☕ DaasYochid ☕

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 12,701 through 12,750 (of 20,615 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: skeletons #1008677
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    FTR: I have gone to a casino, less than 10 times, I usually played roulette using “progressive gambling”.

    Not a kuntz to tell us, let’s see you tell your wife (didn’t you once post that she doesn’t know your real screen name?).

    in reply to: Overheard at kiddush club #1008608
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant
    in reply to: Mikva #1008585
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I’m not in Yerushhalayim, but thanks. 🙂

    The shittos regarding tevilah of aluminum range from patur, chayav mid’rabbonon, to chayav mid’Oraisa.

    in reply to: Million Man Atzeres #1020537
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant
    in reply to: Experiencing Shamayim #1008210
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Yitayningwut, maybe hearing such a story third hand can’t prove anything, but for a maamin, why wouldn’t you be able to take a message from a story which rings true?

    in reply to: Mikva #1008582
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    A Freilichin Purim, Yitayningwut!

    in reply to: to all my CR friends #1143286
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I don’t think you’re yotzei that way.

    in reply to: Overheard at kiddush club #1008604
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Popa, what were you doing at a kiddush club? Don’t you know the gedolim declared them assur?

    in reply to: Megilas Lester #1060689
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    OTOH, I know some kids.

    I’m pretty sure that I do too. 🙂

    in reply to: Megilas Lester #1060685
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Popa, have you seen it?

    in reply to: Megilas Lester #1060679
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Those who run, run. And those who consider it Wolf have never run.

    Is there no one in between?

    As far as I know, this letter was not spread outside of BMG. In which case it was simply Roshei Yeshiva telling their yeshiva their opinion – which is exactly what everyone here always advocates being the way to go about things.

    I agree.

    in reply to: Megilas Lester #1060676
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I seriously doubt children or adults of ANY age or intelligence will conclude that the “purim story” as portrayed in the video is based on anything other than the imagination of the videos creators. sure some ideas are based on midrashim, and actual pesukim as described in the megilla, that is to be expected. If anyone walks away from the video thinking that the reason achashverosh was awake at night was due to an upset stomache or that he wore fluffy bunny rabbit slippers or that mrs haman and vashti went to get their hair done at the mall I would worry about him/her. Of course it “distorts” the purim story, thats why it is a work of fiction. Is it any worse then “purim torah”?

    I agree.

    in reply to: Enough of the devisiveness!! #1008288
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    E-O-M, don’t you think that it may be worth defending a breach in Hashem’s kavod even if it may fall short of “blatant perpetual heresy”?

    in reply to: The mechanics and provisions of the new Chareidi draft law #1008520
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    In case there’s someone who doesn’t khap what popa is talking about, from an online encyclopedia:

    The Khappers were employed to kidnap Jewish boys (sometimes as young as eight) to fill out a quota of Jews required to enter the cantonist schools, in preparation for service in the Russian Army, in the situations where such quotas were not filled legally…

    in reply to: mordechai shmutter #1008226
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Probably, anyone posting that Mordechai Shmutter is a real person is another screen name of his mother. (You had me fooled, “gavra_at_work”).

    in reply to: Megilas Lester #1060666
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    1) It’s a made up story

    2) In the made up story, Doniel Lesterovich didn’t know that medrash

    3) Made up stories are supposed to be entertaining, not make sense

    4) Please forgive me for not listening to you

    in reply to: Megilas Lester #1060664
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I’m told that they did get approval from rabbonim before doing the video. What we have here is a machlokes. Nothing new; healthy for Yiddishkeit, as long as people don’t bad mouth either side.

    in reply to: The Shocking Headline #1007588
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    DaasYochid: I never said that was their motivation.

    But the Jewish Press op-ed did, so you should not be agreeing, even one iota.

    Miriam, this is about motivation, not about your unfortunate situation.

    Avram in MD, great post, as usual.

    in reply to: The Shocking Headline #1007578
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    that’s plain ridiculous. The chereidim are being asked to JOIN them at the front, not go out there themselves.

    So they should all die? Does that make you happier?

    Or what if I told you that if charedim would go to the front they would replace non charedim, and this is all a devious plan to kill them off that way? Does that make any more sense to you, and would that be true?

    in reply to: infallibility and chachomim #1007709
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    But that doesn’t mean that you have a crystall ball into the “mind” of Hashem, so to speak.

