    akuperma
    Participant

    1. It is a mistake to see Eretz Yisrael as a unique case. If the United States is opposed to the “axis” that include China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea – the United States will help Israel. If the United States returns to the “America First” foreign policy of the pre-WWII era, it will at most offer Israel moral support but to avoid involvement in foreign wars will not offer military assistance, and to preserve neutrality may block American Jews from assisting Israel.

    2. Based on polling, most Democrats and most Republicans favor the internationalist foreign policy dating back to people such as Truman, Eisenhower, and Kennedy – up to Reagan and the Bushes. However isolationists on the right and left have great influence on both parties, and based on the current situation, it is unknown which way both parties will turn.

    in reply to: Trump throws Kurds and Ukrainians under the bus, will Israel be next? #2264792
    akuperma
    Participant

    If the Republicans go “America First”, it means that the Israelis, the Europeans (not just the Ukrainians), the Taiwanese, the Philippines and the Koreans all end up under the bus. Depending on how overbearing the Russians, Chinese and Iranians are, the US might settle to except their domination as long as we are largely left alone domestically, or perhaps the US will quickly realize it made a big mistake, and go full force into a World War (as happened on the afternoon of Dec. 7, 1941).

    But if you pay close attention to what Trump is saying, he has so far said he will only help allies who help themselves, and since almost all of the NATO members as well as the threatened countries in East Asia are seriously increasing their armed capacities themselves (even Germany is getting ready to go nuclear, we are thrilled???), Trump could simply take credit for global rearmament and become a reincarnation of Harry Truman, John Kennedy or Ronald Reagan. With Trump you never know.

    And Biden may be so scared of losing the “WOKE” Democrats, that he’ll be steadily be turning into an anti-war, and anti-Israel Democrat.

    in reply to: Alabama’s largest hospital says it is halting IVF treatments #2263278
    akuperma
    Participant

    It involves a poorly drafted statute that will be easy to change. The people who drafted it did not think about IVF.

    The state court could have interpreted the statute as intended (similar to how the Supreme Court “saved” Obama care by correcting a drafting error that misplaced a “not” that turned the statute into gibberish), but instead they interpreted the statute according to what it said.

    There is no deep philosophical matter involved (other than that legislators should not pass laws with reading them closely).

    in reply to: Who gains by flooding the US with millions of Illegals?? #2262804
    akuperma
    Participant

    Coffee addict: There is no “flood” of Chinese illegal aliens. Chinese is fairly prosperous (so immigrant wannabees tend to have money and advanced degrees and can at least read English since it is required in schools), and it is very hard to walk or swim to the USA from China (cf: Pacific Ocean). The “flood” coming over the southern land border are largely indigenous “huddled masses” from very poor Latin American countries (while some are educated political refugees, most are working class “deplorables” that tend to be upwardly mobile but with job skills that are either unskilled or at best semi-skilled).

    in reply to: Who gains by flooding the US with millions of Illegals?? #2262742
    akuperma
    Participant

    The immigrants, who have a good chance to become middle class Americans (as did most of our ancestors).

    Their employers, who get hard working and highly motivated workers awed by what to them a very high salaries.
    If you look at major league baseball, not the improvement in the quality of the game due to immigrants, who appear to win over half the positions (in a very objective, skills based competition).

    As most of the immigrants now are social conservatives, from societies that that are conservative in sexual matters, pro-life and anti-LGTBQ, it isn’t so clear if they’ll end up as Republicans or Democrats (though by the time they become citizens, the parties may have realigned). Also, most of the Hispanics coming are fleeing countries with socialists governments, rigged elections and courts that decide cases politically based on rule of law, so they might be disinclined to support the Democrats as they now are (which will really confuse those who hold by “intersectionality”).

    My guess is that the current wave will support rapid economic growth in the USA in spite of a low birthrate, have no impact on politics but might force both parties back to the center, and that in a generation or two the “nativist” movement to keep out mass immigration will be led by Hispanics (just as the current anti-immigration movement is led by the descendants of those who came through Ellis Island).

    in reply to: Biden Working on Creating a Palestinian state #2261845
    akuperma
    Participant

