LerntminTayrah

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 211 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2278978
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    YWN CR is littered with threads about Zionism. Leave the Zionism bashing there. This thread is focused on the miracles that have taken place, as recognized by such gedolim as Rav Moshe Feinstein zt”l, the Brisker Rav zt”l, Rav Chaim Shmulevitz zt”l, and other. And on the modern miracles when compared to other baselines. The Brisker Rav zt”l hated Zionists but he knew a miracle when he saw one.

    Smerel raises a very good point. I have quoted previously the exact part of the Vayoel Moshe where he clearly says that the whole kiyum is Israel is a maaseh satan, not just “teva”. We all know Satmar Yidden. Ask them what is meant by Maaseh Satan, so you can get the actual Satmar mesorah of what the Satmar Rebbe zt”l really held. You can thus confirm that Rav Lorincz did not distort the street view of Maaseh Satan when he asked the Brisker Rav zt”l about it. I’ll quote this again from the Satmar Rebbe zt”l since people somehow seem to keep missing this:

    והנשארים מבני ישראל שהשאיר הקב”ה בעבור שבועתו שלא יכלה זרעו, נענשו גם כן בעונש קשה ומר, במה שצליח מעשה שטן להשיג מלכות המינות לנסות את ישראל בניסיון עצום כזה … וזה ברור כי אותו הרעיון המתועב הוא המעכב גאולתינו ופדות נפשינו.

    Like chazal say,אם תלכו עמי קרי means saying everything is mikreh and teva, even when it’s clear that it isn’t. When Hashem lets the hastara slip and shows us His hashgacha, it’s worth it to recognize it. As the Brisker Rav zt”l made clear, one can be vehemently against Zionism and still see nissim and hashgacha with Eretz Yisroel.
    Gradde, I have previously quoted the amazing nissim that occurred to the Mir in 1967. Rav Shmulevitz zt”l used to have a seudas hodaah after that to thank Hashem for the nissim- and the kanoim would be outside his door protesting!

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2278859
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    mdd1, I have shared an article from the day after the attack from Understanding War explaining it. I have shared a piece from an Israeli expert explaining how 90% accuracy (leting through 1 out of 10 missiles) is much easier than 99% accuracy (letting through 1 out of 100 missiles), and 99.9% accuracy (letting through 1 out of a thousand) is that much harder. I have shared the quote from the Biden official who said that the success could not likely be replicated, indicating it was statistically anomalous , ie a neis. Not sure why the Rand article is the one you keep repeating, but that article explains the dfficulties in achieving the coverage. So yes it’s a neis.
    Most systems do have a 20 year development lead time, and many older systems are still in use. The US still flies F-15’s even though those are from the 70’s. So yes an exloration of the system from 2001 is still relevant today. And we see from ukraine how tough it is.

    Your attempt to explain Fallujah vs Gaza was not cogent. The fact remains that the US, the most well-equipped army in the world, had a death toll 10 times worse than Israel had. That established the baseline. Israel having 90% fewer losses is definitely a neis.
    Here is another write-up from the same professor explaining the difference between letting 1 out of 10 missiles through and 1 out of 100, which every bar seichel should understand is much harder and much less likely to be achieved:
    Professor of physics, Maximilian Abitbol, who is also an expert on the defense industry had this to say about the events of Saturday night.
    _______________________________________________________________
    Scientific Proof that what happened on the 6th of Nissan was nothing short of a Miracle* Words written by a Physics Professor who worked in Israel’s Defense Industry

    I wanted to share something that is much more than a feeling. Something that comes from a real calculation: What happened in Israel on last Motzaei Shabbat was not less than the scale of the splitting of the Red Sea.

    I am a Professor of physics and I worked for several years in the defense industry in Israel, in projects that are still the cutting edge technologies of the defence of the State of Israel. When I look at what happened on Motzai Shabbat, on a scientific level – it simply cannot happen!! Statistically.

    The likelihood that everything, but really Everything works out, does not exist in complex systems like the defense systems that were used to defend Israel from the massive Iranian attack.

    These systems have never, but never, not only in the State of Israel, been tried in real time!!

    I took a pencil and dived into the calculations to check the statistic probability that such a result would materialize. The large number of events that had to be handled, when each missile or UAV is handled independently (that is, human error or some deviation of one operation, is not offset by other successful operations), compounds the chance of making a mistake.

    With all the high technologies, a breach was expected in the defense of the skies of the State of Israel.

    Even if we got 90% protection it would have been a miracle!!

