ujm

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 301 through 350 (of 5,496 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • ujm
    Participant

    “I would cool it a bit on that “far, far better” stuff. The Muslims in the Middle Ages were in fact far better than the Christians, but they went through centuries of decline and radicalization, way before Zionism, and the Christians went through the Renaissance and Enlightenment which weakened the power of the Church. By the time Europe had come up with new secular “reasons” to be antisemitic, the Muslims had caught up with or surpassed them.

    Yaakov:

    Tach V’tat, the Pograms, the Holocaust and many other incidents were after “the Renaissance and Enlightenment”. Yes, absulutely, even after the Renaissance and Enlightenment (until the Baflour Declaration made under Zionist pressure) Jews living under Muslim rule had it “far, far better” than the Jews living in Europe or under Christian rule.

    Rav Shach was not speaking theoretically at all. He answered real Sheilos both during the Camp David Accords and the Oslo Accords. Do you seriously think Rav Shach held it would be OK to surrender Israeli sovereignty ENTIRELY to the Arabs? Or are you again playing your game of moving the goal posts?”

    Yes, absulutely, as HaGaon HaRav Elazar Menachem Man Shach zt”l said, anything that results in peace is worth surrendering Israeli land for. Even the entire State, if that would result in greater peace. HaGaon HaRav Elazar Menachem Man Shach zt”l’s main point is peace is more important than land. Even giving up sovereignty of ALL the land.

    ujm
    Participant

    “He wasn’t speaking theoretically. He was asked by the Chareidi politicians whether to vote in favor of the “Oslo Agreement”. He never for a second suggested the State of Israel surrender its entire sovereignty to the Arabs or anyone else, which is what you are suggesting. He also qualified his psak, as you said “IF in fact surrendering land to the Arabs would result in peace.” That’s a really big IF, don’t you think so?”

    Shimon:

    HaGaon HaRav Elazar Menachem Man Shach zt”l point is the same if surrendering the entire State would result in peace, HaGaon HaRav Elazar Menachem Man Shach zt”l psak is then it is obligatory to surrender the entire State.

    Yes, absolutely, as I said earlier, HaGaon HaRav Elazar Menachem Man Shach zt”l said if it results in peace.

    in reply to: The Ba’al Shem Tov Today #2479902
    ujm
    Participant

    qwerty: The entire MO movement is misguided; and that’s being very charitable.

    The modus operandi of MO is to water down Judaism to its lowest common denominator to make it palatable and acceptable to anyone.

    qwerty, if Rabbi Schachter or Rabbi Willig ever said the State and Zionism was an error or that women should be strongly encouraged to not have a career and be stay at home or that women should not be learning Torah Shebal Peh or that people should not be going to universities these days due to the rampant apikorsus and pritzus or that young men should be strongly encouraged to go to Kollel or that everyone is required to have a strong filter on any Internet connection or that mixed seating at weddings are not permitted, they’d be run out of town by the MO crowd faster than you can say goodbye and be out of their job. They know where their bread is buttered and most toe the line.

    Just a couple of weeks ago Rabbi Schachter publicly apologized for a letter he wrote to a judge encouraging that a Jewish prisoner be released. Nothing changed between the time he wrote the letter until he apologized other than the MO crowd got angry at him for writing it.

    in reply to: EST mistake #2479746
    ujm
    Participant

    Please repost it again. It may have gotten stuck in a spam filter.

    in reply to: Letter From Bereaved Families #2479736
    ujm
    Participant

    Yaakov Yosef: It is mandatory that every Torah Jew to make a ??????? against an attack on Bnei Torah, as the above signatories publicly committed in this letter.

    in reply to: Are there any limits actually enforced by the moderators? #2479719
    ujm
    Participant

    somejewiknow: In addition to what you pointed out, the Zionists collaborated and worked with the actual Nazis during the Holocaust to achieve their mutual goals.

