DaMoshe

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 1,509 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2278099
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Joe, I don’t believe you. You’ve shown numerous times that you are not trustworthy.

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2277988
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Joe, there’s been no proof that the story isn’t real. I heard the same story years ago, although I forgot from whom.

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2277776
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    During the Six Day War, when it was announced that the IDF had captured the Har Habayis, R’ Yaakov Kaminetsky went into the Beis Medrash of Torah v’Daas, made a Shehechiyanu, and recited Hallel Hagadol.

    in reply to: Superiority #2276043
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Is Joe a bigger troll than anyone else in the CR? I think that’s an obvious yes.
    Is any normal person superior to a big CR troll?
    Is a person who doesn’t obsess over trying to rank people superior to Joe?

    Avira: “a king was chosen BECAUSE of his lofty spiritual accomplishments.” While this may have been true for Shaul and Dovid, I don’t think that was the case for future kings. Future kings were chosen because they descended from Dovid. There were plenty of kings who were horrible people, yet they still held the halachik status of a king.

    in reply to: Mordechai & Esther’s Graves #2274670
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    CTLAWYER: maybe they don’t offer it anymore, but they did when he earned it.
    This argument doesn’t really accomplish anything, so I’m going to stop here.

    in reply to: Mordechai & Esther’s Graves #2274574
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    CTLAWYER: Maybe the degrees changed with time? I don’t know about that, but I do know that on Columbia’s site, it says “Henkin received a B.A. from Yeshiva University, an LL.B. from Harvard University, an L.H.D. from Yeshiva University, and an LL.D. from Columbia University. He also received an honorary J.D. from Brooklyn Law.”

    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Joseph, I don’t think you’ve ever changes someone’s mind, unless it was someone who thought you were an intelligent poster, who changed to realize you’re a troll.

    in reply to: Mordechai & Esther’s Graves #2272030
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    AAQ: The Chofetz Chaim and R’ Soloveichik had sons who had PhDs. R’ Henkin had a son with a doctorate-level degree, but it was in Law, so it was an LL.D. not a PhD.

    in reply to: Trump “wealth” #2271363
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Honestly, at this point, I hope all this stuff leads to him losing support for the nomination. I’d much rather see Haley as the Republican candidate than Trump.

    in reply to: Yom Kippur like Purim #2270968
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Eliezer, is there a reason you constantly bump your own threads?

    in reply to: How did the Marvelous Middos Machine know in advance #2270713
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    I think it was because of the kugelator. That made all the difference. It connected to the grepslink and set off the alarm.

    in reply to: Refuting the Three Oaths [Gimel Shevuot] #2270166
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Avira, you said “The yatzer hora for apikorsus, however, is very strong, and we are told by many tzadikim that it will be an almost insurmountable challenge באחרית הימים.”
    Do you have some sources for this?
    You know, I’ve unfortunately seen many people who are faced with this today, even family members of mine. But it’s not based on Israel, it’s because of other issues. I have a sibling who fell into the trap of modern liberalism, and she told me that she can’t accept a God who says that 2 people loving each other is wrong just because of their gender. I’d say that qualifies as apikorsus, and sadly, there are many today who feel the same way she does.

    in reply to: Refuting the Three Oaths [Gimel Shevuot] #2269851
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Regarding Ezra being a navi: There are opinions that Ezra and Malachi were the same person, and Malachi was definitely a navi.

    in reply to: Refuting the Three Oaths [Gimel Shevuot] #2269832
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Avira, what makes you think that anyone is choosing Bibi over a King established by a Navi? Right now, we don’t have a Navi, and we don’t have a King. We do have a State of Israel, and it has a leader. If a Navi came today and established a King, do you think I’d choose Bibi over him? Absolutely not! I just look at what exists now. In no way does that diminish my longing for Mashiach’s arrival.