    What happened is that everyone, but everyone – the pilots, the systems operators and the technology operators acted as one man, at one moment in total unity. If this is not an act of G-d, then I no longer know what a miracle is.

    It is Greater than the victory of the Six Day War or the War of Independence. Those wars can also be explained through natural events.
    BUT
    The rescue that took place for the people of Israel on Motzai Shabbat is simply impossible naturally. I believe that this miracle saved the lives of many people from Israel.

    If the defense system had failed to intercept a number of cruise missiles, the result would have dragged us into a very complex war. I wouldn’t bet that next time it will work like this without Divine supervision. The simple proof of what I said is that the managers of the defense industries, who develop and manufacture these systems guarantee no more than 90% success!And we all saw, with our own eyes 99.9% !!!

    Thank You Hashem!!

    “From the day you came out of the land of Egypt I Have Showed you Wonders”,

    M. Abitbol

    _____________________________

    agav, I am still bewildered by how anyone can deny the nissim of 1967. the Mir was hit by multiple shells and NONE of them exploded:
    More Tehillim. A bris in the morning in the [Chevron] yeshivah. At 12:15, I felt it safe to go to the Mir. They were real happy to see me. It was still dangerous but not very noisy. Rav Chaim [Shmuelevitz] gave me shalom and asked how I was. They told me of the nissim that happened. Two direct hits were on the building — one right through the rosh yeshivah zatzal apartment and one in the corner of the Beis Medrash. The roof was also hit direct and a piece is missing. Shells were falling all around and some said vidui. At 2:00 they said Tehillim for 1 1⁄2 hours. In the afternoon they announced on Kol Yisrael about no injuries — neiss chasdei Mir and the hits.

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2278305
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    Mdd1, every system takes 20 years to develop. The article is still relevant on the theory. The “Understanding war” post i posted is from Sunday, and is very relevant. Ditto the quote from an unnamed Biden staffer who said that Shabbos’s success is unlikely to be replicated. I am still waiting for a cogent explanation on how the US, against the same Arabs in an urban war zone, got a death rate 10x higher than Israel if not for a neis. Conventional wars are not nissim, though they are Yad Hashem. It’s when you see something very much unexpected that you are supposed to stop and think about it, and praise Hashem. And we have that here.
    In fact, conventional wars show us what is expected and unexpected. Fallujah showed us conventional teva in urban warfare. the Russia vs Ukraine showed us teva in blocking ballistic missiles.
    Even Iron Dome, which is against slower, more easily tracked targets, only has a success rate of 90%. 99% vs ballistic missiles which are much harder to track and hit?

    Iron Dome
    This system, developed by Israel with U.S. backing, specializes in shooting down short-range rockets. It has intercepted thousands of rockets since it was activated early last decade – including thousands of interceptions during the current war against Hamas and Hezbollah. Israel says it has a success rate of over 90%.

    Reb Moshe Feinstein zt”l wrote that 1967 was an example of nissim in our time. The Brisker Rav zt”l said that 1948 was a neis. And he should know- he lived through the bombardment. So yes, miracles in Eretz Yisroel are miracles according to litvish mesorah.

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2278129
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    Pleaase see my previous post where I have quoted the exact part of the Vayoel Moshe that backs up Rav Lorincz.

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2278120
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    I would like to deal with this question from mdd: “And what happened with the nissin on October 7?”
    It’s a very good question. But it’s not a question on me. It’s a question on the entire Chumash and Tanach, which have tragedies and miracles interspersed. And those tragedies can’t be blamed on Zionism. Feel free to pick your favorite peirush and see what they say on it. Rav Avigdor Miller zt”l has written on this extensively.

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2278103
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    we’re not doing a repeat of this from your other thread. You said it once now done. You have points to make, go ahead, but we aren’t destroying individual posters.

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2278027
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    I would like to share this quote from an Axios story about the Iranian missile attack:
    “We think it will be very hard to replicate the huge success we had on Saturday with defeating the attack if Iran launches hundreds of missiles and drones again — and the Israelis know it,” another U.S. official said.

    In other words, it is NOT teva to be that successful. 90% coverage is orders of magnitude harder than 75% coverage, 99% coverage is orders of magnitude harder than 90% coverage. The unnamed US official is saying “lav bechol yoma israchish nisa”.

    The attack was incredibly large. It was designed with slower uav’s up front to exhaust the defenses, followed by cruise and ballistic missiles after that to get through the gaps . It was a well-thought-out strategy that should have worked. It is nissim that it didn’t.

    A paper called “A New Methodology for Assessing Multilayer Missile Defense Options”, published by Rand Corporation, is easily accessible via Google. It talks about how difficult it is to achieve even a 90% coverage rate for missile attacks.