    RE: “Jordan is already 78% of historical Palestine. Jordanians of Palestinian origin constitute more than 80%
    of the population …” — Meaning that if a Palestinian state is established in Jordan, it will be well situated to start to work recapturing its lost territories (Israel). The flaw in the Zionist movement was always that they forgot that the Arabs have been the largest group in Eretz Yisrael for well over a thousand years, and are very unlikely to ever agree to settlement that leave Eretz Yisrael other than under Muslim rule. This was pointed out in the last century by Hareidi gedolim, and ignored by the various types of zionists. One should consider how the Americans would acted if the indigenous Americans attempted to establish an indigenous state in place of the United States (and American control of the United States has been for a much shorter period – 200 years most of what is now the United States was under indigenous control).

    in reply to: What Happened To All My Sillinesses? #2259217
    akuperma
    Participant

    Silliness is “so” pre-Oct. 7. To paraphrase Samuel Johnson, nothing concentrate your mind as an existential crisis.

    In case I used words you can’t understand, the original quote from the 19th century was “When a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully”, and in case you skip the news, the yishuv in Eretz Yisrael may be facing destruction, and the American Jewish community may be facing catastrophic dislocation due to increasing open and politically potent anti-Semitism.

    in reply to: Silence from the intellectual left #2256854
    akuperma
    Participant

    We’ve know the “intellectual left” (the “enlightened ones” as they perceive themselves) for over two centuries, and we have never been so naive as to see them as other than arrogant bigoted elitists who desire to harm Yiddishekit. The secular Jews have identified with them and they are horrified to find that that they admired and respected and imitated (“aped” might be a good word) support genocide of Jews and “canceling” Jewish life, even of those that are secular (killing frum Jews was never problem for them, but now they are going after the hilonim as well).

    Some of the political points in the original posting are irrelevant to us (e.g. while Ukraine’s defeat will encourage Iran and Hamas, immigration policy and the exaggerated response to Covid are not Jewish issues, though if Medinat Yisrael goes the way of Afghanistan we will liberal immigration rules in place)

    in reply to: Why did most Litvish stop wearing Shtreimals? #2256853
    akuperma
    Participant

    Shtreimlech1: I don’t think the Czars had anything to do with it. For starters, a good many Yidden did not live in territory directly rules by Russia. For example, the Hungarian cavalry (part of the Hapsburg army) were still wearing shtreimels at the start of World War I, and furs hats remained popular in Russia (to this very day). Long coats remained popular in Europe until after World War I (all the world leaders were wearing kapotes at the post-war peace conference). Since one still found many non-Hasidic Yidden with shreimels after World War I, it is more likely related to reason many westerners gave up wearing fur hats (cars and trains are heated). While non-Hasidim are somewhat influenced by goyish fashions (e.g. switching to Homburgs and Fedoras as dress hats), most Hasidim couldn’t care bobkes about what the goyim’s fashion influencers do.

    in reply to: Why did most Litvish stop wearing Shtreimals? #2256471
    akuperma
    Participant

    Fur hats used to be standard throughout Europe. One factor was it got warmer (the period from roughly 1400 to the mid-19th century was the “Little Ice Age” and it was unusually cold – that’s why the greens use it to base global warming charts). The centers of non-Hasidic Ashkenazim were increasingly in countries where fur hats ceased to be fashionable. While some attribute the decline of kapotes (frock coats) to King George V’s decision to stop wearing them, automobiles were a major factor (to a greater extent than railroads).

    Hasidim tend not to care about British kings or American presidents, and so are less likely to follow their fashions.

    in reply to: how can turkey as a nato member do business with iran #2256470
    akuperma
    Participant

    Turkey wasn’t allowed to join the EU, and while it was suggested that it become an American or British mandate after World War I, Turkey remained independent and is not bound by what the US and UK want to do. NATO doesn’t really involve Iran as it is a different region.

    in reply to: Upcoming showdown: Democratic Convention #2251530
    akuperma
    Participant

    jackk: 1. The groups previously identified as WOKE (a.k.a. the “Progressive Caucus” of the Democrats), have endorsed Hamas policy, while you can call it “terrorism”, other countries have used genocide as a tool of policy(including mass murder and rpe), and it seems to be a relatively common method of seizing someone’s territory for your own use. 2. The Supreme Court is not a bunch of political hacks, and they are quite likely going to say that whether electors chosen in states without free elections (opposition parties being banned) should have their votes counted is political and is to be decided by the Congress. 3. The Republican party is a coalition of a MAGA (Trump) faction, and the groups that predate Trump’s joining the Republican party (primarily the Reaganite factions and the former “Tea Party” fiscal conservatives). 4. If a considerable number of persons question the legitimacy of an election, it will collapse the currency and credit almost immediately; an election in which the opposition candidate apparently won, but was banned for political reasons, would collapse the government.