    The most infamous, but far from only, example is the Kapo Rudolf Kastner working hand in hand for years with Nazi Adolf Eichmann ym”s. Kastner literally worked in Eichmann’s office for years and they met and worked together for years.

    ujm
    Participant

    Yaakov Yosef: No doubt we suffered in Golus *everywhere* we lived and suffered tragedies at the hands of the local Goyim regardless of location.

    That being said, what I earlier stated that prior to Zionism Jewish life under Muslim rule was far far better than Jewish life under the rule of non-Muslims is absolutely 100% undisputable fact.

    ujm
    Participant

    dbrim: Zionism started long before 1948. Chevron occured *after* the advent of Zionism.

    ujm
    Participant

    Yaakov Yosef/Yankel:

    We are following in the footsteps of HaGaon HaRav Elazar Menachem Man Shach zt”l, who also spoke theoretically when he paskened that it is absolutely worthwhile and even obligatory for the State of Isrel to surrender land to the Arabs for peace, if in fact surrendering land to the Arabs would result in peace.

    in reply to: The Ba’al Shem Tov Today #2479619
    ujm
    Participant

    mdd: I know firsthand what you erroneously think you know, but are mistaken based on second or thirdhand misinformation.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2479548
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2479445
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2479418
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: The Ba’al Shem Tov Today #2479260
    ujm
    Participant

    qwerty: They’re personally frum in their own lives but they’re misguided in how they lead their followers.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2479256
    ujm
    Participant
    ujm
    Participant

    dbrim: The Chevron massacre was a direct result of Zionism. Prior to Zionism Jewish life under Muslim rule was far far better than Jewish life under the rule of non-Muslims.

    in reply to: Letter From Bereaved Families #2479019
    ujm
    Participant

    These signatories and their so-called letter are utter fools. A bunch of am haaratzim.

    If they weren’t Jewish they could credibly be charged with antisemitism.

    in reply to: Proposed Solution to the Arab-Zionist Conflict: Non-Denominational State #2478585
    ujm
    Participant

    Yankel: You still failed to answer the hypothetical question directly. If it was absolutely established — even according to YOUR satisfaction and the satisfaction of EVERYONE — that a non-denomination/non-ethnic/neutral State in the Holy Land would be absolutely safer for Jews and less deadly for Jews than the continuing existance of the State of Israel, would you then agree in that very specific circumstance and scenario that the State of Israel should be abolished and replaced with a democratic non-denomination/non-ethnic/neutral State?

    in reply to: The Ba’al Shem Tov Today #2478586
    ujm
    Participant

    Agudas Yisroel was founded jointly by Rav Chaim Brisker, the Gerrer Rebbe, the Chofetz Chaim, the Belzer Rebbe, Rav Chaim Ozer Grodzinski, the Belzer Rebbe, Rav Meir Simcha of Dvinsk, Rav Moshe Greenwald (the Arugas HaBosem), the Czortkow Rebbe, Rav Itzele Rabinowitz of Ponevezh, and even the Munkatcher Rebbe(!! though the Munkatcher later withdrew).

    You couldn’t get a better full fledged alliance between the greatest of the greatest from both the Litvishe and Chasidishe velts.

    in reply to: The Ba’al Shem Tov Today #2478584
    ujm
    Participant

    mdd: False. The Beis Haleivi was the Rov is Slutsk and he absolutely never prevented that they be buried in the regular Jewish cemetery in Slutsk, where he was the authority. The only thing he didn’t do was use Chasidishe shechita. Nothing more or less.

    Ishpurim: You have machlokes rabbonim within every group. Whether the Litvish Ponovezh, the Sefardim, the Chasidim, R’ Yaakov Emden and R’ Yonasan Eibshitz, the Rambam and his opponents. etc. It doesn’t detract from the greatness of all sides.