    In short, a huge miracle that we would be fools to ignore. Such is the zechus of Torah.

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2277957
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    I also felt it’s prudent to point out that the rebuttal of the Gaza death toll being 10 times less than the Fallujah death was ” Arabs can’t fight so of course the tziyoinistim were going to have it easy”. This falls apart when you realize that Fallujah is settled by those very same Arabs. Yet the death toll was ten times higher. The only difference between Fallujah and Gaza is Yidden, in which case you are forced to acknowledge it as a miracle.

    “I know nothing about ballistic missiles” is also not a refutation of the miracle that took place.

    Nu, some were meant to not be zoiche to see miracles, it is what Hashem decreed. This has nothing to do with Zionism. It has to do with miracles.

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2277953
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    HaKatan, nothing you said changes the facts: There were open nissim here. We need to recognize them and be makir tov. Scoring points against Zionism is irrelevant here. Hashem did a great miracle on Shabbos by making the interception rate much higher than it should have been. That’s the bottom line. Hodu LaShem Ki Tov.

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2277952
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    mdd1, Iron Dome is a kiddie toy. It goes against slow-moving rockets. It is very successful but is a neis nistar like most technology.

    Ballistic missiles are entirely different. Many experts thought that shooting down ballistic missiles in real time was an exercise in futility. To knock down every ballistic missile in a target-rich environment and an overwhelming attack is not derech hateva. But don’t believe me. Do your own research on ballistic missile interceptions and feel free to show me which experts thought it’s easy. Trite sayings don’t compare to facts, and the facts say this is a huge miracle not “teva”.

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2277898
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    Iron Dome is NOT Arrow. Iron Dome is for slower missiles. Ballistic missiles are an entirely different ball of wax. They move much faster and are much harder to accurately detect, let alone hit. Many thought the system would never work as it’s trying to hit a bullet with a bullet. Shabbos was the first test, and it was a test. A 90% success rate is MUCH easier statistically than a 95% success rate, and that is much easier statistically than a 99% success rate, and that is much easier statistically than a 100% success rate. It’s the same way that getting a 90% on a test is much easier than getting a 99%.
    Nu, iveir bechoichesh yehalech. I did mine. Hodu LaShem ki tov.

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2277777
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    Here is a repost from “Understanding War”, a defense analysis site. You can google this paragraph to confirm it’s unaltered from the original source and it’s a real website not something made up:
    _________________________________________________________________________
    The strike consisted of approximately 170 drones, 30 cruise missiles, and 120 ballistic missiles.[1] The drones were launched well before the ballistic missiles were fired, very likely in the expectation that they would arrive in Israel’s air defense window at about the same time as the cruise missiles and drones. The Russians have used such an approach against Ukraine repeatedly.[2] The purpose of such a package is to have the slower cruise missiles and drones distract and overwhelm air defenses in order to allow the ballistic missiles, which are much harder to shoot down, to reach their targets. The Iranians very likely expected that few if any of the cruise missiles and drones would hit their targets, but likely hoped that a significantly higher percentage of the ballistic missiles would do so.

    Only a few ballistic missiles penetrated Israeli air defenses and struck near Israeli military bases out of the 120 or so the Iranians fired.[3] Ukrainian air defenses have averaged interception rates of only about 16% of Russian ballistic missiles during recent large strikes. The Iranians likely expected that Israeli rates would be higher than the Ukrainian rates but not above 90% against such a large ballistic missile salvo—the Russians, after all, have never fired close to that many large ballistic missiles in a single strike against Ukraine. Ukraine frequently intercepts more than 75% of Russian cruise missiles and drones, but many of those interceptions occur within the air defense umbrella that is also occupied with ballistic missile defense. The Iranians thus likely expected that at least some of their drones and cruise missiles would interfere with Israeli targeting of incoming ballistic missiles, whereas apparently none did.
    __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    In short, a 100% interception rate is NOT bederech hateva in any way shape or form. Feel free to be a Brisker and hate the Zionists and everything they stand for. Just when Hashem performs obvious miracles, don’t deny them.
    Obviously even teva is a miracle, just we are used to it. This one was out of the range of teva, and it behooves us to acknowledge it instead of denying it. This is not a proof to Zionism in any way shape or form, just like the miracles of 1948 and 1967 weren’t proofs to Zionism. They are miracles done for the frum people of Eretz Yisroel, not the apikorsim. But they are miracles nonetheless. Hodu Lashem ki tov!

