Always_Ask_Questions

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 6,651 through 6,700 (of 8,523 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Please explain Ivermectin #2015406

    Health > I guess you didn’t get the Gist of my post before. The Frum people here, at least most of them, couldn’t care less about Covid.

    I understood that before, and this probably clarifies your overall interest in treatment v. vaccine.

    This is exactly why I am proposing an improvement that does not rely on public involvement. Would administration agree to changing HVAC setting to higher outside air, changing a filter, or keeping a door/window open? If there is a cluster of cases tied to a place, hopefully administration will listen.

    In some cases, this can be done without consulting anyone. If you are able to change HVAC setting and it will cost them money for extra heating, send a donation or tell me where to send it.

    in reply to: Are movies ok? #2015384

    RebE > the problem is if one thinks he is desensitized but he is not.

    Agree. But also, there should be a tangible goal why you need it. Otherwise, even a small risk is not justified.

    in reply to: bittul torah #2015379

    Gadol > any time spent beyond that necessary to engage in essential life-supporting functions

    I think, this is a definition of Toraso Umanoso.

    I also think some people here define “learning” time narrowly. IMHO, any discussion that involves clarification or application of Torah principles qualifies. Of course, if the discussion is done badly, without integrity, trying to defend your position rather than clarify the truth, it is bad Torah learning. In that sense, CR is riskier than memorizing a Mishna.

    in reply to: Sleeping in the sukkah #2015305

    Avira > Bochurim who go a whole week without showering

    Can’t skip a good joke  let me know when you have one…edited

    Sociologically, I think this is an endearing example of how we get attached to minhagim, even when cold-headed halachik analysis differ (some might call this :minhag shtus”). If Chabad were to have started in Tzfat, this might not have happened. But it became a point of contention (whether back in Belorussia or in NYC) and so it became an important height to defend. Can someone check with Chabad of Hawaii if they also think that it is too cold outside? So, if our choice is to characterize them as rebels or istani, maybe the latter is preferable?

    In all such cases, I would be happy if people at least acknowledge that they are doing something unusual and respect the rest of klal Isroel. A similar (you may disagree) case is people who not just keep cholov isroel, but consider the plates of others “treif” and similar cases.

    in reply to: Please explain Ivermectin #2015326

    recent study from Sweden, comparing family members of an immune person v. comparable non-immune person. 50% reduction in transmission due to immune person. That is (my inference), half of transmissions are within families. This is pre-delta, same effect for disease, one or two vaccines and relatively early after vaccines. They caution that delta transmission may be higher under 1 vaccine.

    In other news, US blood donors are now 83% immune as of July, of which 20% are naturally. 65+ are 92% of which 11% naturally (age is wisdom). Blood donors are not the same as overall distribution, of course. I presume most stubborn deniers of everything, do not part with their blood easily.

    My projection: number of vaccinated people increases by 3% a month, number of cases by 2% (1% detected, 2x ratio of detected to not detected). So, US will be almost fully immune in a couple of months, not counting the most stubborn population.

    in reply to: Please explain Ivermectin #2015318

    Health,
    so if you are in Lakewood, maybe you want to follow up with the mosdos where cases are coming from and check their CO2 levels and train them to set HVAC correctly, open windows, etc in case they are not doing this. If you are short on funds or time, let’s arrange a dead drop near BMG where I can arrange to drop a monitor for you, or you can leave a list of mosdos to work with.

    in reply to: Please explain Ivermectin #2015316

    for Syag,
    I just looked up a recent case study from a Belgium 1-12 school where traced cases at school as much as they could. Teachers were masked, students were not. Ths is pre-delta. They were able to trace about half of cases to either in-school or at-home transmission. The rest are unknown. So, school and home have a significant part. Among known transmissions, 2/3 were at school, 1/3 at home. School ones were about equally distributed between adult-adult, adult-child, child-child.