    in reply to: Refuting the Three Oaths [Gimel Shevuot] #2269519
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Now Avira knows exactly what *could* have happened in WW2! He knows that if the Jews had gone to Eretz Yisrael, the Nazis would have attacked there!
    He claims Chabad has an issue with a false Navi, but doesn’t see anything wrong with his claiming to know exactly what would have happened had people made other choices…
    Avira, you’re like the story I said in the earlier Chabad thread. You shoot your arrow (anti-Zionist) and then draw the target around it.

    in reply to: Refuting the Three Oaths [Gimel Shevuot] #2269278
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Avira so you think the Ponovezher Rav wasn’t following the Torah when he said that? Or when he flew the Israeli flag in front of the yeshiva, and didn’t say Tachnun on Yom Ha’atzmaut?

    in reply to: Refuting the Three Oaths [Gimel Shevuot] #2269168
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Avira, your claim with the Ponovezher Rav is just plain ridiculous now. You want to claim that he made mistakes, but can’t consider that others might have? So the US State Department said it would take a week – so what? Purim is just over a week away, did you learn nothing from it? Miracles occur that may seem natural.
    To quote a song put out many years ago, “But those who don’t see, are those who refuse to see.”

    in reply to: Refuting the Three Oaths [Gimel Shevuot] #2268950
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Avira, the Ponovezher Rav disagreed with you. After the Six Day War, he wrote an article where he said the war was an open miracle.

    in reply to: Refuting the Three Oaths [Gimel Shevuot] #2268009
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    hakatan, R’ Shlomo Kluger disagreed about the Oaths no longer being binding when the non-Jews didn’t keep to their end. He said it’s pashut that the Oaths relating to the Jews are no longer in effect when the non-Jews treat us harshly.
    Just acknowledge that this is a machlokes, and there are legitimate gedolim on both sides.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2266593
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    sechel, it’s not just my word that R’ Sternbuch said this. He first published a pamphlet about it, about a year after the book was published in Israel (1968), and later wrote about it in his sefer, Teshuvos v’Hanhagos: https://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=20027&pgnum=414&hilite=

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2266434
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Sechel, are you aware that R’ Moshe Sternbuch has said that Kol Hator is a fraud, and was not actually written by the Gra?

    in reply to: R Soloveichik on girls education #2266367
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Joe, Sarah Schenirer wrote in her diaries that she learned Chok l’Yisrael every day. This is a daily seder which includes Chumash, Nach, Mishnah, and Gemara.

    in reply to: R Soloveichik on girls education #2265970
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Avira, now you’re changing your stance. Before, you claimed that it’s 100% assur. Now, you’re claiming that if girls daven, study mussar, etc. they are allowed? You also are claiming that an “exceptional” woman is now exempt from the issur?
    Make up your mind please. If it’s assur, then it’s assur to all women. If it’s not assur, then it’s allowed for all women.
    Which is it?

    in reply to: R Soloveichik on girls education #2265836
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    As I said in another thread, Sarah Schenirer learned Gemara. Please explain that.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2265351
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    I have to agree with the Mod and stand up for Satmar here. I think everyone here knows I have LOTS of issues with Satmar, but I can’t fault them for their chessed. They don’t limit it to just their own chassidus, they help everyone. Anyone who’s been in an NYC hospital, especially over Shabbos, and needed food, probably benefitted from Satmar. I know many people that they’ve helped financially as well. So please, don’t claim that Satmar only looks out for their own. It’s simply not true.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2264535
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Avira, you’re wrong yet again. Teaching women Gemara has nothing to do with science. As I wrote earlier in the thread, there are opinions from major rabbonim (such as R’ Henkin) that it’s permissible to teach Gemara to women as long as it’s by choice, and not mandated. So it can be an elective class, not a required class. I posted a link to an article from R’ Jachter which goes through all the sources.

    As for RABBI Lamm’s thoughts, if only we’d all be on the level where we looked at everything we learned from a Torah perspective, then yes, we probably should recite Birchas haTorah. For example, when the Gra wrote his sefer explaining trigonometry, even though it’s math, it was used to properly understand Maseches Sukkah. Studying trig in order to understand the Gemara is learning Torah.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2264496
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Avirah, you’re back to your old self, insulting Modern Orthodoxy whenever you can, for no reason whatsoever. You’re completely wrong, BTW – Modern Orthodox Jews don’t equate learning Torah with science. Please put aside your hatred, and actually educate yourself.

    in reply to: Sharing my Torah thoughts #2264045
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Wow, it’s been a long time since I wrote down any of my thoughts here…

    This is from a few weeks ago, but also relates to this time of year.