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2277772
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    I got this in a forward. Didn’t confirm if the author is real, but as this was the first time ballistic missile interceptions were performed, an act viewed as “hitting a bullet with a bullet”, the statistics he cites are real. Yes, what happened Shabbos was not a conventional military victory but a miracle. If you don’t understand, feel free to research ballistic missile interceptions so you can understand he miracle:
    _________________________________________________________________________________________________________
    Words written by a Physics Professor who worked in Israel’s Defense Industry

    I wanted to share something that is much more than a feeling. Something that comes from a real calculation: What happened in Israel on last Motzaei Shabbat was not less than the scale of the splitting of the Red Sea.

    I am a Professor of physics and I worked for several years in the defense industry in Israel, in projects that are still the cutting edge technologies of the defence of the State of Israel. When I look at what happened on Motzai Shabbat, on a scientific level – it simply cannot happen!! Statistically.

    The likelihood that everything, but really Everything works out, does not exist in complex systems like the defense systems that were used to defend Israel from the massive Iranian attack.

    These systems have never, but never, not only in the State of Israel, been tried in real time!!

    I took a pencil and dived into the calculations to check the statistic probability that such a result would materialize. The large number of events that had to be handled, when each missile or UAV is handled independently (that is, human error or some deviation of one operation, is not offset by other successful operations), compounds the chance of making a mistake.

    With all the high technologies, a breach was expected in the defense of the skies of the State of Israel.

    Even if we got 90% protection it would have been a miracle!!

    What happened is that everyone, but everyone – the pilots, the systems operators and the technology operators acted as one man, at one moment in total unity. If this is not an act of G-d, then I no longer know what a miracle is.

    It is Greater than the victory of the Six Day War or the War of Independence. Those wars can also be explained through natural events.
    BUT
    The rescue that took place for the people of Israel on Motzai Shabbat is simply impossible naturally. I believe that this miracle saved the lives of many people from Israel.

    If the defense system had failed to intercept a number of cruise missiles, the result would have dragged us into a very complex war. I wouldn’t bet that next time it will work like this without Divine supervision. The simple proof of what I said is that the managers of the defense industries, who develop and manufacture these systems guarantee no more than 90% success!And we all saw, with our own eyes 99.9% !!!

    Thank You Hashem!!

    “From the day you came out of the land of Egypt I Have Showed you Wonders”,

    M. Abitbol
    _______________________________________________________________________________________

    Please stop hijacking this thread with the usual “Empty Wagon” sound bites. The Brisker Rav zt”l, while hating the Zionists, did NOT avert his eyes from obvious miracles. He just said it wasn’t for the zionists. This is my central point: that there were obvious open miracles. Real Satmars can see them, just it’s maaseh Satan. (As well, real Satmars balance their anti-zionism with chessed and caring for other yidden. They also don’t hang out on ywn because Yiddish is their first language. ) The only ones who can’t see the miracles are the “Empty Wagon” fanboys, and I feel bad for you. You are missing out on a connection to Hashem that the Briskers have, even as they hate Zionists with the same passion as you.

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2277591
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    As well, a 2009 article on Cross Currents has Rav Yaakov zt”l saying a bracha after the 6 day war. It also describes how everyone thought Israel was a goner, not like some here have claimed.
    Swiped from elsewhere:
    _______________________________________________________
    The following comes from HaGaon HaRav Yaakov Kamenetsky’s sefer Emet L’Yaakov.

    The Ramban writes that the Chashmonaim – who were kohanim – violated the Biblical rule of “lo yasur shevet mi’Yehudah” by serving as rulers over the Jewish people. Rav Kamenetsky asks an obvious question: How were the Chashmonaim ever enthroned as kings? Didn’t Chazal publicly object?

    Rav Kamenetsky suggests that Chazal actually approved of their appointment as kings. Klal Yisrael was so assimilated and their spirits were so low that Chazal felt it necessary to lift their morale by granting them a temporary malchut of Jewish kings. And since this malchut was only designed to be a temporary measure, they specifically did not want descendants of Shevet Yehudah (so as to signify its temporary nature).

    Many aspects of the Jewish kingdom at the time were “temporary” or non-ideal in nature. For example, the basic language used was Aramaic, a galut language, and the Aron HaKodesh was not in the Kodesh Kodashim. So non-ideal was the Jews’ situation in Judea that the berachah in the Amidah for the return to Jerusalem was enacted in this era – even though Jews resided in Jerusalem at the time.

    By enthroning kohanim as kings over Israel, Chazal wished to emphasize that their era – after the miracle of Chanukah – was not the Ge’ula Shleima as was thought by many at the time.