    in reply to: Sleeping in the sukkah #2015306

    the story I brought above brings a nafka mina for this minhag: when someone else sleeps in a Chabad Sukkah. Are you istanis and respect the sleeping person for his strength, or are you upset that the other person does not feel the kedusha and thus you can’t fall asleep in your house while the guest is snorring outside oblivious to mittele rebbe ushpeznut.

    in reply to: Are movies ok? #2015309

    > doesn’t apply to individuals who think that they’re strong enough

    To clarify, the psak was not about watching mindless movies, but about taking a college class in comparative religions. If someone is planning to be in academia or politics, he should. If someone simply wants to satisfy his wild imagination, should not.

    It came up in Sanhedrin, where R Eleizer teaches different types of Avoda Zara to R Akiva by showing different types of magical cucumbers and explaining which ones are really hayav misa and which ones are fake. He also laments that others did not ask questions.

    The Rav said that he gets this question every year.
    Students- nu, what’s the answer?
    Rav – depends on who is asking.
    Students <shocked>.

    in reply to: Are movies ok? #2015287

    Avira > how weak can you be that you’re so easily influenced

    I have explicit psak that the answer depends on the person’s character and life plan. If you plan to go into situations where you need to know this and you can handle it, then you can or should. If not – not.

    Thus, assumption that everyone can handle external info is indeed not correct. I can imagine that a MO Rav will tell it to people who are already pre-selected for this. It does not mean that this Rav would say it to a Jew in different circumstances. Sometimes, speakers do not delineate the boundaries explicitly and address people in front of them. A mistake to assume that the same advise will be given to other people (or that this Rav is even qualified to give psak to a different group).

    in reply to: Are movies ok? #2015288

    Avira > i never said a kid will learn in practice that it’s ok, i was saying that the influence is subliminal

    I get it. Rav Twersky writes about people who work in places where inappropriate language and attitudes are used (not just coarse, but just not nice enough) and then, eventually, bring it into homes. He calls on all of us to guard ourselves when we come home (or to CR).

    in reply to: who started kiruv? #2015272

    common > I make sure the all my interactions with others should reflect a positive image

    indeed, R Salanter says that one should always advocate for Yiddishkeit, sometimes even with words.

    in reply to: who started kiruv? #2015269

    common, I understand the feeling, but is this really wrong for a non-Jew to take a picture on their own – other than the objections from my post.

    As to positive image, I was once approached by an excited Mexican-extraction soldier in Alabama, who used to know some Jews back in Mexico. He was apparently watching me for a week, and, I guess, found me worthy. We know Who is watching, but sometimes do not know who else …

    in reply to: Anti Haredi Naftali Bennett (the supposed “dati” prez.) #2015260

    DY > Yeshivos are still not fully government funded

    is there a percentage? This may be hard to get to the one number, given various subsidies – directly to students, daycare subsidies, subsidies per child, etc. Using R Schach’s reasoning – if subsidies are 80% or higher, you probably won’t be able to restore the funding without the government.

    It may be instructive to compute subsidy per person over time and overlay as a percentage of budget. If you then project population growth, ken yirbu, you can estimate a breaking point when this system becomes unsustainable. I don’t understand the data enough to compute this.

    in reply to: Anti Haredi Naftali Bennett (the supposed “dati” prez.) #2015257

    coffee > I thought the reason was because then the government will tie kfirah into giving the money

    In this particular case, R Schach gave both the answer and the reason above. I presume politicians would not “buy” an answer even from a gadol when a large monetary loss is involved 🙂

    The conditional money case is interesting and might have happened at other times. Might happen again with the current government. I think Liberman wants to introduce math and other kfiros into Charedi system. Not sure whether this currently stands.

    in reply to: Random funny jokes! #2015255

    answer to my previous question – 4.

    in reply to: Australia #2015253

    Syag, Pirkei Avos suggests davening for the government so that people will not swallow each other alive. Even non-democratic. Rosh Hashona yomi – we were dating documents using years of the current King, Jewish or even more for non-Jewish, so that we stay in the good graces of the government. We all here seem to live in free countries, whether with or without a Queen. Our ability to kvetch about the government is a privilege.