    The question is asked, why is Parshas Mishpatim where it is? After hearing about all the incredible wonders that Bnei Yisrael experienced, all of a sudden, we go to just a series of laws, which seem to be somewhat mundane? We go from excitement to just dry reading of the laws?
    One answer given is that we may think that the miracles are what show the greatness of Hashem. The Torah is showing us that the laws show the greatness equally as much as the miracles.
    I had my own thought as to why the laws are written here. Chumash Shemos is about the founding of the Jewish nation. We went from being a family (descended from the Avos) to being a full-fledged nation, bound to Hashem at Har Sinai. To someone who was there at the time, or someone learning this for the first time, they may think, “What is being a Jew about? It’s about experiencing gilui Shechina, seeing these amazing wonders!” Hashem is telling us no, that’s not what it’s about. When we were formed as a nation, with yetzias Mitzrayim, Krias Yam Suf, and Matan Torah, yes, there were miracles. The nation experienced a gilui Shechina which was never replicated after, and won’t be until the coming of Mashiach. But going forward, we needed to know, that is not what being a Jew is about! In our day to day lives, it’s about the mundane, it’s about following the laws that govern our every action.
    Perhaps that is why in Parshas Yisro, when it gives the response of the Jews, it only says the word Naaseh – Nishma is missing. Nishma is only mentioned at the end of Mishpatim, after the laws are given over. We can only have the full acceptance when we understand what it is that we’re accepting.

    There are opinions that the Kabalas haTorah at Har Sinai was not fully sincere – one opinion even says that the Jews were trying to “trick” Hashem. We know that there was a second Kabalas haTorah, on Purim – kimu v’kiblu. What is the connection between Purim and Kabalas haTorah? Why was that the day that this occurred?

    I thought that perhaps the connection to Parshas Mishpatim is the answer. The Jews experienced all the wonders, and were obviously so inspired by them. But when the wonders were gone, their acceptance slipped. “Where is the Shechina now?” they may have wondered. They didn’t see it openly before them anymore, and perhaps it affected them.

    On Purim, they saw the nes nistar. They realized that even when they can’t see Hashem openly, He is still there behind the scenes, looking out for us. When they realized that, they knew that even without the gilui Shechinah, Hashem is with us. That inspired them to fully accept the Torah, knowing that we are never alone.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2263907
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Sechel, the number of people who can quote the teachings of someone doesn’t indicate greatness. Far more people can quote teachings of Jesus – does that indicate greatness?

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2263351
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    “if the rebbe wasn’t a gadal, who was?“

    Someone who didn’t declare themselves to be Mashiach.

    in reply to: Who gains by flooding the US with millions of Illegals?? #2263195
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    CTL, I’m curious what your legal opinion is regarding DACA.
    In my opinion, it was blatantly unconstitutional. Obama passed it via Executive Order, even though it violates current US law. The president is charged to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed”, and DACA goes against that.

    So I ask, as a lawyer, what is your opinion on DACA?

