Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Menachem ShmeiParticipant
Cholent,
Never heard that one!
Gave me a good laugh ๐August 27, 2023 8:12 pm at 8:12 pm in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2220273Menachem ShmeiParticipantโThis is one thing we both agree on.โ
โโโโโโโโโโโ
Not at all sure we can agree on this one .We can’t agree that we need Moshiach since I hold that many tzaddikim have had nevuah after ืืื ืืืจืื ืืืืื!?
Wow, you seem really set on making problems.
Menachem ShmeiParticipantTo the OP,
Mitzvah #2 is definitely correct.
Mitzvah #3 – Sometimes. If there is a clear miracle, and they openly recognize the hand of Hashem in protecting Jewish people.
August 27, 2023 8:07 pm at 8:07 pm in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2220256Menachem ShmeiParticipantyankel,
Okay, you’re right. I am a Lubavitcher so I am biased, so I have no right to defend Lubavitch. Only those who disagree with Lubavitch have the right to defend it. You are completely objective, as you only care about truth, so all your attacks on Lubavitch must be true, and my defenses are worthless.
Your interpretations of what the Rebbe meant trump mine, despite the fact that you barely learned any of his teachings, while I learned thousands of pages of his teachings, and heard hundreds of hours of his talks. As a matter of fact, the more I study, the more biased I become, and the less of an ability I have to understand his teachings.
This conversation now reaches a dead end, and anything I say further is pointless, unless it is attacking Lubavitch, since that is the only thing I can do objectively.
You can now join Qwerty in saying: Checkmate.
[I would just like to repeat an analogy that I used before: Someone reads antisemitic literature with some “shockingly hateful” statements from the Talmud. He approaches the Talmudic scholar and says, “I can’t believe you study this terrible book.” The scholar responds, “You have only read a few lines out of context. If you dedicate your life to studying this, and understanding it properly, you will come to appreciate its inner beauty and true meaning.” The attacker responds, “You love the Talmud so you are biased. My ignorant attacks are objective, so they have more value than your biased, learned defense.”]
August 27, 2023 3:18 pm at 3:18 pm in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2220157Menachem ShmeiParticipantIt stands for โkeep it simple stupid.โ Too many of the posters get bogged down arguimg Pshatim in Tanya and the like. This is irrelevant. Lubavichers posit that the Rebbe is god. Nothing .ore need be said
Sorry, but in my books, Judaism isn’t simple and stupid. The tzedukkim said to use the KISS method. Why make problems? Just take Torah literally!
But that is not Judaism. Judaism is complicated, with lots of nuance.
Qwerty,
You still haven’t answered me why you accept all the Torah giants that I quoted earlier, when if using the KISS method, they would be saying that tzaddikim are G-d?
I think I asked you this 5 or 6 timesAugust 27, 2023 11:32 am at 11:32 am in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2220096Menachem ShmeiParticipantIs there anything still happening with the point I raised about โbias โ ?
I don’t understand what wasn’t clear in my first post.
I’ll repeat: I know lots of Lubavitchers were parts of other groups (see above for details) and decided that the truth is in Lubavitch.
If I can’t write anything due to my bias, I can get one of those many friends to write for me. Should I do that?
I think that we need Mashiach now โฆ. the REAL one .
This is one thing we both agree on.
August 27, 2023 7:56 am at 7:56 am in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2219994Menachem ShmeiParticipantJust a small question โ when their rebbe told his hasidim to โphaiphโ , who do you think they were phaiphing on ?
They were phaiphing on us , on our criticism of habad . On our questions .Interesting, this seems to answer my question my OP:
You are so obsessed with Chabad because you are an unfortunate victim of the Rebbe asking people to whistle at farbrengens.
August 27, 2023 7:45 am at 7:45 am in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2219992Menachem ShmeiParticipantthe Lubavich claim that when other non-Lubavich chassidim say the words โthe rebbeโ they are openly referring only to the Lubavicher rebbe, not to their own rebbe
I never heard this, but I guess it’s possible that a (more) ignorant Lubavitcher guy thought this once. Okay, whatever.
August 26, 2023 9:17 pm at 9:17 pm in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2219870Menachem ShmeiParticipant2cents,
Very important and worthy question about method of knowing.
could you specify the source indicating that tzadikim no longer possess a yetzer harah?
Tanya. Perek Yud, etc.
The Alter Rebbe bases this on several psukim and Maamarei Razal.
ืืื ืืื ืืงืจืื
ืืืขืจืช ืืจืข ืืงืจืื
ืฆืืืงืื ืืฆืจ ืืื ืฉืืคืื
Etc.In tzaddik itself, there are many levels. Tzaddik gramur, tzaddik eino gamur. In the latter are countless levels.
August 25, 2023 11:36 am at 11:36 am in reply to: Chris Christie – why can’t Jews rally around him? #2219706Menachem ShmeiParticipantIt’s surprising that it’s actually accepted to bash a political candidate due to his weight. Whatever.
It’s nice that Christie is spending all his time attacking Trump for not caring about the country and making this a personal fight, but in doing so, Christie sort of gives off the same impression of himself.
As it says in Tanya: ืืืชืืืง ืขื ืื ืืืื ืืชื ืืื ืื ืื
August 25, 2023 9:40 am at 9:40 am in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2219643Menachem ShmeiParticipant“I was not a misnaged. Far from it . I Was an Omed Min HaTsad. Did not understand what all those people wanted from habad . And had sympathy for the [apparent] victim of unwarranted accusations.
Nevertheless came to that conclusion.