    As to democracy: you may think that some decisions are unreasonable, but they are taken via a democratic process to which those in our families who came to this country “swore or affirmed” to – unless your ancestors came as accountants on Mayflower or as slaves (or as prisoners to AU).
    Anyone is free to get out of the contract and go to a Cuba or to a North Korea.

    in reply to: Sleeping in the sukkah #2015254

    that said, people need to understand each other better.
    Once a visiting non-Chabad chusid came to sleep in a sukkah at a college Chabad House. Chabad Rov came in and said, semi-humorously, “no sleeping in my sukkah”. The guy did not say a word, got up and left before anyone realized what is happening. Closest other sukkah was 30 minutes away. The Rov did not feel well. The chusid came back for the morning minyan as if nothing happened.

    in reply to: Please explain Ivermectin #2015251

    TU > how much viral load would there be floating around without ventilation and what % is rendered non-viable or is expelled altogether

    Rather than relying on the studies, I did tests myself using air quality monitor:
    A fully closed small office with 6 computer seats and reasonable ventilation: CO2 level stays normal with 1 person, starts going up after 10 minutes with 2 people. With one door open to an internal corridor, stays normal with 3 people. PPMs stayed low in all cases (except when there was a BBQ outside), that is this particular HVAC was filtering something out, but HVAC outside air intake is low.

    A shul with 10 people with place for 40 – CO2 goes up with HVAC and everything closed. Is normal with a door and 3 windows half-open.

    This adds – just opening the door to the corridor helps.

    in reply to: Please explain Ivermectin #2015248

    2scents:> You are basing this on the assumption that.

    > a. More exposure equals greater viral load.
    yes, if two people are nearby, one is puffing virus, virus stays in the aerosol, ventilation is not working, the second person continues inhaling aerosol. I saw similar logic in multiple research papers on the topic.

    > b. Once someone is infected, additional contact with other infected persons will result in a greater viral load.

    only in a short time period. If one exposure leads to immune system reacting, then further exposures days later will be mitigated by the developed antibodies.

    > c. Greater viral load is a factor as to how effective the immune response will be.

    Yes. Virus starts with the initial intake, and then starts replicating. At the same time, immune system starts reacting. It is a race depends on initial starting point and quality of carious systems. Again, this is documented.

    > d. Better ventilation reduces viral load and additional infections.

    Yes, Ventilation removes aerosol containing virus. Best is increase in outside air intake. Many HVACs have a control – put outside intake to the maximum possible. Opening windows is as good. If can’t do it continuously, open windows every 30 minutes or so.

    Historical trivia: some houses built in 1920s have huge heat radiators covered by metal enclosures. They were built (sans enclosures) after 1918 flu with the goal of being able to open windows to ventilate and run heating at the same time. When Great Depression came and also fear of flu decreased, they put enclosures to slow down heating as it was too expensive.

    If air is circulated, filters should be MERV-15, I think, or better – need to check what HVAC can handle. The higher the filtration, the harder HVAC needs to work, there might be a limit.

    Also, see that HVAC is not blowing directly from one person to another.

    There were early suggestions to use dividers. This changed – dividers may create areas of non-circulating air. So, ok to put a couple in strategic areas – near a teacher or a cashier, for example, but not on all sides near every student.

    in reply to: Australia #2015241

    It is possible. As my daughter said 1.5 years ago: “if everyone in the country stayed at home for 2 weeks, this will be finished”. Then, she corrected herself “the whole world”…

    But the question also is: if a reasonable democratic government selects a policy, are we allowed to disregard it because we disagree with part of it. If there is, say, a vaccine mandate, are we allowed to forge a document to go do a mitzva?