    Of course there are exceptions such as Reform, Karaites, MO, Conservative, Zionism etc.

    in reply to: amount to chip in for rides #2478407
    ujm
    Participant

    Lakewood/Brooklyn might be in the $20-$30 ballpark.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2478336
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2478123
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: The Ba’al Shem Tov Today #2478119
    ujm
    Participant

    DaMoshe: Did you ever wonder why the Litvish Gedolim and the Chasidish Gedolim not only recognize and respect each others shittas, but they jointly sit in the same organizations such as Agudas Yisroel (founded by the very Litvish Chofetz Chaim jointly together with the very Chasidish Gerrer Rebbe) and consult with each other and make joint decisions on bodies such as the Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah, since the days of the Chofetz Chaim and Gerrer Rebbe through this very day today?

    While at the same time both the Litvish Gedolim and the Chasidish Gedolim freeze out all of the so-called Modern Orthodox rabbis and schools such as YU from their Rabbinic and other organizations, since they have no confidence in the Yiddishkeit of the MO.

    in reply to: The Ba’al Shem Tov Today #2478113
    ujm
    Participant

    DaMoshe: The Gra’s opposition was a generation after the Baal Shem Tov; the Gra’s opposition was to the behavior he heard about in his generation; not that of the generation of the Baal Shem Tov. Indeed, the Gra only issued his public opposition more than a decade after the Baal Shem Tov was already long niftar.

    Furthermore, the Gra’s cherem was only against those alive at the time he issued it. The Gra never issued a cherem against later generations of Chasidim, who weren’t even born in his lifetime. In fact, that would have been impossible to do.

    The better question is how you feel the right to question disagreements between bona fide tzadikim from hundreds of years before your lifetime, while at the same time supporting and being a part of the so-called “Modern Orthodox” heresy that openly tolerates and supports completely anti-Torah activities such as mixed swimming in MO bungalow colonies and elsewhere, co-ed mixing of boys and girls fraternizing and being friends with each other and having boyfriends/girlfriends, teaching clear full throttled apikorsus in YU and other MO schools, Young Israel synagogues having mixed dancing in their social halls, joining anti-Torah movements such as Reform and Conservative in joint organizations such as the Synagogue Council of America, allowing married women to go around with their hair uncovered and dressed with uncovered legs in public in Modern Orthodox neighborhoods being not only a common sight but the default dress for MO women, and a whole host of similarly terrible **current** behaviors today practiced without remorse and in public by the vast majority of the MO.

    ujm
    Participant

    Yaakov: Those people also eat bread and wear pants. Do you, similarly, suggest we never eat bread or wear pants because… the Labor Party (Democrats) and Meretz do so?

    ujm
    Participant

    Yankel: For arguments same, let’s assume the solution described in the OP could demonstrably work and there would be an even better guarantee of greater peace in that scenario than there is currently with the status quo of the State of Israel. Let’s for just a moment assume that such a peaceful coexistence would be the case.

    In such a scenario, would you be in favor of the plan described in the OP?

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2477610
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2477163
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2477164
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: Deleting account #2477125
    ujm
    Participant

    Not possible.

    Only an administrator can delete an account. Not even a moderator can; though a moderator can delete comments (one by one, manually).

    in reply to: Going OTD in the IDF #2476845
    ujm
    Participant

    Yaakov: They have more than a few dozen at any given rally that they attend.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2476437
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: Tiferes Shlomo and the modern State of Israel #2476436
    ujm
    Participant

    Yankel: My only dictionary is Oxford.

    in reply to: Declare Neturei Karta to be Non-Jewish Rodfim and Enemies of the Jews #2476431
    ujm
    Participant

    Declare Zionists to be Non-Jewish Rodfim and Enemies of the Jews

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2475410
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: The Steipler Gaon on Zionism and on the Neteurei Karta #2474719
    ujm
    Participant

    Yankel: Shkoyach.

    Now that you were moida that, are you moida that Nadler did NOT say NK but rather said Satmar?

    And are you further moida that Nadler did NOT say it in support of stopping arms to Israel but rather simply making the accurate point that anti-Zionism is not necessarily anti-Semitism (which no one ever accuses Satmar of)?

    And are you further moida that Nadler did not cause a change in American policy to restrict US arms to Israel?