    Rav Kamenetsky argued that the emergence of the state of Israel resembles the enthronement of the Chashmonaim as kings. As a result of the Holocaust, the Jewish people were depressed and saddened. They needed something to uplift their spirits as well as make them feel that Hashem had not forsaken them. Medinat Yisrael was a gesture to transform and uplift Jewish morale.

    It is not the Ge’ula Shleima. It is not the z’man of Moshiach. But it is similar to the enthronement of the Chasmonaim to build Jewish pride and morale.
    _____________________
    Not exactly a Zionist, but not Maaseh Satan.

    It is a strange alliance of secular Zionists and Satmar followers denying the obvious Yad Hashem and claiming it is due to the might of Israel that this miraculous death toll in Gaza and during the Iranian attack happened.

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2277590
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    Rav Shmuel Kamentsky Shlita is the one that allowed voting for WZO, he clearly doesn’t believe his father zt”l held it was maaseh satan.

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2277559
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    I wasn’t at the Agudah meeting in question, can’t answer for what happened. But dismissing something because you don’t like what is says is a take.
    These words of the Satmar Rebbe zt”l confirm the traditional understanding of maaseh satan:
    והנשארים מבני ישראל שהשאיר הקב”ה בעבור שבועתו שלא יכלה זרעו, נענשו גם כן בעונש קשה ומר, במה שצליח מעשה שטן להשיג מלכות המינות לנסות את ישראל בניסיון עצום כזה … וזה ברור כי אותו הרעיון המתועב הוא המעכב גאולתינו ופדות נפשינו.

    The Brisker Rav zt”l said chas veshalom to say such a thing, but said th miracles were for the sake of the pure people learning not for the apikorsim who made up much of the zionists.

    Itche Meir Levin might be an askan, but he summed up how many felt. Rav Moshe Feinstein zt”l wrote in the darash moshe that 1967 was a miracle. The Brisker Rav zt”l said 1948 was a miracle. Unlike the Satmar Rebbe zt”l, he lived in Eretz Yisroel and would know that better than people living in chutz la’aretz who only know what’s going on based on what they are told by gabboim.

    As for the modern open miracles, a death rate 90% less than what was expected is not teva. Neither is a large missile attack doing no damage. One missile backfired and landed in Shiraz, and did a huge amount of damage. We also saw in Ukraine how much damage the drones do. I feel bad that Hashem is showing us open miracles but you are unable to see them.

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2277465
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    This is what I found on a blog from 1967, indicating that When the Satmar Rebbe zt”l said Maaseh Satan he meant it as I have it here:
    _________________________________________________________________________________
    One of the major theological controversies in recent years has been the validity of the Satmar Rebbe’s claim that the Six Day War victory was ma’aseh Satan and whether miracles only happen to frum people. [There is of course Rav Moshe’s teshuva (Y.D. 4:8.2) regarding the miracle of Entebbe which clearly disagrees with the Satmar. ] But there is a little known or remembered event that happened shortly after the Six Day War which clearly defined the basis of dispute. This is the version I heard from Rabbi Gavriel Beer – a life long Aguda askan – who was there.

    As is well known by now, the mood leading up to the Six Days War was very gloomy. Many in Israeli and in the Diaspora were anticipating a war which would be very costly in life – both for the soldiers and civilian population. The more optimistic view was that Israel would take a harsh beating but would survive. There is no need to mention the pessimistic view.

    But when the guns were silent after the incredibly short war in June 1967, Israelis discovered that not only had they survived but they had soundly thrashed the massive armies of the surrounding Arab countries and in addition had acquired the West Bank – which included the Old City of Jerusalem and the location of the Temple. Everyone seemed to say it was an open miracle. There was one major dissenting voice – the Satmar Rebbe – who insisted that it was not only not a miracle but the victory was in fact the work of Satan. He emphatically stated that miracles don’t happen for the Zionist – especially to support the theological crime known as the State of Israel.

    Several months later at the annual Aguda Convention, this astounding event was the central topic of discussion Speaker after speaker spoke on the topic and the gedolim were clearly divided on whether to agree or disagree with the Satmar position. One of those who publicly agreed with the Satmar view was Rav Yaakov Kaminetsky.

    At the Melava Malka that weekend, the keynote speaker was Rav Itchie Meyer Levin – the Gerrer Rebbe’s son-in-law. He of course spoke about the topic. After some introductory comments he made the following observation. “Not so long ago the Jewish people suffered the horrible loss of 6 million Jews in the Holocaust. When we went to the gedolim for an explanation we were told that we must be silent and accept this because it was G-d’s will. Now we were just faced with another possible holocaust in the Land of Israel but the Jews were saved this time. We hear gedolim who say that these millions who were saved were saved by Satan. How is that when it comes to the death of Jews it is G-d’s work but when it comes to rescuing them from death it is Satan? It can’t be.”