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2262730
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Avira, incorrect. It would seem that according to many, making Gemara a required course for women would be forbidden, but making it an elective, that women could choose on their own to take, would be allowed. That is how some schools have it. I don’t know of any Jewish girls schools that require their students to attend a class on Gemara.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2262543
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Avira, as for proof about Sara Schenirer learning Gemara, it’s something I’ve read on numerous bios of her. In her diaries, she wrote that she learned the daily Chok l’Yisrael seder. Chok l’Yisrael contains Chumash, Navi, Mishnayos, and Gemara. I found it interesting that in some of the more yeshivish bios where I read this, they removed Gemara when explaining what Chok l’Yisrael is.
    In R’ Jachter’s article (which I linked to above – thanks Mods!), he notes that the prohibition, according to many, is to force women to learn Mishna or Gemara. If they choose to learn it on their own, there is no problem. See the Torah Temimah on Devarim 11:19. Also, R’ Chaim Dovid haLevi quotes the Chida as having this view, and R’ Henkin said that this views explains how there were so many women who were very learned, from Bruriah all the way to modern times – he names the wife of R’ Isser Zalman Meltzer.
    There is disagreement on the issue, so each should follow their own posek.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2262492
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Avira, there is an excellent article by R’ Jachter which goes through the different opinions on whether women can learn Gemara. Not sure the mods will allow the link: https://www.koltorah .org/halachah/are-women-permitted-to-study-gemara-by-rabbi-howard-jachter?format=amp
    In the event they don’t, just search for Jachter can women learn Gemara.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2262399
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    It should be noted that Sarah Schenirer learned Gemara every day, as part of a daily seder she had.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2261939
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Sechel, R’ Shach did not consider the Lubavitcher Rebbe to be a Gadol. He actually referred to him as “the madman who sits in New York and drives the whole world crazy”.
    He said that the statements he made regarding his father in law being God clothed in a human body, just like Moshe, as kefirah, and said that Chabad followers were just like the followers of Shabtai Tzvi. When the Lubavitcher Rebbe was sick, R’ Shach said that he davened for him to recover, and also to do teshuvah for the path he followed.
    He already accused the Rebbe of being a Mashiach sheker in the 1970s.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2261552
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    So Avira, you’re saying that the Chabad chassidim who spend the vast majority of their learning time on chassidus are going against what the Baal haTanya wanted?

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2261528
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    R’ Chaim Volozhin wrote the following in Nefesh Hachaim (Beginning of Shaar Daled):
    וגם כמה מאותן אשר קרבת אלהים יחפצון. המה בחרו לעצמם לקבוע כל עיקר לימודם בספרי יראה ומוסר כל הימים. בלא קביעות עיקר העסק בתוה”ק במקראות והלכות מרובות. ועדן לא ראו מאורות מימיהם ולא נגה עליהם אור התורה. ה’ יסלח להם. כי כוונתם לשמי’. אבל לא זו הדרך ישכון בם אור התורה:

    He then goes into the fact that mussar is important, and was introduced because there was a need for it, but that it was secondary to learning Gemara, Rashi, and Tosfos. He continues:
    והן עתה בדורות הללו בעוה”ר נהפוך הוא. הגבוה השפל. שכמה וכמה שמו כל עיקר קביעת לימודם רוב הימים רק בספרי יראה ומוסר. באמרם כי זה כל האדם בעולמו לעסוק בהם תמיד. כי המה מלהיבים הלבבות אשר אז יכנע לבבו להכניע ולשבר היצר מתאוותיו. ולהתיישר במדות טובות. וכתר תורה מונח בקרן זוית. ובעיני ראיתי בפלך א’ שכ”כ התפשט אצלם זאת. עד שברוב בתי מדרשם אין בהם רק ספרי מוסר לרוב. ואפי’ ש”ס א’ שלם אין בו. וטח עיניהם מראות מהבין והשכיל לבותם. אשר לא זו הדרך בחר בו ה’ כי לא ירצה. ועוד מעט בהמשך הזמן יוכלו להיות ח”ו ללא כהן מורה. ותורה מה תהא עליה:

    So as I said, in the early days of chassidus, the primacy of learning Torah was set aside in favor of learning “chassidus”. R’ Chaim Volozhin bemoaned this fact.
    In most sects of chassidus, this changed, and they now focus on Gemara. Chabad still holds closest to the original teachings of the Besht and his students, and focus on chassidus, instead of Gemara, Rashi, and Tosfos.

    As for Sechel’s claim that the Gra would prefer that people learn Tanya instead of being in the CR, I firmly disagree. I think that if the Gra were here now, he’d be appalled by what he saw in Chabad, and it would just affirm everything he feared about chassidus creating another Shabtai Tzvi. He probably would think we’re all doing wrong, whether we’re here in the CR, or learning Tanya.