    The question is really “what is the right thing to do”, not “what we can get away with”. Because, if Hashem does not agree with us, there is no point in trying to get to the minyan when shaarei shamayim are closed.

    in reply to: Are movies ok? #2015234

    RebE > Fiddler of Roof also teaches that going a little off the derech leads to going off the derech ending with marrying a goy.

    This also teach about what was happening with the Jews at that period. A deep view at one family v. reading books on sociology. And, of course, it is much more likely that the kids now will view the movie than read a sociology book.

    The questions that Avira raises depend on the person and background. One of my friends, a Chabad Rabbi in Midwest, had a kid watching a movie together with regular Jewish school kids. While all kids were enjoying the action, this kid ran out crying… So, will some kids learn from Disney that it is OK for a single lady to stay with seven little gentlemen? for some it sounds preposterous, for others it may be the case.

    in reply to: Please explain Ivermectin #2015120

    2scents, Syag – prolonged contact seems to be more dangerous.

    A simple explanation, not sure whether it captures the whole phenomenon: a person gets initial load, immune system starts reacting. Now, it is a race – virus propagating deeper and doing it’s job or immunity building up. So, the more initial load is, the more chances that the virus will win over immunity. There are a lot of secondary indicators of this: cases at home; increase in cases in US South during summer (AC, less outdoors) and in the North during winter (heat, less outdoors).

    Other than that, may depend on the lifestyle. I presume that the kids spend most of the day at school, adults at work and in shul and beis midrash. If someone spends the day in the airport, talking to passerbys in the mall, in medical offices, then, of course, they are at risk there also.

    But I presume that airports and malls do HVAC and most responsible medical offices (most of our doctors sent us email about that months ago). I helped a couple of mosdos on this, but don’t know what the overall picture is.

    in reply to: Sleeping in the sukkah #2015113

    back to the sukkah, I think there are legitimate reasons to consider this whole dor istanis, given our lifestyle. We also have different attitudes towards dwellings – we do not have dirt floors, people travelling for work sleep in separate rooms instead of the inn bar, etc. Add to that Ashkenazi habit of not sleeping in the sukkah for hundreds of years due to weather and even if NY is slightly warmer than Lyadi, the danger outside (where the honest people are behind bars) compensates. We all know that it is easier to accept a new explanation to a minhag than to change the minhag! You would not be wearing Polish clothes otherwise. So, there is some support to Lubavicher sensitivity to people’s sensitivities.

    Even if you look at classical examples of instanis from a quick Google. I am 4 out of 6, and I know those who are 6 out of 6 🙂 What are you?

    1. walking in non-leather shoes on 9AV [Rabbi Shlomo Oiyrbach allows because nowadays we all “istanis” (הליכות שלמה ה, טז-יז).]
    2. someone who is disgusted by drinking from a cup where someone else drank (Tamid 27b)
    3. someone too delicate to work (Sotah 11a)
    4. someone too delicate to bathe in cold water (Yoma 31b and Yoma 34b)
    5. an overly sensitive person whose days are made worse from constantly encountering unpleasant situations (Sanhedrin 100b and Bava Batra 145b)
    6. requiring a daily bath (Berachot 16b)

    in reply to: Anti Haredi Naftali Bennett (the supposed “dati” prez.) #2015099

    I understand that there are 2 issues: influence on the country and economic matters.

    On the first, I hope all flavors of religious Jews can come to a common platform. Maybe this requires some accommodation by increasing number of non-Haredim in positions of religious power. This will make the religious coalition stronger, not weaker, by bringing everyone, within halacha, into one bloc.

    On the second, it is unsustainable to require unwilling Israeli public to continue paying tzedokah and not complain. When Begin proposed to pay fully for Charedi schools, Rav Schach instructed Charedi politicians not to accept anything beyond the previous partial arrangement. His argument was: at some point, a different government will not be willing to pay, and you will dismantle your own support system already. Not sure why R Schach’s position is rejected now, unless I am not aware that he changed it later on.

    in reply to: Australia #2015058

    aposhiteyid, here in US we had such lockdowns for very short time period early on.