    In response, Rav Yaakov Kaminetsky quickly wrote a note which he sent to be read from the podium. It said, “I want to publicly retract my previous statement supporting the view of the Satmar Rebbe and say that now I agree fully with what Rabbi Levin just stated.”

    Rabbi Beer noted that this was Rav Yaakov’s greatness. His only concern was truth and he wasn’t afraid to publically admit that he had erred.
    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    in reply to: Refuting the Three Oaths [Gimel Shevuot] #2277300
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    Yankel berel, Rav Henkin zt”l quotes this midrash Lekach Tov. Rav Henkin zt”l was so against the founding of Israel that he refused to join the Agudah of America, but once Israel was founded he felt we need to defend it:
    שמואל שאל ללוי בר סיסי מה בטח. א״ל בטוחים היו על כחו של זקן. 30כיון שראה יעקב אבינו אמר מה אני מניח את בני ליפול ביד האומות. מיד נטל חרבו וקשתו ועמד לו על פתחה של שכם. אמר שאם יבואו האומות העולם להרוג אותם אני אלחם כנגדם. הוא שהוא אומר ליוסף ואני נתתי לך שכם אחד על אחיך אשר לקחתי מיד האמורי בחרבי ובקשתי (שם מ״ח:כ״ב).
    That is quoted here, siman 109:
    https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=22080&st=&pgnum=232
    This backs you up on this point. Yidden don’t let other Yidden get killed, even if the original yidden acted improperly.

    in reply to: Cancel Bein HaZemanim #2277098
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    Back during the Yom Kippur War, Rav Chaim Shmulevitz zt”l said bein hazmanim should be canceled. Rav Shach zt”l argued and said that bitulo hu kiyumo. Rabbi Gershon Ribner shlita mentioned this a few months ago. So it’s an old machlokes.

    in reply to: Refuting the Three Oaths [Gimel Shevuot] #2275379
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    In 1955, The Satmar Rebbe zt”l was working on building certain areas in Yerushalayim and Bnei Brak. As he needed the cooperation of various Israeli officials, he moderated his position to just be a ban on general elections but not on municipal elections. So the Satmar Rebbe zt”l, could be quite practical in terms of dealing with Zionists and cooperating with them. These developments could also be said to be a violation of oleh kechoma and yet the Satmar Rebbe zt”l allowed them. ( (Neturei Karta wasn’t happy with this distinction to be sure, and they made a mechaah about the Satmar Rebbe’s heter for municpal voting). This is along with his practical cooperation with the Zionists to escape Hungary on the Kastner train, and his change in tone in the thirties when he moved to Eretz Yisroel tried to take control of the Eida Chareidis from Rav Dushinsky zt”l, and moderated some of his positions on encouraging sttlement in Eretz yisroel . As such, it’s safe to say that maaseh rav- if the Satmar Rebbe zt”l didn’t take every word of the Divrei Yoel as Torah Misinai then kol shekein to those of us who aren’t Satmar.
    As an aside , “The Satmar Rebbe didn’t pay for his Kastner train ticker the chassidim did” is one of the weakest deflections I have seen in this whole thread. Nobody pointed a gun at the head of the Satmar Rebbe zt”l and demanded that he take the train. He could have stayed behind and refused to go and cooperate with the Zionists. he didn’t and maaseh rav. One can cooperate with the Zionists for practical reasons, as paskened by the Satmar Rebbe zt”l himself.

    in reply to: Refuting the Three Oaths [Gimel Shevuot] #2274707
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    The Vayoel Moshe is very strongly against both settling in Israel and cooperation with the Zionists. Yet The Satmar rebbe zt”l himself tried moving to Eretz Yisroel twice- once in the 30’s in attempt to take over the Eida Chareidis from Rav Dushinsky, and once after the war to establish a new kehilla. As well, he cooperated with the Zionists to leave Hungary. So quoting the Vayoel Moshe as THE authoritative viewpoint when its author clearly didn’t think so it a bit sketchy.

