Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
JosephParticipant
As well, I am not convinced that the study of said kefira with the attitude that it must be carefully considered and weighed against Torah values is necessarily wrong.
102030 –
It is absolutely forbidden to learn or read kefira (without a special heter of “kidei l’horos”). And there is much kefira (as well as plain attacks on Rabbonim — specifically and in general) on the net.
The bottom line about using the net, is to ask a shaila if it is permissible or not — and if so in what circumstances.
JosephParticipantJothar also noted that the financial incentive to cheat with non-milk dairy products may be greater.
JosephParticipantames,
Yiddish is used by the Gedolim and has a holyness to it (certainly less than Loshon HaKodesh) since it was used by Yidden for 1,000+ years to learn Torah. It also allows Yidden from across the Globe to communicate with one another, despite other linguistical and cultural differences. And this is why in (many) Yeshiva’s the Rosh Yeshiva’s shiur, if not all shiurim, are given in Yiddish and it is used as the primary language by the Gedolim and Rabbonim.
(BTW “ivrit” is a treif language invented by a secular Torah despising zionist.)
January 30, 2009 9:54 pm at 9:54 pm in reply to: The Laboratory II – Try Your HTML & ASCII Art Experiments Here #1053232JosephParticipant… and an anav too!
JosephParticipantAhhh Reb Moish, you’re too much of a big anav.
JosephParticipantMoish, we all loved your Dvar Torah last week!
Everyone was raving about it.
JosephParticipantFor all those that wish to shep nachas from Moish the Tzaddik Nister:
Our very own in-house Talmid Chochom!!
January 30, 2009 9:22 pm at 9:22 pm in reply to: The Laboratory II – Try Your HTML & ASCII Art Experiments Here #1053223JosephParticipantteen:
ICOT is a talmid chochom and a baki in all matters. (As we know, all knowledge comes from the Torah.)
JosephParticipantmw13 – yasher koach
102030 – Kefira on the net has caused countless damage (separate from the pritzus and marital issues that you alluded to.)
January 30, 2009 9:10 pm at 9:10 pm in reply to: The Laboratory II – Try Your HTML & ASCII Art Experiments Here #1053221JosephParticipantTo use the “A” code to link:
JosephParticipantBTW Moish proved he is a Tzaddik Nister in the 3 Boys in Japan thread.
JosephParticipantAh gutten Erev Shabbos!
January 30, 2009 7:28 pm at 7:28 pm in reply to: The Laboratory II – Try Your HTML & ASCII Art Experiments Here #1053209JosephParticipantqwerty – its unnecessary (but won’t ruin the art.)
JosephParticipantThis brings to mind the judicial murder of Terri Schiavo.
JosephParticipant102030 – Kefira IS one of the challanges of the internet.
January 30, 2009 7:08 pm at 7:08 pm in reply to: The Laboratory II – Try Your HTML & ASCII Art Experiments Here #1053205JosephParticipantAll,
You do not need a period (.) AFTER the ASCII art (i.e. after the last backtick.)
JosephParticipantThank you YW-Mod 99.
JosephParticipanta wooden heart?
January 30, 2009 4:50 am at 4:50 am in reply to: The Laboratory II – Try Your HTML & ASCII Art Experiments Here #1053144JosephParticipantICOT:
I followed your instructions, and I now see smoke emanating from my laptop.
What do I do?
JosephParticipantsqueak, but you already declined my lunch invite. If I make it a cholent meal, can I expect you?
JosephParticipantazi,
Obviously the Torah bothers you, as the moderator made clear. In that case, when I express the Torah opinion, be it a married women needing to cover her hair or be it something else, it is obvious why it bothers you: You don’t like what the Torah says, as explained by our Rabbonim.
JosephParticipantsqueak, do you still fondly remember the days in our Yeshiva?
What makes it so much fun to argue with me, considering you agree with me most of the time (if not the delivery, surely the point)?
Btw, I expect to see you in the mikva this Erev Shabbos. The Gabba promised it will be extra hot.
JosephParticipantazi,
The moderator didn’t embarrass you.
You embarrass yourself.
JosephParticipantsqueak – lunch was cancelled by the mods.
qwerty – I also recall that it was an obvious joke, that you said you understood 🙂
JosephParticipantIf anyone here thinks they know things that the Gedolim didn’t consider, please contact your local Godol and so inform him.
Until then, and until they say otherwise, follow their current directives.
JosephParticipantCan someone please explain to me, in detail, the theory of relativity?
Specifically, both special relativity and general relativity.
January 30, 2009 2:01 am at 2:01 am in reply to: The Laboratory II – Try Your HTML & ASCII Art Experiments Here #1053096JosephParticipantCurious – do you have a pension? are you moving into a retirement home?
JosephParticipantSJS, read the earlier messages in this thread.
JosephParticipantmoish01, I was already impressed with you, but now declare you to be a tzaddik nister. You obviously know more Torah then you have let on! 🙂
Of course you are referring to the story in the 13th century where the Maharam (of Rothenburg) was captured by the Duke of Lombardy. The Jewish community collected a great deal of money to ransom him. The Maharam sent word from prison ordering that the money be returned to the donors and remained in confinement for the seven remaining years of his life.