    I saw R Heineman (Baltimore) being asked whether several families can stand in their backyards and daven together. This would be within rules and the questioner was concerned whether this will constitute “one minyan”. The Rov answered that a passerby may not see a difference between standing on one yard or many yards, he’ll just see Jews doing something. As the result, he opined, when there will be a lack of ventilators, someone might decide not to give it to the Jewish person.

    Rov was using accumulated century of Jewish wisdom of how non-Jews may be suspicious of us. You are looking at the sunny side of a modern society, expecting everyone to look favorably at you. It might be so for a moment – until it is not.

    in reply to: How many active people are on cofferoom? #2015057

    how many people are not posting but reading? Site owners might count unique IPs

    in reply to: Are movies ok? #2015056

    ujm > Once you saw it you cannot unsee it.

    I am suggesting using software to delete or maybe “cover” the scenes. I am sure there is something out there, social media routinely censors nudity.

    in reply to: Are movies ok? #2015055

    maskil, I am not advocating movies, just trying to be helpful to those who are looking for some. I agree with Avira on most of his points here.

    The sad fact is that current generation is reading less and prefer visual-audio information. Maybe they just want easy information. This is general society trend and it is propagating into Jewish community. So beyond social distancing, we need some medicine and vaccine for it also.

    an old joke:
    – do you have a book “how to read a book”
    – yes, we do
    – do you have it on tape?

    in reply to: who started kiruv? #2015054

    Shimon > that her answering her questions inspired her to become a baalas teshuva
    +1
    Many people understand that. I was at the kosel many years ago and saw some Nordic people approaching a couple of haredim asking nicely whether they can make a photo. Haredim answered something confusing in a mixture of English and Yiddish. When the tourists left, I asked them curiously what is the isur in making photos (this was obviously pre-instagram). They answered in perfect English that they do not want their photos to end up in some Nordic houses of worship, but if I want to make pictures and take them to US and maybe inspire some Jewish people, they’ll be happy to oblige.

    in reply to: Please explain Ivermectin #2015053

    for the practitioners out here,
    so you get calls from people who got sick. These people are indicators that they were in unsafe environment. Especially if these people are from Jewish communities, maybe you can trace then to shul and schools they and their families attend? You can then review wit these schools their safety protocols, starting with most likely problem – ventilation.

    in reply to: Please explain Ivermectin #2014857

    whomever you are quoting on Bangladesh study raises a couple of interesting questions based on the fact taht a study like that is not blinded – people know that they are getting masks. But they skew the results somewhat – 7% number is for cloth masks, higher for surgical masks – and when compliance is only 40% indeed.

    Biggest objection seems to be – the commenter can not envision what is a mechanism of different rate of decreasing symptoms between older and younger.

    Effects on older people were indeed more significant. Was it partially due to increased distancing (as reported)? possibly. I don’t see anything bad in that. The whole goal of the study was to find public policies that work. Remember early incorrect predictions by virologists playing public policy experts saying that masks will cause decrease in SD? That seems to be wrong.

    But a simple explanation that removes the objection is that effect of the doze does not have to be proportional. An older person might get such more significantly with more exposure and masking mitigates those cases.

    Another note: mask compliance in “blue America” is well south of 100%.

    Again, the objections raise a couple of interesting points. I would try blinding it, for example, by providing defective surgical masks as controls. But a claim that “fancier” masks lead to consistently different rate of reporting is grasping for straws. To the strength of the study, there are multiple other intervention that they tried that did not show any effect. So, there is no easy bias introduced into this data.

    in reply to: Are movies ok? #2014842

    Silent movies? Charlie Chaplin?
    you don’t need a korbin, you can use software to auto-skip inappropriate scenes

    in reply to: who started kiruv? #2014781

    Far, I understand quoted sources that he did try to admonish people, just did it in a negative way. That clarifies the difference with Avraham. Idea: maybe Avraham provided his own food so that they could actually bench. If they eat their own food, it might have been gezelah and ineligible for brocha.