    This isn’t to whitewash the sins of the Zionists, to be sure. They were reshaim.

    in reply to: Refuting the Three Oaths [Gimel Shevuot] #2270553
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    The shtikl from the Satmar Rebbe zt”l that was widely shared on social media after 10/7 (when NK was marching with antisemites regularly) was in Yiddish, with the satmar Rebbe zt”l saying that everything he said about the medina was tzvishin yiddin alein and one doesn’t encourage Arabs. I guess he did change his mind on that then.
    Rav Hutner zt”l, who employed Rav Avigdor Miller zt”l, was famously not happy with Rav Avigdor Miller zt”l after Rav Avigdor Miller zt”l helped write the ads, which is why Chaim Berlin got a new mashgiach when they moved.

    in reply to: Refuting the Three Oaths [Gimel Shevuot] #2270634
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    Neturei Karta is still trying to dismantle the state. Do we all agree they are wrong?

    in reply to: Refuting the Three Oaths [Gimel Shevuot] #2270621
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    UJM, it certainly is an admission, since NK clearly doesn’t hold that way, and Satmar didn’t hold that way. NK is trying to eliminate Israel even now, even though it means millions dead, because they view the state as Maaseh satan- sitra achra.

    in reply to: Refuting the Three Oaths [Gimel Shevuot] #2270556
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    I listened to an interesting Halacghe Headlines podcast, where the tziyoinish podcaster had an interview with Rav Eihchhorn shlit”a, a talmid muvhak of Rav Meir Soloveitchik zt”l. He got Rav Eichhorn to admit that while the medina shouldn’t have been created, at this point there is no Arab country that can take over and provide safety for yidden, so the medina is needed.

    in reply to: Refuting the Three Oaths [Gimel Shevuot] #2270548
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    Ha;eivi, try שם הגדולים להחיד”א
    ח”א סי’ ריט
    I am getting this from the daf- yomi.com kuntres on daf 112

    in reply to: Refuting the Three Oaths [Gimel Shevuot] #2270372
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    UJM, in 1967 the Satmar Rebbe zt”l put out a strong statement against NK, saying velamalshinim al tehi sikva and calling them Zionists. Was this a shinui in his shita or was there a chilluk in these 2 behaviors? As well, did the Satmar Rebbe zt”l give his deah to Arabs and Palestinians or did he view that as different? YBLCT the heintigge Satmar Rebbe Maharza”l said about NK that one is not allowed to strengthen the hands of rotzchim. Is this his eigene shita or does it come from the Satmar Rebbe zt”l?

    It’s certainly possible that the Satmar Rebbe zt”l changed his shita, originally viewing it a mitzvah to try to destroy Israel and then changing his mind and deciding to let Hashem decide. But then you would need a raya to go like the hava amina shita.

    in reply to: Refuting the Three Oaths [Gimel Shevuot] #2270328
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    Will do the OP a favor.
    The Reb Chaim Vital quoted that the 3 Oaths are only for a thousand years source is ר’ חיים ויטל מובא בתקופה הגדולה עמ’ תקעא

    in reply to: Refuting the Three Oaths [Gimel Shevuot] #2270280
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    To clarify, the Briskers and Satmars sound almost similar in their rhetoric on the tziyoinistim. However, they differ on these 2 major points:
    1. The Briskers follow the Rambam and shulchan aruch not nistar. So the 3 Oaths are not an inyan to them.
    2. They argue on the Satmar Rebbe’s maaseh Satan. In nigleh, the Satan is a weak angel who isn’t powerful enough to command armies and overturn war. The Satmar approach was based on nistar which has the Satan as more powerful and indeed closer to the Christian “devil”.
    After 10/7, the americans told the israelis to expect a certaindeath toll based on their experience in Falluja. The current Israeli death toll is 10% of that, 90% less. So if you say the tradiitonal Satmar pshat in maaseh Satan, the Stmar Rebbe zt”l would explain this miracle the same way. However, if you explain maasah satan away as the experts say it wasn’t a miracle, then Satmar would be forced to call this a miracle, which is ridiculous. This is also a maaseh Satan to them not a miracle. Brisk would call it a miracle done for the shomerei shabbos and lomdei Torah, not that the apikorsim and kofrim are raui to nissim like this.

    in reply to: Refuting the Three Oaths [Gimel Shevuot] #2270269
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    There seems to be a huge dismissal of the 1923 ratification by the League of Nations that this gave the Zionists permission to make a state. I am aware that the Satmar Rebbe zt”l virulently argues on this idea. However, this idea was said by R’ Meir Simcha of Dvinsk zt”l, who was viewed by many as the gadol hador of his time.
    This isn’t to say the tziyoinistim were correct in their shmad. But legabay the 3 Oaths it wasn’t an issue. The Maharsha on Kesubos 112a makes the same point by bayis sheini- once the Persian government gave reshus it was muttar , even though the local Shomronim opposed them.