So it seems that you agree that you are not qualified ?”I am pro-Chabad in all (or most) of my posts, so you assume that I’m a chossid and therefore biased.
Subsequently, I should do the same with you:
You are anti-Chabad in all (or most) of your posts, so I should assume that you’re a misnaged and therefore biased.So you answer that you weren’t born a misnaged, you BECAME one. And what if I became Lubavitch? Do you have any reason to assume that I was born Lubavitch?
And if I was born Lubavitch, maybe my grandfather was born into a holy rebbishe mishpacha, yet left to become Lubavitch because he found the truth there?
Maybe I have friends who were top talmidim in Lakewood, choshuve families in Satmar, who left and became Lubavitch, and are now shluchim around the world?What makes you think that you’re the only one with the right to unbiasedness?
Listening to his talks is irrelevant to this question
How is it irrelevant? You are trying to figure out a rabbis true kavana in how he spoke. Obviously, someone who learned his teachings know more about what he thinks than someone who didn’t.
This is like someone who says (ch”v ch”v) that the Talmud is a horrible book that is full of hateful teachings and illogical ideas. You ask him, “How much Talmud have you studied?” He says, “studying Talmud is irrelevant to this question.”
(However, the guy who did study Talmud has one downside: Since he spent so much time studying it, he becomes biased in defending it. Whereas the guy who never opened it up is completely objective, so his hateful remarks have more value.)
August 25, 2023 9:32 am at 9:32 am in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2219639Menachem ShmeiParticipant“being a talmid/chasid of anyone can make you unable to see their mistakes or chisronos”
There are two reasons for this:
1. Because they are biased, and too blind to see the truth.
2. Because they have a true knowledge and understanding of their Rebbe’s teaching’s, so they might know that what others are saying are untrue or misinterpretations.Obviously, I think of myself as a number 2 (as I think every human being does), because I love myself, and consider myself an intellectual person. Even if I’m biased, I’m to blinded to see it.
August 25, 2023 9:30 am at 9:30 am in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2219638Menachem ShmeiParticipantwhy do you think Chabad has so many misnagdim, way more than other Chassidic groups?
Let me reword that:
Why did misnagdim stop being menaged to most Chassidic groups, but stayed menaged to Chabad?…
Menachem ShmeiParticipantJust drink Tropicana!
It’s a mitzvah to buy from Jews.
August 24, 2023 10:46 pm at 10:46 pm in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2219553Menachem ShmeiParticipantThink that your being a hasid of his , precludes you of objectivity in this regard
I can say the same about you being a misnaged.
I used to be naive , but made a uturn on this .
Why?
Because you studied and listened to so many of his talks that you realized what he really meant?
Or because you heard so many one-line excerpts of his statements?
Or because you heard so much anti-Chabad rhetoric?
Menachem ShmeiParticipantI remember a camp legend when I was a kid (I.e. probably made up, but we all believed it) that they did a levaya breakout once, and when they opened the aron, they found the counselor dead.
August 24, 2023 9:41 pm at 9:41 pm in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2219501Menachem ShmeiParticipantmainstream Jewry categorically rejects this
Who is mainstream Jewry?
The democrats?
The litvishers?
The mizrachim?
The MO?
The chassidishers?If it’s the latter, which one? Belz? Satmar? Sanz? Bobev? Gur?
If you answer all of the above, how many things do they all agree on?
Does Belz have to give up their derech because no one else in the list agrees with them (or else they would be Belz)? What about MO? What about Brisk? What about Rabbi Miller?Each one of these groups is different from “mainstream Jewry” whatever that means.
edited
August 24, 2023 3:40 pm at 3:40 pm in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2219339Menachem ShmeiParticipantCan anyone here point out a godol beYisroel over the last generations who pushed his greatness to the forefront as much as the Lubavicher rebbe did?
This is twisting the facts and extremely disrespectful. Anyone who knows anything about the Rebbe knows his incredible anivus.
All those things you quoted were actually said about his father-in-law. His anivus was so great, that he never publicly called himself the Rebbe. He constantly said that the Rebbe and nossi was his father-in-law.
Even by the official “kabbolas hanesius” on Yud Shevat (after a full year of begging by the chassidim, and his constant refusal) he never officially said “I am Rebbe”. He just hinted to accepting it with a maamar.
Yet, he stil continued to consider his father-in-law the Rebbe.
The chassidim were the ones who pushed his greatness to the forefront. They gave him the same honor that he gave to his father-in-law.
August 23, 2023 10:24 pm at 10:24 pm in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2219003Menachem ShmeiParticipantIn no way are we enjoined to delve into the esoteric… but Chabad ignored all this and decided to go against the norm. It is now reaping what it sowed in violating the edict of our Rabbonim.
You make it sound like all the rabbanim of klal Yisroel ruled that one is not allowed to learn kabbala, yet in recent years a bunch of Chabad fanatics ignored the rabbanim and started poking their noses in the wrong places.
This is far from the truth.
The Arizal already said: ืืืืจืืช ืืื ืืืืจืื ืื ืืืชืจ ืืืฆืื ืืืืืช ืืืช ืืืืื
(In these recent generations it is a mitzvah to reveal this chochma).Came the Baal Shem Tov and his many followers in the next generations who were Torah giants in nigleh and chassidus, and they felt that the time came to spread this Torah to Klal Yisroel more than ever before (because of the special inspiration that was need for our hard times, as well as to prepare for the geula).
If Rav Reuven Feinstein (or any other rov) feels that this is unnecessary, does that compel Chabad chassidim to give up the derech of their own rebbes!?
(Then you claim that CHABAD wants everyone to follow their rabbis!)