    If he were here, he’d make his way to a yeshiva, would likely marvel at how many seforim are available now, and lament the fact that with so much Torah readily available, people still waste their times with other things.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2260522
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Froggie (and others):
    Chassidus as originally intended by the Besht was problematic. Yes, he did introduce new ideas into Judaism. He claimed that learning Torah was not of utmost importance, and instead shifted the focus to tefillah, along with happiness. His followers did things such as turn cartwheels while davening, spoke in tongues, and other strange actions. There are other teachings which were concerning, and I won’t get into all of them. They can be summed up by his asserting the primacy of Kabbalah over traditional thought, even when it came to Halachah. Kabbalah is not supposed to be learned while young, and definitely not before one has a solid foundation in the traditional sources of Tanach, Mishnayos, and Gemara.
    Chassidus ended up becoming accepted because a few generations later, the leaders walked back on some of the ideas, and accepted the traditional views, merging some chassidic thoughts into them. Most of the things that were problematic were abandoned (although not all).
    So Chassidus as the Besht envisioned it is long gone. Yet as I said, some problematic parts do remain.
    But let’s be clear about this: The Besht did NOT have a mesorah for his teachings. He didn’t learn about the supremacy of tefillah over learning Torah from his father (he was orphaned at the age of 5) or his Rebbe.
    There are no seforim on learning from the Besht. Only quotes from his students, and mostly on matters of Chassidus. So there is absolutely zero proof that he was knowledgeable in Shas. In fact, the people who supported him had hoped he’d become a Rabbi, but he frequently skipped cheder to walk in the woods, and they gave up on him. When he finished cheder (at the age of 12), they gave him a job walking escorting the small children to cheder in the morning, and davening with them.
    My personal belief is that the stories of the Besht were inflated by those who came after, such as the Maggid of Mezritch, Yaakov Yosef of Polonye, and others.

    Since chassidus today was tempered by the traditional Jewish population, and they abandoned most of the teachings, chassidus became more accepted. But if the many of the practices were problematic, why do we think that those which remained are ok? If the source had problems, wouldn’t it be better to cut off all those teachings?

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2260621
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Froggie, I don’t want you to think I’m ignoring your response to me. I wrote a reply, but apparently it wasn’t approved.

    Sorry, still working on it…

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2260442
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Coffee, the Besht claimed that he ascended to the Heavens, and Achiya Hashiloni taught him this derech.
    Later, he claimed to have met Mashiach, and was told that he’d only arrive when the world followed the teachings of Chassidus.
    This in my understanding is no different than a Christian claiming to have had a dream telling him to spread the words of Jesus.

    Sorry, but edited

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2260391
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Coffee, yes, there are different paths, but each path needs a mesorah. Chassidus has no mesorah – the Besht did not have a teacher who taught him that path.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2260339
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    coffee addict, your post is one of the main reasons why I’m opposed to chassidus as a whole. Chassidus started because someone claimed to receive a vision in a dream, telling him to teach a new form of Judaism.

    in reply to: infertility issues/the blessing of children #2259836
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    I saw the history appears to be working again, hopefully permanently this time! I clicked to the end of my posts to see if it went all the way back, and I found this thread, which I posted in over 12 years ago. I think this is the oldest thread I’ve ever bumped!

    I just wanted to share something that occurred just a few weeks ago. My twins are now teenagers, and B”H are doing nicely. My wife and I did try to have more children, but sadly, the treatments didn’t work, and we decided that if we were to have more children, it would come straight from Hashem, without any more running to doctors.
    So a few weeks ago, on a Shabbos, after the meal, my daughter made a comment to me. She said, “I really wish I had more siblings, especially some younger ones. Why couldn’t you and Mommy have more kids?”
    I answered her, “You know that you and your brother are miracles, that the doctors thought wouldn’t happen. Hashem gave us the two of you, and I guess He felt that was all we should have. IY”H when you are married, I hope that you’ll be able to have as many children as you want, without any issues at all!”