    However the platform fight for the Democrats will be a critical issue. Biden is supporting the internationalism that goes back to Kennedy, Truman and Roosevelt (at least post-Pearl Harbor) and that includes support for Ukraine, Taiwan, Israel, South Korea and Philippines – and the Progressive Caucus is clearly anti-Israel and not supportive of a military buildup necessary to oppose the Sino-Russian-Iranian Axis. The platform debate on Hamas will highlight the fault line within the Democrats, and may prove to be a critical turning point, one way or the other, in American (and Jewish) history.

    in reply to: Upcoming showdown: Democratic Convention #2251422
    akuperma
    Participant

    smerel” No, they probably won’t. If there is a serious centerist third party (cf: Joe Lieberman) it will gain support for those who can’t tolerate the WOKE agenda. If the Republicans have a platform (and leadership) that is aiming for capturing the political middle, they will have success. Jews only leaned Democrat about 100 years ago, and this could trigger major switches. Note that even Reform Jews are not endorsing genocide of Jews, and denounced Hamas. There is a pending earthquake if the Democrats officially go WOKE and endorse Hamas’s solution to the “Jewish problem”.

    in reply to: Is it assur to wish a goy a “Happy New Year”? #2250800
    akuperma
    Participant

    1. IF a Jewish boy is born on Dec. 25, his bris would be on Jan. 1, and the goyim hold that someone important to them was a Jewish boy born on Dec. 25. Of course, even according to their scholars, “Dec. 25” is a myth based on a Roman holiday (Saturnalia).

    2. For a long time the “new year” in the Christian calendar began on March 25 (at least in English speaking countries), and the change to Jan. 1 was not motivated by religion but by a desire to standardize calendars.

    in reply to: Is it assur to wish a goy a “Happy New Year”? #2250804
    akuperma
    Participant

    Catlover613: But if the “civil year” is based on an myth that is clearly avodah zarah, would we be allowed to use it. I suggest the best way to regard it is that the Christians decided that dating things from the regnal years of kings, or the founding of the City of Rome (also a myth) as the Romans did, was “awkward” so they picked an arbitrary date. We know it was arbitrary since according to the Christian myths, you know who was born during the reign of Herod (who considered himself “Great” -no one else did), and died in 4 B.C.E. Since it is an arbitrary choice of a base date, there is no reason to hold it is avodah zarah, and in fact Yidden have used it since the Christians switched in the middle ages.

    in reply to: Academia #2249400
    akuperma
    Participant

    The correlation between being an “elite” university and one that tolerates and encourages anti-Semitism has been widely noted. Frum Jews aren’t all that affected since while some of us attend or work for such schools, we are obviously aware of anti-Semitism since we are obviously Jewish – though some “modern” Orthodox do change their personal names and modify their appearance so they won’t look “too” Jewish. For us it has always been a fact of life.

    For the more assimilated, Oct. 7 and the aftermath are an existential shock. They never could imagine that those they saw as colleagues felt that the mass murder and rape, etc., of Jews was good public policy. The good American Jews assumed that anti-Jewish prejudice was only directed against frum Jews (and such assimilationists held such views themselves). A similar event occurred just under a century ago when highly assimilated German Jews discovered what their beloved German countrymen really thought of them (and the meme of a German Jew being led to the gas chamber shouting about his medals earned fighting for the Kaiser)

    One option is migration to the “red” states, and going to politically conservative (or at least moderate) universities. We can also join the many conservative voices attacking the manner in which credentials from “elite” universities are afforded a value not reflected in the quality of education the students receive.

    But the bottom line, is that if the anti-Semitic elites continue in power in America, it is unlikely that the country will remain a good place for Jews, and also that Israel needs to be prepared to stop depending on the United States for assistance.

    in reply to: Clear plastic table cover. #2247311
    akuperma
    Participant

    It’s not even a minhag. How could it be, as plastic is a recent invention. It is convenient since you can have a nice table cloth for milkig and fleishig, and just change the plastic.

    in reply to: Tear Down the Wall between Egypt and Gaza #2247297
    akuperma
    Participant

    1. Most American are descended from immigrants, including almost all frum Jews.
    2. The above fact shows that the pro-immigration parties were successful, and the nativists lost, and it turns out the prosperity of the country is largely due to immigrants.
    3. Jews opposed to non-admission of non-WASP immigrants look silly, since they are arguing that our ancestors should not have been allowed in

    in reply to: Tear Down the Wall between Egypt and Gaza #2247086
    akuperma
    Participant

    Ever since the 17th century, America has a pro-immigration tradition that few other countries share. Palestinians in Egypt would look and sound like foreigners, and the Egyptians would not like that – remember that Egypt made a point of not annexing Gaza when they had a choice.