August 23, 2023 10:10 am at 10:10 am in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2218806Menachem ShmeiParticipantI donโt know how to read such postings. I learn woth Artscroll.
Free translation from Chabad dot org:
B”H
Many people seek to pinpoint and characterize the virยญtues and preeminence of each of the Rebbeim of Chabad, and in particular of the Nasi of our generation โ my revered father-in-law, the Rebbe, ืื”ื โ in various terms:2 the paradigm of self-sacrifice, a gaon, a man of exemplary character traits, a tzaddik, an individual endowed with divine inspiraยญtion, an individual accustomed to [performing] miracles, and so on.
When one considers how the teachings of Chassidus deยญfine what self-sacrifice really means, what being a gaon really means, and so on, these are indeed extremely laudaยญtory terms.
Nevertheless, the essential point is missing here. Apart from this being the essence per se, it is especially important because of the vital effect it has [in general], and in particular upon us, the community of those who are his chassidim and who are bound to him. That essential point is the fact that he is the Nasi, and the Nasi of Chabad.
For a Nasi by definition is referred to as3 the head of the multitudes of Israel; in relation to them he is the โheadโ and โbrainโ; their nurture and life-force reach them through him; and by cleaving to him they are bound and united with their Source in the Supernal worlds.
There are various categories of Nesiim:4 some Nesiim convey their influence in an internalized manner; others diffuse their influence in an indirect and encompassing manner.5 These differences may be further subdivided: some Nesiim endow their recipients with insights into the revealed plane of the Torah (Nigleh); some endow their recipients with insights into the mystical plane of the Torah, and some do both together; some instruct their followers in the paths of avodah and Chassidus; some direct material benefits to their followers; and so on.
And there are Nesiโim who comprise several of these attributes, or even all of them.6
This [essential] quality [of a Nasi] has characterized the leadership of the Nesiim of Chabad from the very beginning, from the Alter Rebbe up to and including my revered father-in-law, the Rebbe, ืื”ื. They incorporated all the above attributes: they radiated both inward and encompassing influence โ in Torah, in avodah, and in the practice of good deeds; [and they conveyed blessings both] spiritual and material. Consequently, [the Nesiim of Chabad] have been bound7 with all 613 organs of the soul and body of those who were connected with them.
Every single one of us must know โ i.e., must think deeply and fix his thought8 on this โ that [the Rebbe Rayatz] is indeed the Nasi and the head; from him and through him are directed all material and spiritual benefacยญtions; and by being bound to him (in his letters he has taught us how this is accomplished)9 we are bound and united with the spiritual root, with the ultimate Supernal spiritual root.
Menachem Schneerson
3 Tammuz, 5710 [1950]
Brooklyn, N.Y.ยซ Previous
Instructions concerning the establishment of educational programs for Jewish children in North Africa
Next ยป
The Haftorah to be read when Rosh Chodesh Av falls on Shabbos
FOOTNOTES
1.
[The letter appears in Sefer HaMaamarim 5710, p. 254; it is reprinted in Likkutei Sichos, Vol. XI, p. 209.]2.
[See the discussion of these virtues in the conclusion of Letter No. 637.]3.
See Tanya, ch. 2.4.
Discussed at length in: Torah Or, Parshas Miketz, s.v. Mitzvas Ner Chanukah; Sefer HaMitzvos (Derech Mitzvosecha) by the Tzemach Tzedek, s.v. Mitzvas Ner Chanukah, sec. 3; and in the maamar beginning LeMaan Daas, 5669 [in Sefer HaMaamarim 5669, p. 39ff.].5.
[Bivchinas makif, in the original.]6.
As discussed in Torah Or (loc. cit.), end of sec. 7, Mashiach comprises the qualiยญties of both roโim and nesichim. In the Talmud (Sukkah 52b), Mashiach is reckoned among the nesichim, evidently because this is his dominant quality.[Torah Or, loc. cit., explains that the term roโim (shepherds) refers to leaders who draw down influence that is internalized among the Jewish people. Nesichim (princes) refers to leaders whose influence is conveyed bederech makkif (in an encompassing manner). Although Mashiach will convey both these types of influence (i.e., he will be both teacher and king), his primary quality will resemble that of the nesichim.]
7.
[In the original (as a noun), hiskashrus.]8.
[In the original, โknowโ is ladaas, implying attachment born of this kind of thinking; cf. Tanya, end of ch.3.]9.
[See Letter No. 561 which discusses this bonding process.]August 23, 2023 12:24 am at 12:24 am in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2218699Menachem ShmeiParticipantThere’s been a little too much heat here today for me to get a logical word in, so I’m just gonna let everything slip by.
There’s just one thing that I feel the need to comment on:
In one such letter the Rebbe described the characteristics of a Nasi Chabad, and Iโll quote,โEvery Nasi Chabad is a Baal Mofes, and he has Ruach Hakodesh. But the main thing to know is that the Nasi Chabad is the Nasi Hador.โ
Since the Rebbe was grossly misquoted here, I feel the need to bring the true letter that qwerty is probably referring to, dated Gimmel Tammuz 5710:
ื”ื,
ืจืืื ืืืืคืฉืื ืืืืืจืื ืืขืืืช ืืืืืืช ื ืฉืืื ืื”ื ืืืื, ืื ืฉืื ืืืจื ื, ืืื ื”ืง ืื”ื ืืืื”ืจ ืื”ื, ืืคืจื ืืขื ืื ืื ืฉืื ืื: ืืืฉ ืืืกืืจืืช-ื ืคืฉ, ืืืื, ืืขื ืืืืช, ืฆืืืง, ืืขื ืจืื ืืงืืืฉ, ืืืืื ืื ืกืื ืืขืื ืืขืื.