    That’s precisely where talmidei chachomim come in. By virtue of their knowledge of the Torah, which is Hashem’s wisdom, they have much better insight into His ratzon than we do.

    in reply to: mordechai shmutter #1008221
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I think Mordechai Shmutter posts under the name popa_bar_abba, so it’s certainly possible.

    in reply to: The Shocking Headline #1007576
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I am very disappointed in the posts by DaMoshe and interjection.

    For two posters, who are usually the strongest opponents of sinas chinom, to agree that the motivation for those who refuse to serve in the military is “so only other Jews die in war” and because “everyone else is welcome to get themselves killed”, is disgusting, and hopefully out of character.

    Can’t we agree that thinking and espousing that charedim couldn’t care less about other Jewish lives is itself a horrible sheker and based on nothing but sinas chinom?

    I’m curious what your reactions would be if someone would suggest that the reason the D’L want charedim to be drafted is so that they’ll die in war. Would you say it’s true (with a disclaimer that it should have been said a bit nicer)?)

    in reply to: infallibility and chachomim #1007701
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Also, can we take infallibility out of this? To heed the words of chachomim, you don’t need to consider them infallible, you just need to think that they have a better chance of being correct than you do (which takes seichel and anavah).

    in reply to: Which sem are you going to? #1030848
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Rabbinical Seminary of America

    in reply to: Megilas Lester #1060655
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Logician, there is also a clear warning, on screen, before the film starts, that it’s not the actual Purim story (it kind of looks like the FBI copyright warning I’ve seen on other videos).

    As you said, it’s a balancing act, so while I agree that it’s not an ideal, much as entertainment videos aren’t an ideal in general, it’s not an absolute taboo, at least in my life.

    If someone has an issue with it because it’s not authentic, or for that matter, with videos in general, I say kol hakavod, just be consistent about it.

    in reply to: Rocky Zweig is too funny! #1026149
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Oomis, I concur with golfer; you are one of, if not the, most polite and respectful posters in this forum.

    If your issue is waiting for an answer from one prospective until going out with another, I agree that that’s pointless. I think those who don’t go out until someone finishes working on a shiduch for them are being silly (if I’m understanding the scenario correctly).

    But this has nothing to do with dating in a tzniusdik way.

    Your experience, that the shidduchim process has become more conservative, is true within your framework, but in a broader historical sense, the yeshivish way is still far more liberal than how they did it in “the heim”.

    in reply to: Collecting On Purim in a Limousine #1010592
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Nfgo3, is your issue the collecting, or the limo?

    in reply to: Does anybody realize the implications? #1007680
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Akuperma, I don’t know where you get the notion that I am or ever was a supporter of zionism. I am not, and I do not need to “change sides”.

    in reply to: Rocky Zweig is too funny! #1026143
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Oomis, you’ve never (that I recall) refuted my response to your theory: do those who don’t employ the methods you object to have a higher success rate of marrying?

    in reply to: Does anybody realize the implications? #1007671
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I’ll make a point I made in an earlier thread.

    No one is being jailed for learning Torah.

    and from the earlier thread:

    However, this emotional straw man frustrates me to no end. No one is going to be put in jail for learning. They (might be) put in jail for avoiding army service, which they do by learning. But no one is making learning a crime.

    You were wrong then, and you’re wrong now.

    Aside from PBA’s point that there are definitely many who want to completely wipe out Torah, chalilah, and Torah613’s point that a Jewish run state should have more appreciation for Torah, I think your point is so semantic that it’s meaningless, and if I wouldn’t be dan you l’kaf z’chus thbat you haven’t thought this out properly, I would say disingenuous.

    The image you think is portrayed in the rhetoric, that of people being dragged out of the bais midrash for the crime of learning, reminiscent of communist Russia or the Chanukah story, is so obviously not literally true that there’s no emotional straw man here.

    Although I’m sure there are those drafting the law who would like nothing more than banning Torah study for all, no matter their military eligibility, that’s obviously not what being legislated, and nobody has any hava amina that it is.