    America has long accepted “huddled masses, yearning to be free” (which is the case of those trying to come in now), and indeed, in the last presidential election neither party nominated a candidate who ancestors were living in the United States at the time of the Revolution (something that never happened before); in fact in America, most of the “nativists” are themselves descendants of recent immigrants.

    in reply to: Tear Down the Wall between Egypt and Gaza #2246773
    akuperma
    Participant

    Facilitating access to Gaza from Egypt would facilitate terrorist movement and facilitate the importation of weapons. Also remember that many if not most Egyptians tend to support their fellow Muslims in Gaza. — And trying to expel the Gazans to Egypt is very problematic since while Palestinians are basically the same ethnically as the Arabs in Lebanon, Syria and Jordan (excluding the Bedouin elite who rule Jordan), the Egyptians are very different in terms of ethnicity, race and culture.

    in reply to: About Yahya Sinwar #2246017
    akuperma
    Participant

    “Sin” is the word for China. Interestingly, Hamas is backed by the Sino-Russia-Iranian alliance.

    in reply to: King Cuomo returns #2245873
    akuperma
    Participant

    In a world of fools, a corrupt non-fool might be the best choice.

    in reply to: Annoying pop-ups #2245213
    akuperma
    Participant

    Would the individuals complaining about the advertisements care to set up a trust fund to cover the costs (including staff) of operating YWN?

    in reply to: Hamas Torture of Jewish Women #2244479
    akuperma
    Participant

    And the “Progressive” faction of the Democrats gave Hamas their blessing to do so.

    in reply to: Braverman FIRED for Criticizing Palestinian HATE #2242910
    akuperma
    Participant

    Did anyone give a different reason?

    The British government has a long history of being anti-zionist. In the 1920s they sabotaged the agreement between the Jews (both zionist and non-zionist) with the Arabs, and did their best to ignite a Jewish-Arab conflict under their “divide and conquer” strategy. In 1947 and 1948 their whole policy was to help the Arabs win in the hopes that the zionists would be forced to ask the Brits to rescue them, and thereby keep Palestine British (though it was half hearted since by May 1948 they had already been forced out of India when their “let’s get the natives killing each other” strategy failed to result in the natives begging the Brits to stay on as colonial overlords).

    And it isn’t surprising that Braverman, whose roots are in South Asia (even if married to a Jew) might not share those traditional British ideas.

    in reply to: Evolution of liberal reporting on israel in gaza #2241932
    akuperma
    Participant

    Except for the Wall Street Journal (among major news sources) there are very few if any “major” American new sources that still make an attempt at “reporting” the news objectively. This is a return to the status quo ante in the mid-19th century when all newspapers had open political bias, and “reported” the news based upon their own biases. Just as you would expect YWN to be presenting news from a frum perspective (and being very unfair in reporting news of anti-Semites), don’t expect the New York Times (etc.) to do anything other than presenting the news for a WOKE, left wing politically correct perspective (and being unfair to those defined as enemies by the left, which includes frum Yidden and Zionists).

    in reply to: Political Conversations of Old #2241940
    akuperma
    Participant

    CTALAWYER: “Camelot” was hardly extinguished on Nov. 22. Indeed, the clearest consequence was the Lyndon Johnson was able to get the Civil Rights Act of 1964 passed, and for the first time made discrimination against Sabbath-observant Jews illegal, opening up tremendous opportunities for frum Jews to enter professions that had been closed. A large faction of the Democratic party was opposed to civil rights laws, and Kennedy’s death proved to be the catalyst for the coalition of Republicans and Northern Democrats to get the law passed.

    in reply to: The cry that nobody hears #2241890
    akuperma
    Participant

    The left wing has been anti-Semitic for years. Usually the focus was on traditional Jews, but Hamas has made it clear that the international left sees all Jews as the enemy – something that we frum Yidden have always known, but is a shock to those Jews who used to think of themselves as good members of the politically correct “progressive” movement. The similarity is to German Jews who had seen themselves as good and respected Germans, until they woke up and realized that the Germans didn’t agree.

    in reply to: Political Conversations of Old #2241888
    akuperma
    Participant

    John Kennedy actually wore a proper frock coat (kapote, as we call it), and a top hat to his inauguration. The hat got misplaced and when he walked down Pennsylvania Avenue he was bare headed. What actually killed hats as part of male dress was the automobile (which also killed kapotes as a standard business dress – though George V decision to stop wearing them was a recognition of the change).