ืืืืื ืืืืชืจ ืฉืืืื ืืื, ืขื ืคื ืืืืืจื ืืชืืจืช ืืืกืืืืช, ืืื ืืกืืจืืช ื ืคืฉ, ืืื ืืืื ืืื’.
ืืืื ืื โ ืืขืืงืจ ืืกืจ ืืื. ืื ืืกืฃ ืขื ืื, ืฉืืื ืขืืงืจ ืืขืฆื, ืืฉืื ืืื ืืืืื ืืฉืื ืฉื ืืืข ืืืืชืจ, ืืืืืื ืื ื, ืงืื ืืกืืืื ืืืงืืฉืจืื. ืืืื โ ืื ืฉืืื ืืื ืื ืฉืื, ืื ืฉืื ืื”ื.
ืื โ ื ืฉืื ืืืื, ื ืงืจื ืจืืฉ1 ืืืคื ืืฉืจืื, ืืื ืืืื ืช ืจืืฉ ืืืื ืืืืืื, ืืืื ื ืืื ืื ืืงื ืืืืืช ืฉืืื. ืืขื ืืื ืืืืืงื ืื ืงืฉืืจืื ืืืืืืืื ืื ืืฉืจืฉื ืืืขืื ืืขืื.
ืืื ื ืืื ืกืืืื ืื ืฉืืืื2: ืืื ืืฉืจ ืืฉืคืขืชื ืืืืื ืช ืคื ืืืืืช, ืืืื ืืฉืจ ืืฉืคืขืชื ืืืืื ืช ืืงืืฃ. ืืืื ืืืคื ืืืืืงืื: ืื ืืฉืคืืขื ืืชืืจืช ืื ืืื ืื ืื ืกืชืจ ืื ืืฉื ืืื ืืืืื, ืืืืื ืืจืื ืืขืืืื ืืืืกืืืืช, ืืืฉืืื ืืฉืคืขืืช ืืฉืืืืช ืืื’ ืืื’.
ืืืฉื ื ืืืื, ืฉืื’ ืืื ืืื ืืืืื ืืช ืื ”ื, ืื ืื ืืืื3.
ืืื ืื’ ืืื ืืขื ืขืชื ืขื ืื ืื ืืืช ื ืฉืืื ืื”ื, ืื ื”ืง ืืืื”ืจ ืืืงื ืืขื ื”ืง ืื”ื ืืืื”ืจ ืื”ื ืืขื ืืืื, ืืฉืจ ืืืื ืื ืืกืืืื ืืืืืืืงืื: ืืฉืคืืขื ืืคื ืืืืืช ืืืืงืืฃ, ืืชืืจื ืขืืืื ืืื”ื, ืืจืืื ืืืช ืืืืฉืืืืช. ืืืืืื ืืืชื ืืชืงืฉืจืืชื ืขื ืืฉืืืืื ืืืืื ืืื ืชืจื”ื ืืืจื ื ืคืฉ ืืืืฃ ืืืงืืฉืจืื.
ืืขื ืื ืืื ืืืืช ืืืชื ื ืืืื ื ืืืขืช, ืืืื ื ืืืขืืืง ืืขืชื ืืืชืงืืข ืืืฉืืชื ืืื, ืืฉืจ ืืื ืืื ืื ืฉืื ืืืจืืฉ, ืืื ื ืืขื ืืื ืื ืื ืืืฉืคืขืืช ืืืฉืืืืช ืืืจืืื ืืืช, ืืขื ืืื ืืืชืงืฉืจืืช ืืืื (ืืืืจ ืืืจื ืืืืชืืื ืืื ืืืื ืืชืงืฉืจืื) ืงืฉืืจืื, ืืืืืืืื ืืฉืจืฉ ืืฉืจืฉ ืืฉืจืฉ ืขื ืืืขืื ืืขืื ืื’.
ืื ืื ืฉื ืืืืจืกืืื
ื’ ืชืืื, ื’ืฉื”ืช,
ืืจืืงืืื, ื .ื.
1.
ืจืื ืชื ืื ืค”ื.2.
ืืืจืืืืช: ืชืืจื ืืืจ ืค’ ืืงืฅ ื”ื ืช”ืจ ืืฆืืช ื ”ื. ืกืื”ืฆ ืืืฆ”ืฆ ืืฆืืช ื ”ื ืค”ื. ื”ื ืืืขื ืืขืช, ืชืจืก”ื [ืกื”ื ืชืจืก”ื ืข’ ืื ืืืืื].3.
ืจืื ืืชื”ื ืฉื ืกืค”ื ืืืืฉืื ืืฉ ื’ ืืืื’, ืืจืืขืื ืื ืกืืืื. โ ืืืฉ”ืก (ืกืืื ื ื, ื) ื ืืฉื ืื ืกืืืื, ื”ื ืืคื ื ืฉืืื ืืขืืงืจ ืื.Menachem ShmeiParticipantAnyone is welcome to let everyone know what they think the real reason is and why thereโs so much antisemitism among Muslims hate more then Christians.
I’m not sure that this is accurate.
ืืืื ืืื ืืืืืข ืฉืขืฉื ืฉืื ื ืืืขืงื
The Muslim countries persecuted their Jews, the Christian countries persecuted their Jews (think inquisition, crusades, czarist Russia, holocaust, and much more).