    And, therefore, do you now admit that there is absolutely zero, none, nada, zilch, gornisht, not even a scintilla or iota of evidence that Neteurei Karta ever ever caused physical harm to even a single Jew anywhere in the world?

    No more than you have by eating cheesecake.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2474126
    ujm
    Participant

    Volksgerichtshof Supreme Zionist People’s Court: “State Must Enforce Criminal Sanctions Against Chareidim Within 45 Days”

    Supreme Court: “State Must Enforce Criminal Sanctions Against Chareidim Within 45 Days”

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2473990
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: Million Man March #2473989
    ujm
    Participant

    YYA: Yes; but putting simple quotation marks around your quotes is quick and easy (unlike using bold or italics).

    _______________________________________

    To use bold first put the character ” < ” then put the word “strong” then put the character ” > ” then put the word or words or sentence that you wish to appear bold.

    After the word/words/sentence that you want bolded put the character ” < ” then put “/strong” then put the character ” > ”

    Do not use any spaces (and do not use any of the quotation marks I used above when explaining) between the character before or after the word strong.

    To use italics do exactly the same as above but instead of “strong” use “em” (and “/em”)

    in reply to: The Steipler Gaon on Zionism and on the Neteurei Karta #2473987
    ujm
    Participant

    Yaakov: Are you saying that until it can be proven that eating cheesecake is directly responsible for Yidden actually getting killed ??? it’s OK to eat cheesecake? What about ??? ??????

    What they say in public causes the same safek nefoshos risks as you eating cheesecake.

    in reply to: Million Man March #2473763
    ujm
    Participant

    YYA:

    Please put quotation marks around any quote you repost from another poster.

    Otherwise readers will mistakenly attribute to you when you are quoting other people (even though you intend to disagree with them).

    in reply to: The Steipler Gaon on Zionism and on the Neteurei Karta #2473410
    ujm
    Participant

    Yaakov: Even if you were correct (you aren’t — Congressman Nadler represented Williamsburg/Boro Park and had the biggest Satmar constituency in the US), so what? That has nothing to do with the context of the point being made. Are you following the conversation?

    Yankel said NK going to Palestinian rallies effectively causes Jews to be killed. When challenged on that absurd idea he defended himself by (erroneously) claiming that the Number Four top American official, Chuck Schumer, said on the Senate floor that Neteurei Karta also opposes arms to Israel so it is therefore justified for America to stop sending some arms to Israel.

    And I simply responded that Chuck Schumer said nothing at all about that, it was Jerry Nadler that Yankel was confusing Schumer with, and even Nadler did NOT say NK but rather said Satmar. And, even then, Nadler did NOT say it in support of stopping arms to Israel but rather simply making the accurate point that anti-Zionism is not necessarily anti-Semitism (which no one ever accuses Satmar of.)

    Does Yankel now believe that Satmar is killing Jews in Israel?

    in reply to: Tiferes Shlomo and the modern State of Israel #2473409
    ujm
    Participant

    And, again, for the umpteenth time both Yaakov and Yankel attribute to me what they confused from hearing by others even though I said nothing. In fact, other than one minor comment pointing out the context of someone’s comment, I hadn’t even posted in this thread.

    in reply to: Chazon Ish [ZTL ZYA] and Military Draft Exemptions #2472630
    ujm
    Participant

    Yankel: Those are individual strategies, with purposes, that do not indicate whatsoever that HaGaon HaRav Menachem Man Shach in any way believed or supported the idea that Chareidi bochorim who are NOT learning should enlist.

    The reason disallowing non-learners from regiatering as a learner, is totally obvious: not to risk having the secular government take it away altogether, even from learners, by claiming it is being abused.

    And the license issue is also quite obvious; there legally they could be exempted at no cost to anyone else. But the Gedolim were so strong against being licensed that they threatened bochorim who did contemplate getting licensed against the directives of Gedolei Yisroel, something much much worse — being forced into the IDF.