    That was the end of the conversation. But you know what? Even all these years later, it hurt tremendously. I was fighting back tears after she made her comment. I know it’s not my fault at all, and I’m grateful for what I have, but when my own child, who is a miracle herself, complains about it, it just opens up old wounds.

    I can’t imagine the pain of those who were never able to have their own children. If it hurts this much when I have my own kids, how much more do they feel?

    Over the years, I’ve urged many people to support Bonei Olam. If you haven’t signed up for their V’Zakeini program, please do so – $1 per week can go a long way! They just sent out a success story a few weeks ago, how a couple, after 24 years of marriage, finally had a baby boy, through this program. They have other fundraisers throughout the year as well.

    Let’s make sure that EVERY Jewish couple can hold their own child in their arms. Let’s end the pain that so many couples are feeling.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2259620
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    qwerty, here is what R’ Belsky zt”l said about Chabad:
    “Chabad used to be about disseminating Chassidic teachings which the Baal HaTanya wrote, saying his Divrei Torah, etc. In America, Chabad started out with Shlichim going out and bringing the masses back to Judaism. These are goals which we share and do not contest.

    But present-day Chabad has nothing to do with the above. Present-day Chabad has become a personal cult centered on the previous Lubavitcher Rebbe. Everything they do from beginning to end, revolves around this. They constantly project his image, talk about him and how great he was, how smart he was, how he was a better strategist than all the generals, that he was Mashiach. etc. This is the way people talk about a cult figure. There’s no room in Yiddeshkeit for a personality cult in which an individual is deified and glorified. Whether he was great or wasn’t great is immaterial. There have been many great people in Judaism. The personality cult of glorifying an individual person, giving him unique titles, elevating the shape other building he was active in. etc., has no place in Yiddishkeit.”

    in reply to: Bli Neder no music until all hostages are free #2259510
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    At the Darchei Torah dinner a few weeks ago, R’ Bender said that there’s a boy in Darchei who is doing the same thing – only lukewarm showers. There are others who have taken on other things. I believe there’s a boy who is sleeping without pillows.
    I’ve had dessert a couple of times, for a specific reason. We had Shabbos guests who brought dessert, and purposely brought something they know I enjoy. I didn’t want them to feel bad, so I had a small piece. I spoke to a Rav after, and he agreed that it was the right thing to do.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2259509
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    CS: Saying an individual is god clothed in human form is absolute kefirah. If you say no Lubavitcher would see it that way, and they all believe it’s true, then you’re saying that all Lubavitchers are kofrim.
    Thank you for clarifying that for me. I was hesitant at times to daven in a Chabad House, even when traveling to a place where there are no shuls. Now I know that I was correct, and I will daven b’yichidus rather than go to a Chabad House.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2259203
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    CS: I’d use your medical analogy, but turn it against you. If a 3 year old would read a medical text cover to cover, would you trust what the kid says regarding medicine? No, because they can’t hope to understand it.
    Learning chassidus/kabalah as the primary type of Torah is like a 3 year old reading a medical text. You can’t hope to understand it, because the foundations are in Chumash, Mishnayos, and Gemara. You may think you’re an expert, but you’re not, because you’re missing the foundations. You just twist the words to suit your goals – just like the story I wrote earlier, painting the targets around the arrows.

    in reply to: Why did most Litvish stop wearing Shtreimals? #2258827
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    Gadolhadorah, do you realize that to go from Lakewood to Monsey, you’d pass through Bergen County? You’ll probably see many more srugies than streimlach there!

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258747
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    CS, it was reported by a Yaakov Zisholtz. I have no idea who he is. If I Google him, I don’t find much. So no, I wouldn’t trust it.
    If you take one prediction the Rebbe made that came true, and use that as a sign that he was a Navi… there are plenty of people who made predictions that came true, including Shabsai Tzvi.
    When my wife and I were going through fertility treatments, we were having a lot of difficulty, and our doctor told us to give up. We got a bracha from a Rav that our next IVF should work, and B”H it did. Does that mean he was a Navi?
    There were sports players who predicted that they’d win a game, and they did. Maybe they’re nevi’im too?

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 1,509 total)