Interestingly, the Rambam has FIERY words about the Muslims after escaping the Almohads:
ืืืืข ืืื ืฉืืงื”ื ืืคืืื ื ืืืืืจืืช ืขืื ืืชืื ื ืืชืื ืืืื ืื ืฉืืื ืืืืช ืืฉืืขืื ืฉืจืขืชื ืืืงื ืขืืื ื ืืื ืืชืืืืื ืืืจืข ืืืืืืก ืืืชื ื ืืื ืฉืืืจ ืขืืื ื ืืชืืจื ืืืืืืื ื ืคืืืืื ืืฉืื ืชืขืืื ืขื ืืฉืจืื ืืืื ืืืชืจ ืืืืืช ืืื ื ืืื ืืืื ืฉืืจืขื ืืชืืืืช ืืจืขื ืืืืื ืืืชื ื ืืืืงืืื ืืืชื ื ืืืืืืก ืืืชื ื ืืืืื . . ืืื ืื ื ืืขืืื ื ืกืืืืื ืฉืขืืืื ืืืืืืื ืืฉืงืจืืชื ืืืขืื ืืืืืืชื ื ืฉืืื ืืืืืืช ืืืื ืื ืืกืืื…
August 22, 2023 12:41 pm at 12:41 pm in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2218400Menachem ShmeiParticipantin Tanya perek Beis it explains that all neshamos are one body and receive everything from Hashem through the โheadโ (Tzaddikim/ Rebbes) Neshamos.
For all those who get nervous from chassidus seforim, here is an incredible Chasam Sofer (ืฉื”ืช ืื”ื ืกื’ ืงืกื):
He explains that according to the Maharal, one shouldn’t ask malachim to bring his tefillos to Hashem (doing so is “ืงืื ืืช ืืืื ื ืืืืื”), since this is only necessary for a human king, but Hashem accepts all of our tefillos directly no matter how low we are.
But, the Chasam Sofer continues, a tzaddik is different. All Yidden are one body with one soul. When one Jew is in pain, it affects everyone.
A poshute Yid is compared to the foot, while the tzaddik is the head. It only makes sense that when the foot (i.e. a Yid) is in pain, he asks the “head” (tzaddik) to daven for him, since it’s more appropriate for the head to enter the King’s chamber than the foot.ืืจื ืืืขืืื ืืืืฅ ืืื ืืื ืืืืืื ืืฉืืื ืืืืืื ืืฉืื ืืกืคืื ืืคื ื ืืืื ืื ืืื ื ืืืื ืืืืขืื ืืืจืื ืืจืืื ืืืขื ืืฉืจืื ืืคื ืื ืืืืืื ืืฉืจืช ืืืื ื ืฆืจืืืื ืืืืฅ ืืคื ื ืืืื’ ืืช”ืฉ ืืืื ืืงืื ืืกืืจ ืคื ืื ืืคืืช ืืคื’ ืืืฉืื ืขืืืื ืืืืื’ ืื ืื ืืืืืฅ ืืื ืืื ื ืืื ืงืื ืืช ืืืื ื ืืืืื ืื ืื ืืฉืจืื ืฉืืชืคืื ืืืืฃ ื’ ืื ืคืฉ ื’ ืืืฉื’ ืืฆืืขืจ ืื ืืืืจื ืืจืืืฉ ืืขืื ืืฆืขืจ ืืขื”ื ืืืชืคืื ืขื ืืืจื ืฆืจืื ืฉืืืื ืขืฆืื ืขืืื ืคื’ ืฉืืจืื ืืืื ืื ืืื ืืืื ืืืืื ืฉืฉื ืืื ืืฆืขืจ ืืื ืืืชืจ ืฉืืื ืก ืืจืืฉ ืืฉืืื ืก ืืจืื ืข”ื ืืฉื ืืช”ื ืืื ืืจืืฉ ืืืืฆืืขืจ ืฉืืื ืขืชื ืฉืจืื ืืืื ืืื ืืืืื ืช ืจืื ืืงืฆืช ื ืืืฃ ืืื ืืืื ืืก ืืจืืฉ ืืืื ืฉืฉื ืืื ืืขืื ืืืจืื ืืื ืืืืืฅ ืืขื ืืืจ
August 22, 2023 9:44 am at 9:44 am in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2218380Menachem ShmeiParticipantMenachem Shmei who want[s] me to study the sugya which โprovesโ that the Rebbe is…
Qwerty,
You saying that I’m trying to prove to you that the Rebbe is … is like if I were to say that you’re trying to convince us to watch TV.
Menachem ShmeiParticipantThis thread has me completely lost.
I’m having a hard time following the relevance of the different posts.
I feel like I’m looking at a piece of modern art!
August 21, 2023 10:19 pm at 10:19 pm in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2218268Menachem ShmeiParticipantwhy was west coast chabad leader shlomo cunin not worried about publicizing his belief that โthe rebbe runs the world,โ
This is definitely a mainstream Chabad statement, I won’t argue with you on that one.
I don’t think he meant it in the way that you’re taking it.
Honestly, I’ve seen people rail about this for years in the CR, while the statement doesn’t seem so problematic to me (as opposed to the “Who Elokeinu” line, or if he would have said that he “creates the world” or the like).Rabbi Cunin obviously isn’t saying chas v’shalom that the world isn’t in Hashem’s hands.
He literally says 30 seconds earlier “ืืขืจ ืืืืืขืจืฉืืขืจ ืืืขื ืืขืืคื that we will have gevaldike nissim…”With his “runs the world” statement he seems to be saying that being that they are the Rebbe’s shluchim, doing his work, the Rebbe takes a level of achrayus over them, and hopefully the world will see that the tzaddik protected them (unfortunately, we weren’t zoche to nissim).