To answer your question, yes I believe the Maharam was concerned that they may take other Jewish prisoners. (Although the Maharshal says that the Maharam was stricter on himself than he had to be. So perhaps the Maharshal is saying that the reason was the heavy financial burden on Klal Yisroel — although Tosafos says that a Godol could be redeemed at any financial cost.)
JosephParticipantoomis,
you said that hugging (or touching) is an issue of being “makpid.” And I told you it is not. Shomer Negiah is halacha, not something that some people can be makpid about and some not, or something that is just “l’chatchilah”. It is the law.
JosephParticipantflatbush27
you are correct.
JosephParticipantdd – perhaps you remember incorrectly; please provide a mekor.
JosephParticipantqwerty, what are you talking about (re: 2 weeks ago not meaning something)?
JosephParticipantjoseph,
that’s two 🙂
moish01, there is only one exception. but it is a machlokes in the Gemora which one of two things that the one exception is.
January 29, 2009 3:10 am at 3:10 am in reply to: Speaking Out Against Smoking in Yerushalyim #635225JosephParticipantmazal: “Yenem tzu bagroben is gring.” –> To bury another [person] is easy.
JosephParticipantoomis: “If there are pictures of people hugging or whatever, then a person who is makpid should not be looking at those pictures.”
No, oomis, that is halacha not a chumra.
JosephParticipantames, my apologies.
JosephParticipantSJS – its squeak’s reworded, for “Kishkas”.
JosephParticipantMaybe the flock are underestimating their Rabbonim.
JosephParticipantareivim, its not newfound, its longstanding. and you too can join squeak and myself… the mikva is good and hot.
btw squeak, how are you certain no one else will find it out?
JosephParticipantnotpashut, you said that in Brooklyn (as compared to Eretz Yisroel) it is standard practice for people to say Good Shabbos to each other?
I wish that were so…
JosephParticipantThe Gemora (Bava Basra 8b) calls pidyon shvuyim a “mitzvah rabbah” and says that captivity is worse than starvation and death. Rambam rules that he who ignores ransoming a captive is guilty of transgressing commandments such as “you shall not harden your heart” (Devorim 15:7); “you shall not stand idly by the blood of your brother” (Vayikra 19:16); and “you shall love your neighbor as yourself” (Leviticus 19:18).
And one who delays in ransoming a captive is considered like a murderer (Yoreh Deah 252:3). Indeed, Rambam himself wrote letters exhorting his fellow Jews to redeem captives and collected money for pidyon shvuyim.
Pidyon shvuyim is an absolute mitzvah, which must be followed at all times. There is ONLY one major exception, as explained in the Gemora (Gittin 45a). And that exception is either (its a machlokes) a-its too big a financial burden on klal yisroel or b-they goyim might take more Jewish prisoners. That is the ONLY exception.
Pidyun Shvuyim is a MITZVAH RABBAH, innocent or guilty.
January 29, 2009 12:33 am at 12:33 am in reply to: Shidduch �Crisis�, Daas Torah and Hishtadlos #634734JosephParticipantgavra: “non-faker Gedolim” is an oxymoron.
JosephParticipantLoving Kindness
Step by Step:
When someone comes to me for a favor or charity, I will make sure to greet the person with a smile and a pleasant demeanor.
JosephParticipantoomis:
Prior to Yaakov Avinu, there was no sickness before one died. Rather, the soul just left the body as it had been breathed in, through the nostrils, with a sneeze, so to speak. Yaakov acknowledged the “gift” of being sick before death, so that one can put his affairs in order. A sneeze is no longer a sign of death, but just a reminder of illness (sometimes a symptom and sometimes just a reminder). This is why people say ASUTA or LIVRIYUT, or something like that, to a person who sneezes. But the sneezer himself quotes the words of Yaakov Avinu. And even though people are more familiar with ASUTA (or whatever someone else says when someone sneezes), it is closer to a requirement for the sneezer himself to say LISHU’ATCHA KIVITI HASHEM. [from Rabbi Yehuda Leib Ginsberg, shlita]
JosephParticipantRav Avigdor Miller
Rav Moshe Meir Weiss
JosephParticipantcherrybim, everything you said in your last comment is true. But you were mistaken in your first comment. I used to walk home with him almost every day, and he wouldn’t initiate greetings with females on the street.
JosephParticipantSJS – No, I mean legally.
January 27, 2009 6:08 am at 6:08 am in reply to: Shidduch �Crisis�, Daas Torah and Hishtadlos #634718JosephParticipantgavra,
I’m not sure what a fraudster has to do with your comment of “Who knows better, the expert who knows the case and has studied the field or the Rav who does not?” If you are moida that a fraud who calls himself a Rabbi is nothing but a faker, then one shouldn’t have such a rasha for a “rabbi” on anything. What does that have to do with expert advice, deferring, and/or the Brooklyn Bridge?
tal’s comment of I think you may be convincing yourself that Rabbanim respond in matters they feel they are unqualified… Rabbanim don’t speak when they are not certain… and the rest of tal’s comment is 100% on the mark.
January 27, 2009 5:25 am at 5:25 am in reply to: Daven With A Hat BeYichidus or Without it with a Minyan #1081925JosephParticipantmoish – we care because we are all yidden.
-
AuthorPosts