    That was successful in stopping those thinking of it from getting licensed; no one wanted to go to the army.

    in reply to: The Steipler Gaon on Zionism and on the Neteurei Karta #2472555
    ujm
    Participant

    Yankel: Looking back at the events you keep erroneously citing, you’ve been making several additional factual errors:

    1. Schumer never defended arms embargoes against Israel and, in fact, never even supported arms embargoes against Israel.

    2. Schumer never mentioned Jewish anti-Zionists in his speeches.

    3. Schumer has relatively little influence on establishing arms embargies. And, as stated, didn’t use that little influence, in any case.

    4. You are confusing Schumer with Jerrold Nadler, who is one out of four hundred and thirty five members of the House. Nadler did cite Jewish anti-Zionists on the House floor, but not in regards to arms embargoes; he did so in simply stating that anti-Zionism is NOT necessarily anti-Semitism (which is obviously 100% correct; especially Jewish anti-Zionism, which is what he was explicitly referring to.)

    5. Even Nadler’s speech referenced only Satmar; NOT Neteurei Karta.

    Your very poor attempt to “prove”, with grossly exaggerated and factually false hyperbole, that NK going to Palestinian demonstrations is somehow a pekuach nefesh danger, has fallen flat on its face.

    This is all even if you firmly and strongly disagree and oppose NK. Nevertheless, to claim what they do is a pekuach nefesh danger is demonstrably a canard. Of course, it is the position of the NK that what they do is pekuach nefesh in saving Jewish lives, by demonstrating to the world that Judaism isn’t Zionism, and Judaism is opposed to Zionism, and that the crimes committed by the Zionists in Israel isn’t from Judaism, as Jews oppose it; in the hope that if they make this loud and clear enough they might prevent some gentiles who might seek to avenge the crimes of the Zionists from doing so against innocent Jews.

    Whether that strategy is ever successful (if it is even succesful in preventing one attack against one innocent Jew, it is a success), you can debate.

    in reply to: The Steipler Gaon on Zionism and on the Neteurei Karta #2472409
    ujm
    Participant

    Yankel: I’m beginning to see you may mean well (in making factually incorrect statements) but you are politically uneducated. Schumer played absolutely no role in depriving Israel from American arms. This is an unassailable fact.

    in reply to: Million Man March #2472408
    ujm
    Participant

    No one is seeking ZSK’s “admission”, as coming from someone with demonstrable krum worldviews, it wouldn’t be worth the paper (or pixels) it is written on.

    ZSK even got the very basic facts wrong. The Sephardic rabbis leadership at JTS was quite brief. It completely ended in 1902 when Solomon Schechter, another non-Orthodox apikorus, took the leadership at JTS. Yes, that was 1902; and no one ever considered JTS to be Orthodox any time thereafter. That was long long before apikorus Lieberman joined that openly treif institution.

    Faur was a marginal figure in JTS (who quit it in disgust); he and Dimitrovsky (who was not Orthodox) were simply professors there and neither were part of the leadership.

    Reform was dominant already in the 19th and early 20th century. By time the Conservatives became larger than them (much later; and which only lasted a relatively brief period), both movements were fully apikorsum.

    The European Shtetl may have been materially a difficult place to live, but spiritually it was far far above and beyond any alternative. Better spirituality than materialism. And the churban in Europe was a physicaly one; spiritually it is the direct and unambiguous cause for the renaissance of Torah Judaism in America with the arrival of the European Torah sages to the shores in America.

    in reply to: Chazon Ish [ZTL ZYA] and Military Draft Exemptions #2472150
    ujm
    Participant

    This is a complete lie, falsehood, canard and fiction. The Chazon Ish and Rav Elazar Menachem Man Shach never ever supported Chareidi men — even though who are NOT learning Torah — from routinely enlisting in the IDF.

    The Chazon Ish objection to IDF service was based the army being a secularizing “melting pot” that is an environment as a place of shmad and spiritual destruction, with mandatory exposure to secular culture, non-observance and Shabbos desecration.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2472049
    ujm
    Participant
Viewing 50 posts - 301 through 350 (of 5,496 total)