There is an idea of tzaddikim having a level of control and responsibility for what happens in the world (given to them by Hashem).
This is the idea of ืฆืืืง ืืกืื ืขืืื – that his zechus protects the world and keeps it going.There is a vort in Midrash Talpiyos, brought in many chassidus sforim (Kedushas Levi, etc.) on the Gemara ืื ืืขืืื ื ืืืื ืืฉืืื ืื ืื ื ืื ื:
ืืืื ืืจืื ืืขืืช ืืฆืืืง ืืคื ื ืืงื”ื, ืืฉืืกืจ ืืขืืื ืืจืฉืืชื ืืฉืืขืื ืื ืืขืฉืืช ืื ืจืฆืื ื ืื’. ืืืืขื ืฉืืืื ืฉืืขืืื ื ืืจื ืืฉืืื ืืฆืืืง ืืืืื ื ืืจืื ืืฆืืืชื ืืืืื”ื, ืืื ืืกืจ ืืงื”ื ืื ืืขืืื ืืืื ืืฉืืขืืื ืชืืชืื ืืงืืื ืื ืื ืฉืืืืืจ…
It goes on to say that if only everyone in the world knew this, that the world is in the hands of tzaddikim, they would give the tzaddikim tremendous honor.I think that is his point. The hope that the people of the world will recognize that they’re under the reshus of the tzaddik.
August 21, 2023 10:34 am at 10:34 am in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2218095Menachem ShmeiParticipantAs Iโve clearly articulated, I will not get involved in any discussion about a dead Jew being god.
I don’t think you understood my post.
My point was showing you that there are statements from many other widely accepted Torah sources that may seem radical or ch”v AZ at first glance without proper background.
Closing your ears and saying “I can’t listen to this gadol because something he said sounded like AZ to me” is very ืงืืืื ืงืขืคืืืืง.Whatever.
P.S. Since some people here are indeed a bit ืงืืืื ืงืขืคืืืืง, and especially naรฏve about Lubavitch – I feel the need to point out the obvious:
It seems to me that Yechi’s post is sarcasm.
Just putting it out there to set the record straight.August 21, 2023 10:34 am at 10:34 am in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2218094Menachem ShmeiParticipantAnd I remember an article that appeared in Beis Moshiach many years ago
I assume that you were not a avid reader of Beis Moshiach. Probably, the way that you know about the idiotic article is because David Berger made a big deal about it (he mentions it at least three separate times in his book).
“Beis Moshiach” was established as an anti-establishment magazine in the 90s by some people who felt that Kfar Chabad magazine (the official chabad magazine for decades) wasn’t radical enough for them.
Nowadays, Beis Moshiach has become a bit more mainstream (while still very meshichist), and they would never print such an article today.
The very fact that David Berger had to bring all of his “proofs” from various marginalized and anti-establishment material (such as Beis Moshiach, as well as from “Sichat Hageula” which was created to compete with the mainstream “Sichat Hashavua” etc.) – most of which wouldn’t dream of printing those statements today – shows how much this is accepted in Chabad…
Interestingly enough, after David Berger mentions this article several times in his book, he points out (in the appendix) that the article’s author later retracted what he said, and in his later works he “vigorously denies that G-d can be a human being.”
I know someone who says… โBaruch the Rebbeโ
I can’t deny that you know someone like this, but I do find it ironic that as a Lubavitcher who meets thousands of other Lubavitchers from many different groups (including some very radical “meshichists”) I’ve never met someone like this.
Maybe the Lubavitchers who believe this are afraid to share their views with other Lubavitchers for the fear of being ostracized or something, which again shows how much this is accepted in Chabad…
August 21, 2023 12:57 am at 12:57 am in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2218000Menachem ShmeiParticipantQwerty,
I asked you this question several times, but haven’t received a response, so I’ll ask it a different way:
You seem very strong that the statement “ืืืก ืืื ืขืฆืืืช ืืืืืช ืืืืื ืืื ืขืจ ืืื ืืื ืืจืืื ืืขืฉืืขืื ืืื ื ืืืฃ
” is most definitely AZ, and it’s impossible for there to be any alternative explanations.My question is, what if I were to say:
“Hashem took the four letters of His holy name (ืืื’) and garbed them in a hat and kapoto, and this is the Rebbe…”
Or: “Who is the face of ื-ื-ื-ื? The Rebbe.”
Or: “When the posuk says that Hashem is in His holy chamber, this refers to the Rebbe when he’s in shul”
Or: “How can the Rebbe heal people if he is mortal and only G-d can give life? Since a tzaddik is one with G-d, he has the power of infinity since his life is Hashem’s essence, therefore he can give life to a sick person.”Would you also call this AZ?
And if not, why not?August 20, 2023 10:22 pm at 10:22 pm in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2217957Menachem ShmeiParticipantwhen they pray they have in mind hashem the way hes ืืืืืฉ in mmโs
Should I point out again that this is not true? That I don’t know a single Lubavitcher like this?
You may be confusing with going to the ohel and asking the Rebbe to intercede on our behalf from Hashem, which is allowed/encouraged by poskim as I’ve mentioned in previous posts.
But when a Lubavitcher davens shmone esrei, they don’t have in mind the Rebbe.
No matter how many times this lie is repeated, it will not change the metzius.August 20, 2023 10:21 pm at 10:21 pm in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2217955Menachem ShmeiParticipantIโve downloaded the lecture and plan on listening to it.
Great! Let us know your thoughts. I haven’t listened to it in a while, so I’ll need to relisten.