    in reply to: Rabbi Moshe Tendler AH #2014773

    several interesting quotes and footnotes from JOHN D. LOIKE AND MOSHE D. TENDLER Molecular Genetics, Evolution, and Torah Principles, 2006. I am not trying to summarize the paper, just finding interestig references for further research:

    genetic drift: Because human beings have only a small number of offspring, not all of the parents’ genes will necessarily be passed on to their progeny. In contrast, species that have many offspring tend to distribute all of the parents’ genes to various progeny of the next generation. Thus, a small surviving population is going to be affected more dramatically by natural disasters (such as earthquakes, floods, volcanoes, or fires) or by war and may not be representative of the original population in its genetic makeup.

    Neziv affirms that, prior to Abraham, randomness existed in all areas except when it impacted upon humankind as a whole and threatened the divine plan for the world. However, Abraham brought God “down to earth” to govern humankind with hashgah. haperatit and thus altered the relationship between God and humankind such that hashgahah became a force in the world

    Hullin 7b R Hanina v Rava whether Hashem controls every event
    See Mo‘ed Katan 28a, where Rava states that “length of life, children and sustenance depend
    not on merits but on mazzal.” Also Shabbat 156 ein mazzal le-Yisrael or yesh mazzal le-Yisrael. “Mazzal” here may mean not chance, but natural law

    Meam Loez God created man together with the animals to teach him that as far as his body is concerned, he has no advantages over lower animals. His only advantage is his divine soul

    Malbim (Gen. 1:25) points out that the description of creation in the Torah presents an evolutionary-like sequence of events whereby each day introduces a qualitatively higher level of life form

    Vilna Ga’on comments on Prov. 25:2 that God’s honor demands that we leave hidden what preceded creation and focus only on scientific studies that impact humankind directly. Sa‘adyah Ga’on interprets Eccl. 2:12 as an injunction not to waste time in the study of cosmology, since
    the truth will never be revealed and little will be accomplished despite the expenditure of great effort. We propose, however, that these authorities would have supported the study of the genetic basis of evolution had they been aware of the benefits to humankind—both medical and moral—that
    emerge from the molecular genetics of evolution. Shla Hagigah 11a) that it is legitimate to inquire into and examine the processes by which the world was created during the first six days

    In Eruvin (100b), R. Yohanan states that had the Torah not been given, we would have learned various (good) characteristics from different animals. Animal characteristics are also expressed in
    human beings and should be appropriately studied so that the knowledge gained from such study may be utilized to serve the Creator.

    Humility: The Talmud (Sanhedrin 38a) states: “Our Rabbis taught:
    Adam was created on erev Shabbat [as the last creature created]. Why?
    . . . . So that if man becomes arrogant, one can say to him in reminder: the
    lowly gnat preceded you in the order of creation of the world!” The
    remarkable genetic similarities between human beings and animals—
    the fact that each human being is about 99% genetically similar to the
    monkey—teaches us that human beings have a propensity to behave like
    animals if they are not in possession of morals and values that give them
    true human dignity and enable them to realize their z.
    elem Elokim.45

    in reply to: Are movies ok? #2014774

    maskil > Mitzvos and Aveiros that are in the realm of thoughts and personal feelings, Avoda, etc are not “Hashkafa”. They are “Halacha”.

    I agree. It is just the “halakha” may be complicated in these cases and change based on the person and environment, so it can not be easily summarized `in short lectures for children. And when it is, it does disservice to the topic and to the students.

    in reply to: who started kiruv? #2014778

    akuperman, even later than that. First, there was defense against the foreign influences and antagonists. R Salanter explained going from Lita to Paris: you can’t talk to people who are going down the slope, but you can talk to the ones who already landed at the bottom. I think 1967 war was a big source of teshuva movement in USA, including Chabad activities – turning the view of Judaism from a retreating to a more attractive entity.