    Ideologically, Kennedy’s tax policies (similar to Reagan and Trump, meaning he is a DINO by today’s standards) serious stimulated the economy. His militant opposition to the the Soviet-China alliance was similar to Reagan, and a lot more than most of today’s Democrats. His support for Civil rights is why frum Jews today have career options beyond working for other Jews or opening their own business – while the five day workweek was due to FDR, a prohibition of religious discrimination in employment came from the Civil Rights Act (proposed by Kennedy, the Republicans and the liberal wing of the Democrats – most of the opposition came form the conservative wing of the Democrats).

    in reply to: NYPL Eliminates Sunday Hours #2241886
    akuperma
    Participant

    Kuvult:

    1. Public libraries in general have long preferred opening on Saturday and closing on Sunday, even in neighborhoods with large Shomer Shabbos populations. Compare the Saturday hours to the Sunday hours. And as a consequence, they are unable to accommodate staff members who are unwilling to work on Saturday.

    2. These biases go way back. Over a century ago, New York State’s librarian was fired at the insistence of the legislature since he was openly anti-Semitic – and the library profession was outraged by the legislature’s bias. Job discrimination even against non-frum Jews continued through the mid-20th century, and even today it is hard for someone who is openly Orthodox (Shomer Shabbos, and whose clothing and preferred days off based on the Jewish calendar) to get a job as a librarian unless working for a Jewish library or as a specialist in Jewish/Hebrew studies.

    3. The people running NYPL are left wing Democrats, as is most of the city government. The new “politically correct” position is that all Jews (not just religious ones, though we are the most visible) are public enemies who should be discriminated against. What we would want is for advocates of “Diversity, Equity and Inclusion” to be seen as what they are, Nazis if 21st dress and treated accordingly (fired and marginalized) but the reality is that they control most of the political institutes in blue cities and states.

    in reply to: NYPL Eliminates Sunday Hours #2241716
    akuperma
    Participant

    I suspect it has more to do with anti-Semitism. The library profession from which I recently retired has always been very tolerant of anti-Semitism, and the current waive of anti-Semitism which is now considered normative in the WOKE community (and most librarians are very WOKE) is the most likely explanation.

    While the NYPL public libraries are government agencies, complaining to the politicians probably won’t help as most of them are progressive Democrats who probably see closing the libraries on Sunday as a cost efficient way to show their dislike of Jews.

    akuperma
    Participant

    1. If you notice a common sort of behavior of the Yismaelim, going back almost 4000 years, you understand that human life is less important to them than it is to us. No hidush.
    2. Israel is not willing to execute Palestinian prisoners, especially if they were arrested only for opposing the regime (as opposed to terrorism). The Palestinians have no qualms about executing Jewish prisoners, as they clearly illustrated (and note, most of the Arab world, and the political left, cheered the murder, torture and rape of Jews). By halacha, killing non-combatants is only allowed if Ha-Shem, or at least a Navi, or at least a Kohen Gadol with Urim ve-Tumim says its okay. And whatever you think of Bibi, he is a prophet or even a Melekh Beis Davis.

    in reply to: I guess ChaBaD is Zionist now? #2238982
    akuperma
    Participant

    With many goyim, including important political leaders, are marching through the streets of the world calling for the murder of Jews, and clearly not distinguishing between frum or frei, Hareidi or Reform, Israeli or living in golus – then it is not the time to be philosophizing after Zionism or the nature and halachic status of Medinat Yisrael.

    in reply to: Rally in Washington #2238639
    akuperma
    Participant

    The MARC (Maryland commuter rail) has announced that due to a “First amendment event” the trains may be very crowded on Tuesday. I would not be surprised if many non-frum Jews and goyim come. The issue of the WOKE left endorsing murder, kidnapping and rape is actually quite important to more than just the frum community, as they (the pro-Hamas demonstrators) appear to have alienated more than just Orthodox Jews, even if it is probably considered “existential” only to us.