Again, if I remember correctly, he doesn’t specifically mention the vort of the Rebbe. He gives a comprehensive overview on the matter as it is brought throughout Torah.does Chabad chasidus consider โatzmus umahusโ to literally mean โessence and being/makeup (of G-d)โ
To the best of my knowledge, yes. Something along those lines.
August 20, 2023 7:57 pm at 7:57 pm in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2217940Menachem ShmeiParticipantTo Menachem Shmeiโs credit, heโs able to understand… Unfortunately the black hatters are so dogmatic
I hope you don’t mind, but I’m gonna share a little secret:
Technically, I’m a black hatter too!August 20, 2023 5:48 pm at 5:48 pm in reply to: Jewish books on the paranormal/mysterious/ufos/conspiracy theories #2217806Menachem ShmeiParticipantwhy isnโt English a holy language?
I think the difference between English and Aramaic, Yiddish, Ladino, etc. is that English is not unique to Jews at all. Even the “yinglish” that many frum Yidden speak is almost the same as regular English, with some minute differences.
Whereas the other Jewish languages that were spoken by Jews who were secluded from the goyim are only vaguely similar to their root languages.
Someone who speaks Yiddish will have a hard time understanding German, and vice-versa.August 20, 2023 1:40 pm at 1:40 pm in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2217753Menachem ShmeiParticipantThe Rabbi asked me a question and I told him that I know the answer but I canโt explain it He told me if you canโt explain it you donโt know it.
ืขืก ืืืขื ื ืืื ืืืื ื’ืจืขืื
Many (most?) sugyos in Torah demand lots of background and discussion in order to understand properly. The CR is not very conducive to this.
I would gladly give you a two hour shiur on the subject, but the anonymity of the forum prevents this.
Therefore, if you actually care to understand, I suggest you listen to the informative and clear English shiur by Rabbi Jacobson that I mentioned earlier.
August 20, 2023 1:40 pm at 1:40 pm in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2217751Menachem ShmeiParticipantQwery,
Something about you that I actually admire is that you seem to have a uniquely close and personal connection to your rabbanim, with a very open relationship where you take guidance for many aspects of your life.
Not everyone is so lucky.
August 20, 2023 2:01 am at 2:01 am in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2217607Menachem ShmeiParticipantEggMob,
Whenever I discussed this statement, all I did was bring sources from previous gedolim with similar statements. My goal was to show that it’s ridiculous when people shut off to Chabad because of “AZ” but they are ready to blindly accept the same ideas when quoted from anyone else.
I never attempted to explain the actual meaning of this, since it is a lengthy topic, as n0mesorah mentioned.
I suggest checking out the shiur of Rabbi YY Jacobson that I mentioned in post #2216858.
It is a long shiur, as is befitting such a topic. If you are indeed interested in understanding this, I would suggest you take the time to watch the entire thing.
Menachem ShmeiParticipantWhat is the standard for โnormalโ these days? Given some of the other craziness going on in the frum velt, the Chabadniks… seem quite normal. I’d be more concerned about some of the fringe elements of other chassidus and the Litvishshe tzibur…
Listen, every community has its crazies. That’s how Hashem created the world.
Even here in the CR, there are many posters whom I may disagree with on many issues, yet I consider them very normal and bright.
There are some other posters (I have one recent poster particularly in mind) whom I consider completely nuts (at least they provide comic relief).Reb Mendel Futerfas would tell a story:
In the town of Lubavitch, there was a “meshugener fun shtot”.
He always tried to approach the Rebbe Maharash, but the gabbaim stopped him. Once, he saw the Rebbe passing in his carriage, so he jumped in.
After conversing with the Rebbe, he jumped out, and was met by a group of chassidim who inquired what they spoke about.
He said: “My colleague, the meshugener of Vitebsk, invited me to join him. Since Vitebsk is a large city, there’s enough “business” for both of us.
First, of course, I had to consult with the Rebbe. The Rebbe said that I should stay since Lubavitch needs its own meshugener.”When asked what made him ask the Rebbe for advice, the meshugener responded:
ืืฉืืืข ืืฉืืืข, ืืืขืจ ืฉืื ืืืจืฃ ืืขื ืืืืMenachem ShmeiParticipantIn addition to the issue of teaching goyim Torah, there seems to be a greater underlying threat here.
Here’s some more from the article:
“The new program is a joint initiative of YU and the Philos Project, an organization that says it โseeks to promote positive Christian engagement in the Near East.โ Philos is a partner of Passages โ a Birthright-style program that brings young Christians on group tours of Israel…
The launch of the Christian studentsโ program is a sign of a growing bond between Orthodox Jews and religious Christians, who have increasingly found common cause on everything from conservative domestic politics to support for Israel.”This is part of the general evangelical pro-Jewish/Israel craze that is happening. This is probably the greatest current threat to the Jewish people.
Jews haven’t died throughout history solely because they were born Jews. They died because they refused to accept Christianity, because we consider the death of our soul worse than the death of the body.
The evangelicals, with all their “Israel support” etc. have a sinister mission to grab more Jews than ever before, which is worse, in a way, than the mass murders of previous generations.
I personally know Jewish families who have pulled their children out of Hebrew School and placed them into church school, r”l, due to the influence of Jews for Jesus ym”sh.
We have so many taka takanos in place to distance us from the goyim, even limiting the bread we eat.
In an institution that calls itself a yeshiva, how can they make a program that encourages “interfaith dialogue” – a clear violation of ืื ืชืชืืจื ืืืจื ืืืืื ืืืืจื ืขืื ืืื!?