    The objection is to criminalizing the choice for a bochur or yungerman to stay in full time learning, which as Gavra says, should be repulsive to any shomer Torah u’mitzvos, and nobody is trying to fool anyone into thinking otherwise.

    The only straw man I see here was manufactured in Las Vegas.

    I must also be moche about something you wrote earlier, “ I think the country has a right to ask the Chareidim to give back (with more than just Limud HaTorah) “.

    More than Limud HaTorah? I expect better than that from you, Sam.

    in reply to: Women Wearing Costumes on Purim? #1008201
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant
    in reply to: coffee room dying out…. #1007446
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I agree with mod-29 when there’s nobody over-bumping.

    in reply to: Megilas Lester #1060629
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Popa, yes, but there’s additional footage in which CJ Kramer (the producer – he’s Rabbi Paysach Krohn’s son-in-law) details which parts are genuine, which are not, and which are conjecture.

    in reply to: The Shocking Headline #1007556
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    why aren’t people discussing how we have to have a cheshbon hanefesh to figure out why this is happening

    I think people are, but on this forum, there are different opinions as to whether what is happening is good or bad. I don’t think it’s as common to make a cheshbon hanefesh when good things are happening as when bad things are happening.

    The gedolim in EY have said that we need to be mechazek ourselves in limud haTorah. I think we all have an imperative to make a cheshbon hanefesh, and we can certainly use improvement in our dedication to keeping and learning the Torah.

    in reply to: Megilas Lester #1060625
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I saw the ad. Why is there a character called Gimpel? There was no Yiddish at the time of the Purim story!

    This story does not take place biy’mei Achashverosh.

    in reply to: Is it appropriate to propose at kotel #1007518
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Besalel, if, “Usually everyone can agree that the bnei yeshiva are of impeccable middos and derech eretz”, then the exceptions are not a failure of the system, but a failure of those individuals.

    Not sure what the shaychus is to this thread, though.

    in reply to: The Shocking Headline #1007546
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant
    in reply to: The Shocking Headline #1007541
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Meh. No names or political parties were mentioned. A private person wrote a heartfelt op-ed, with a slight inaccuracy, against a disgusting, hate filled one in the JP. No need for an apology from YWN to that rag.

    There’s not much I can do though; I can’t double not-buy it.

    in reply to: Does anybody realize the implications? #1007613
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I think the former is true but not the latter.

    I agree.

    in reply to: The Shocking Headline #1007538
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant
    in reply to: BJJ class of 2033 #1043438
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Is it too late to apply?

    in reply to: Million Man Atzeres #1020496
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Gavra, the same DN which (in one caption) referred to it as a Satmar protest (which anyone who was there can tell you is silly), reported the numbers as 50,000.

    in reply to: Million Man Atzeres #1020495
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Sam, precisely, and it’s caused by the difficulty placed on charedim working, by government policies.

    Would it change overnight if suddenly, military exemptions were granted on grounds of religious incompatibility? Of course not, but it probably would change, gradually.

    in reply to: Megilas Lester #1060619
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Artscroll is sold out.

    in reply to: R' Chaim Kanievsky answers Purim Questions #1007224
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I agree with JayMatt. How many people will read such a sefer and come out with piskei halacha which they otherwise might not know? Sure, you could argue that they could have and should have gone through the halachos themselves, or asked their rav, but realistically, not everyone does. JayMatt certainly should be commended for spreading it to an audience which can gain from it.

    And with apologies to all, I must say that a light sefer with easily readable piskei halacha is at least as kosher for “entertainment” as what anyone reading (or writing) this does for leisure.

    in reply to: Megilas Lester #1060617
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I spoke to a few people who saw it; they thought it was well produced and very funny.

    There was concern about presenting the characters of the Megillah differently than Chaza’l, although there are very clear disclaimers.

    in reply to: Million Man Atzeres #1020491
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Sam, then why do chassidim of the same rebbes work in such higher percentages in chu”l?

    in reply to: R' Chaim Kanievsky answers Purim Questions #1007218
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Thanks, JM.

    in reply to: Megilas Lester #1060610
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Good point.

    in reply to: I love my car #1113644
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Thanks for the update.

    I couldn’t sleep at night, wondering how your car was doing.

Viewing 50 posts - 12,701 through 12,750 (of 20,615 total)