    in reply to: Rally in Washington #2238637
    akuperma
    Participant

    The MARC (Maryland commuter rail) has announced that due to a “First amendment event” the trains may be very crowded on Tuesday. I would not be surprised if non-frum Jews and goyim come. The issue of the WOKE left endorsing murder, kidnapping and rape is actually quite important to more than just the frum community, as they (the pro-Hamas demonstrators) appear to have alienated more than just Orthodox Jews.

    in reply to: Easy questions to Palestinian “supporters” #2238612
    akuperma
    Participant

    If the “left” favored Taiwan and Ukraine, they would be demanding expanding the military to Cold War levels (at least), and reducing domestic spending while raising taxes to pay for it. The same holds true of the “right”. This suggests that the current political leadership is not very serious about supporting Israel, Ukraine or Taiwan, and that the Hamas outrage is calling the American “bluff”.

    Coffee addct: Those who supported the Nazis for an ulterior motive but did not support the Holocaust are NOT seen in the same light as the Nazis. This includes Finland (allied with Germany against the Soviet Union, but only as a co-belligerent and never at war with the other Allies, and refused to persecute Jews or even to exclude them from its army) and Japan (allied with Germany but refused German requests to round up and execute Jews within its territories).

    in reply to: Rally in Washington #2238559
    akuperma
    Participant

    Given that the political left is holding rallies calling for genocide of Jews, it might be useful to make it clear we object. The “WOKE” demand is for a Judenrein world, and it is in our interests to force left-wing Democrats to confront this and decide if they really want to include a faction that supports mass murder as a matter of policy.

    To the one saying “how many unemployed…”. If one holds that the laws against homicide, and the public international laws against genocide and murder of civilians in war time, no longer apply to Yidden– Kal ve Homer the law as against employment discrimination don’t apply.

    in reply to: Easy questions to Palestinian “supporters” #2238416
    akuperma
    Participant

    Actually most of the “Progressive caucus” opposes American intervention abroad and are just as isolationist as Trump’s “America First.” They oppose building up the military, and regard defense contractors as evil war-mongering capitalists (and in their lingo, “capitalist” is a pejorative).

    The ones who support Taiwan and Ukraine, are the RINOs (Reagan Republicans) and DINOs (cold war Democrats in the Truman/John Kennedy model), and there are the ones who support Israel. Though not very enthusiastically (note that none of them favor cutting the domestic spending or raising taxes, meaning they are willing to come up with the money to match China/Russia/Iranian military spending).

    in reply to: Does Hashem approve of voting for a democrat #2238084
    akuperma
    Participant

    1. Quotes from dead rabbanim are irrelevant since political parties change over time. In the last century the core principle of the Democrats was white supremacy. Both parties have gone through phases of being isolationists or interventionists. Quoting a rav about which party to favor would be like quoting a rav on whether to wear a raincoat (without including information such as the weather when he made the quote).

    2. In 2023, the Democrats include an openly anti-Semitic wing and they may be able to exercise of veto over the party. The Republicans contain an isolationist wing which while not anti-Semitic, and sympathetic to Zionism, would render the United States incapable of giving Israel meaningful assistance if (as appears to be happening) the fighting shifts from disorganized terrorists, to regular armed forces supported by Russia, China and Iran.

    3. We should be asking for the Democrats to treat their WOKE wing the way the Republicans have dealt in the recent past when white supremacists managed to get he Republican nomination (e.g. David Duke, they said to abstain or vote Democrat). One would like to see Democrats refusing to support WOKE candidates who endorse mass murder of Jews.

    4. But the Republicans’ price for aiding Israel is to throw Ukraine under the bus, leading to a major victory for the Sino-Russian alliance. Another Republican is deliberately trying to block all promotions for a reason unrelated to national security. What Israel needs now is a strong United States military, which the Republicans are just as unenthused about as the Democrats.

    in reply to: Zelensky is jewish and so is kamala harris’ stepdaughter #2237846
    akuperma
    Participant

    You need to trace the maternal ancestry back at least 200 (or at least until someone who you can establish was frum). For Ashkenazim, the movements towards intermarriage and people going OTD in large numbers began about 250 years ago. Since the Euro-American custom is for a child to have the father’s surname, the name itself gives you no useful information about whether the great-great-great-grandmother was a Yid.

Viewing 50 posts - 151 through 200 (of 3,447 total)