Hopefully, this terrible threat will be stopped in its tracks.
P.S. I have nothing against YU, as I know very little about it. I am reacting solely to the information given in this article.
August 18, 2023 3:55 am at 3:55 am in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2217213Menachem ShmeiParticipantIf you wish to be successful in raising the level of your learning, you need to limit your time in the coffee room.
How dare you insinuate that qwerty doesn’t spend time learning!?
He learns gemara for SEVEN HOURS a day.
Runs a medical practice for several hours.
Watches TV for an hour.
Asks his rabbanim shaalos about what was discussed in the CR.Obviously, he only spends about 20 minutes in the coffeeroom.
How then does he do so much writing?
Well, thanks to his superior writing abilities and logic, it’s not much of a surprise. What you, the groceryman, can to in an hour, takes qwerty 5 minutes. CheckmateAugust 17, 2023 6:53 pm at 6:53 pm in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2217148Menachem ShmeiParticipantLostspark, I demand that you apologize to all doctors for insulting the medical profession, and until you do so, you better not post anything here, or else you will not be zoche to join the geula, since all the doctors will chase you away from the MO moshiach. Checkmate.
August 17, 2023 5:47 pm at 5:47 pm in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2217126Menachem ShmeiParticipantWhen I joined this discussion you made a distinction…
Qwerty, were you saving that all the while for when you’re asked a straightforward question that you have nothing to answer?
Anyway, these are the posts where I explained the difference:
#2210713 & #2211434Now, please point out to me a single post number where I called the Rebbe god (other than quoting the sicha in Likkutei Sichos vol. 2).
If you fail to do so, I don’t care what excuses you have – it clearly shows that you can’t actually prove that “Shmei has consistently stated, in no uncertain terms…”
August 17, 2023 4:21 pm at 4:21 pm in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2217114Menachem ShmeiParticipantShmei has consistently stated, in no uncertain terms, that the Rebbe is god. I can agree with you that the Rebbe didnโt mean this
Please point out where I said anything like this, other than quoting the Likkutei Sichos volume 2 and previous gedolim?
August 17, 2023 3:37 pm at 3:37 pm in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2217091Menachem ShmeiParticipantI accept every expression of legitimate Torah Judaism. Chabad, of course, is excluded because, as Menachem Shmei has told us, they believe the Rebbe is god.
qwerty,
You still haven’t explained why you consider the Minchas Elozor, Noam Elimelech, Rabbeinu Bachya, Yerushalmi and Zohar legitimate Judaism after everything I quoted from them in post #2213451…
(I think I asked this about 5-6 times)
Is this where I’m supposed to write “checkmate”?
August 17, 2023 3:34 pm at 3:34 pm in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2217089Menachem ShmeiParticipantI have a question for Menachem, n0m, sechel and all the other Lubavichers on this thread…
the official Lubavich line was that every generation must have someone who is fit to be Mashiach. So my question is, who is it in our generation?This isn’t a just a Lubavitch line (although we are indeed very into it). It’s a Bartenura, Chasam Sofer, S’dei Chemed, and others.
Who it is? As I’ve posted quite a number of times, I feel uncomfortable answering this question in the CR, since it is a sensitive idea that needs a lot of background and is a lot easier to discuss in person.
So, sorry, I’ll have to decline.P.S. I highly doubt that n0mesora is a Lubavitcher.
Unless this is a game of chess with two teams, in which he might be pushed onto the Chabad team.
But then I would possibly end up on the non-Chabad team, since I agreed with Coffee Addict somewhere above.
Wow, the chess metaphor makes everything so confusing!August 17, 2023 2:16 pm at 2:16 pm in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2217059Menachem ShmeiParticipantYserbius, which of my statements are you responding to?
Menachem ShmeiParticipantI must admit, I side with ARSo on this one
Menachem ShmeiParticipantSomeone better check up if they were thinking of selling their chometz to him next Pesach!
lol!
This one really made my day! ๐August 17, 2023 11:13 am at 11:13 am in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2216966Menachem ShmeiParticipantHad the Rebbe issued clearcut statements this mess would have been avoided, but he chose not to do so.
It was clear enough for those it was intended for. The haters will always hate.
What do you have to say for all the other gedolim I mentioned whose words could be easily misinterpreted by their opponents?I hope Moshiach turns out to be MO because a bigot like you wonโt accept him and youโll miss out on all the enjoyment of Geulah.
Oy, Hashem yerachem. Please, take a deep breath and drink a glass of water before responding to people.
Despite all of your great superiorities that you often write about (logic, truth, writing ability, etc. etc.), maybe even you sometimes go too far?August 17, 2023 10:24 am at 10:24 am in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2216940Menachem ShmeiParticipantQwerty: Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery
No always is it flattery. Sometimes, the best way to attack someone is with his own strategies…
ืืื ืื ืืืื ืืื ื ืืืื ืืื ื ืจืื
ืื ืืจืืืืช ืืื ืื, ืื ืื ื ืืืื ืืจืืืืช, ืืื ืืื ืืฉืจ ืืื, ืื ืื ื ืื ืจืืงื ืืืืชื ืืืฉืจื
ืื ืืืืชืื ืฉื ืืงื”ื ืืื ืื ืื ืืื
August 17, 2023 10:22 am at 10:22 am in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2216941Menachem ShmeiParticipantDonโt be surprised by any tactic that Rabbi Shmei uses. He has to defend his god and his false religion.
Easy way to win any argument that you can’t answer. Turn your opponents into the devil.
Sorry qwerty, I don’t think ARSo will fall for this.
-
AuthorPosts