    This kuruv period might be over by now: looking at statistics of Jewish community, I see very little movement from non-O to O at this point. Growth of O is via pru urvu and decline in non-O is due to the lack thereof and assimilation …

    in reply to: Please explain Ivermectin #2014731

    As advised, I looked at 4 top papers at FLCCC site ivermectin section:
    1 study: shows 75% improvement use in prophylactics reducing viral load in young people in Dominican Republic. Authors explicitly say that this is a tool in addition to vaccination.
    2nd: study is withdrawn by the referred journal
    3rd: Israeli preprint similar to (1) on a small sample, results claim 3x improvement, but plot over time shows less improvement with a jump up on the last day, others have questions about study design
    4th: a meta-review describing
    – multiple trials, some showing 3x or no improvement in PCR with lower death rates on small samples.
    – comparison of pairs of towns in South America – same idea as Bangladesh study, but without proper design. There is no way to check whether towns are comparable, etc. Claimed results are similar to mask wearing: 2x reduction rates.
    Many of the results above are pre-Delta

    Overall, this conforms to my impression: this is a hopeful tool, especially in poor countries, but even
    most optimistic claimed results say that this is another layer in defense, in now way a substitute for vaccines, masks, etc – and some of the authors say exactly same thing.

    in reply to: Australia #2014707

    aposhiteyid, I understand your point, still 58% agree with “We should not be easing Covid-19 lockdown restrictions until a substantial proportion of children are fully vaccinated”. Do you think that these people are going to sit in lockdowns themselves and welcome others who ignore the rules? I am not there, so it is hard to judge,

    in reply to: Real data: mortality of vaccinated vs non vaxed #2014704

    phil > as well, unfortunately, either from “breakthrough cases” or from side effects.

    the words you are using: “breakthrough” and “side” effects should be your clue that these are not primary effects and lower incidence than the original disease.

    in reply to: will china do our next holocaust #2014702

    5T > Didn’t China save the Mirrer Yeshiva by allowing it to relocate to Shanghai

    Shanghai was occupied by Japanese from 1937 and also had lots of international population – from Western businessmen to Russian refugees from Bolsheviks. Dutch council in Kovno was giving Jews visas to Curaso and Japanese Sugihara used this as a basis to give them transit visas via Japan, that included Shanghai. By some diplomatic miracle (and maybe some financial incentive), Soviets ewre rounding up Jews in Lita and Poland but honored the Jews with these visas to travel freely through, I guess, the same railroad that lead others to labor camps.

    Lack of historical animosity is not a good indicator: Jews had a lot of tensions with Poles – but that is where most of us decided to live over centuries, had our own government (Vaad Arba Artzos), and grew large communities. Many countries did not have tension with Jews by simply not allowing them in or expelling them (Spain, England, Russia).

    in reply to: Is the 27th booster effective? #2014696

    Is there any data how getting healthier (or younger) affects you? Getting rid of weight, reducing blood pressure whether medically or through exercise? I realize CR may not be the best place for such questions, though.

    in reply to: Is the 27th booster effective? #2014695

    Phil, Right,
    disease and vaccines have similar effects on the immune system – they both create antibodies that decrease with time and variants, and they also create B and T cells that do not attack virus immediately upon entering the body but provide some protection against severe disease. There might be differences – which one is waning faster and how much antibodies are created, but differences are smaller than similarities. Protection from B and T-cells are hard to measure, so less is understood about them.

    One difference is that disease may do invisible internal damage and thus a second disease may _sometimes_ be really bad. I know people who sneezed first time and ended up in ICU second time.

    So, bottom line – if 6-8 months passed after your last immune stimulation by either of them, you should at least measure antibodies and possibly get a vaccine – and behave more responsibly.

    Timing is not surprising. Overall, most similar viruses, both disease and vaccines, give protection on the order of a year. People have colds annually … I do have a feeling though how COVID differs from normal colds: neither my wife or me went to big schools or attended tishes. And kids were at home until school. When our oldest kids went to school one year, we evidently encountered “new to us” viruses – and the whole family was sick for several months, a much harder hit than an occasional cold.

    in reply to: who started kiruv? #2014684

    Noah was the first person, but he was not successful. He would talk to them about the bad stuff they were doing, try to explain why bad behavior is damaging: if you are robbing someone today, then tomorrow someone else will rob you, better to have justice and work hard. But he did not explain/show them an alternative of how to live a good life (ad kan Sforno, R Schwab). He would fit well into CR, lambasting people with opposing views.

    in reply to: Please explain Ivermectin #2014674

    > Cavalierly dismisses what is claimed to be a miracle drug

    I am not dismissing anything. I am just looking at less controversial ways to help our communities. Even the most miraculous drugs may stop a person from dying, but the virus already did damage to the body. Obviously, prevention is a key. So, we have certain measures that also became controversial for whatever practical and political reasoning. So, I am suggesting people do CO2 monitoring of their mosdos – easy to do, does not involve medical procedures. Could you help people in your community?

    in reply to: Please explain Ivermectin #2014643

    > I challenge you to explain what they measured

    I read the study, maybe not extremely carefully. Here is my imperfect recollection: the goal was to see group effects, not just individual people. They chose 100s of villages in different parts of the country, divided them in pairs of similar ones, then applied public measures in one set and kept the rest as controls. Most of measures were giving out masks of different types publicly, combined with public messages, and various incentives. Then, they measured number of people who turned up visibly sick, and send observers to measure mask compliance and level of SD. I summarized the results here previously.

    in reply to: Was the 2020 election stolen? #2014584

    coffee > קרקע אינו נגזלת

    I was thinking the same question. Is it karka – White House, or is it movable – Obama’s “a phone and a pen”, and I presume also a red button. Also, I think we presume that non-Jews always steel karka so you let them cut the arovos and they seem to agree now (happy indigenous day!): Brits stole White House karka from Indians, Colonists from Brits, Brits burnt it by halakha of a rebellious city.

    Ctlawyer, what happens on Jan 20 if an election continues being in legal dispute – supreme-court-ordered recount or revote, electors deadlocked, House deadlocked?

    Also, is gezelah a high crime and can a President be impeached for that? probably not of movables

    in reply to: Random funny jokes! #2014568

    ?ווי פילע אַנטי -ציאָניסטן

    in reply to: Real data: mortality of vaccinated vs non vaxed #2014424

    Philosopher, in a year 90% of hospitalized will be vaxxed – because most people will be vaxxed and remaining will get sick one or more times. Over the whole period, 10 times proportionally more non-vaxed will pass away. What exactly are you trying to prove? that it is safer to get sick and die or be immune than to get a vaccine?

    in reply to: Please explain Ivermectin #2014420

    when I check w/ Ivermectin, I did not see any large studies quantifying the effect, so it is hard to judge. Given the low cost, I am surprised why the proponents were not able to organize that.

    I was wondering about nasal sprays myself. This would make sense, provided population can do it. Are there any reliable studies on that?

    Masks – I quoted recently a large high-quality study from Bangladesh about effects of masks in real communities. It is very convincing.

    SD – I am not calling for anyone (outside of my family) to do hasidut. But everyone could do some reasonable steps according to their abilities – limit travel, parties, stay home for a couple of days after visiting hotspots, do not leave kids with grandparents after schools, open windows in schools, etc. I see, unfortunately, a lot of people who would not lift a finger. There is no charitable explanation for that.

    Ventilation, again, would you be interested in testing CO2 levels in mosdos around you? Unlike mouth and hand-washing, this does not require making population do something daily – you can find who has bad ventilation and administration will fix it. Simple, non-intrusive measure.

Viewing 50 posts - 6,651 through 6,700 (of 8,523 total)