    The Steipler takes an interesting approach. Yes it was a violation of the 3 Oaths but ee avid mahani- now that Israel exists it has the right to exist.

    The Satmar Rebbe zt”l is also a major deah to be sure.
    I was listening to the halacha headlines podcast and the host mentioned that one of the big advocates for the Satmar position goes on goyishe and Arabisher places to share his views. Did the Satmar Rebbe zt”l approve this? As far as I know he was against Neturei Karta. Thanks in advance.

    in reply to: Refuting the Three Oaths [Gimel Shevuot] #2270023
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    As Rabbi Ribner pointed out recently in one of his podcasts, the Briskers are very big into tziyoinistim yemach shemam vezichrom. HOWEVER, they don’t hold of the 3 Oaths as a thing. As well, Chazal say (Sanhedrin 64a, Yoma 69b) that the taava for avoda zara was battul. So if you take the Satmar Rebbe literally that Zionism is avoda zara, you are forced to say he’s arguing against befeirushe gemaras that there is no taava for avoda zara anymore. You are forced to say that he meant it as a melitza bealma so as not to have him being soseir the gamaras.

    Not a Zionist, not a Satmar, just trying to add some honesty in this debate.

    in reply to: Rally in Washington #2239401
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    If your Daas Torah says to go, go. if your Daas Torah says not to go, don’t go. That’s what Hashem wants you to do.
    Eilu va’eilu.

    in reply to: Why was the page about a jewish man ripping down posters removed? #2239400
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    My guess it was removed because Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro supporters complained. The Coffee Room wouldn’t exist without them constantly trying to convince others of their righteous path. They’re the frum version of vegans.

    I have no idea what I allegedly removed. There is nothing in the trash remotely resembling that.

    in reply to: The Israel Pogram of 2023 Jewish Massacre #2239000
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    We are confusing the reason and the excuse. The excuse is Zionism. but when marchers say Hitler should have finished the job, it’s clear that if Israel never happened they would still hate us. The pogroms in Europe happened long before the Zionists showed up.
    Not a Zionist, but blaming Israel for everything is as dumb as blaming tzniyus.

    in reply to: Neturei Karta: Do they have a Point? #2236521
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    UJM, NK are supposedly frum. They are exposed to Torah and Mitzvos, and are still choosing to be mechalel shabbos.
    As for otd youth, I have heard multiple psakim in terms of yom tov and cooking for them, but that’s for another thread. Maskim for many of them that they are reshaim. Some are rebelling against their parent not Hashem and would still be bechlal amisecha according to some poskim. Another poseik told me that if the otd person has one person they would not be mechalel shabbos in front of it would be enough. A third poseik told me that of course they are not bechlal amisecha, and when you cook for yuntiff you need to make a stew not chicken so there isn’t an individual piece that could be said it’s for them.

    in reply to: Chasing the elusive unicorn #2236515
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    A unicorn is a startup worth a billion dollars. You need to invest early to get on the ground floor of one of those.
    Oh, this is a shidduch thread, sorry.

    in reply to: Why isn’t Everyone a Gaon? #2235851
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    The ywn coffee room. It kills learning.

    in reply to: Neturei Karta: Do they have a Point? #2235849
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    They were mehalel shabbos befarhesya. Their point is they are no longer yidden. As such they are no longer bechlal amisecha, even worse than secular Zionists who at least have the svara of tinokos shenishbu.

    in reply to: Neturei Karta: Do they have a Point? #2235826
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    Does Spinoza have a point?
    Who cares about reshaim and if they have a point?

    Also, your copypasta from another old thread is kind of outdated, considering what just happened in mostly Muslim Dagestan.

    in reply to: Neturei Karta: Do they have a Point? #2235739
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    Why say Neturei karta’s point? It’s the Satmar Rebbe’s point. Why mention reshaim when you can mention a gadol?

    in reply to: Neturei Karta: Do they have a Point? #2235737
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    Well yes they have a point. Satmar Rebbe, whose shita they supposedly follow, said about them “Velamalshinim al tehi sikvah”. Yet they persist despite no backing from any gedolim. Their point is when one doesn’t have Daas Torah to follow, one can be a rotzeach.

    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    The people leading the demonstration were Neturei Karta. I’m sure they protested anything overly Anti-Semitic since they say they are just against Zionists not Jews.
    (Satmar Rebbe zt”l said about Neturei Karta “Velamalshinim al tehi sikva”. Amein!)

    The heter for wearing signs out of an eiruv is an interesting one.

    in reply to: Maharal’s Golem #2221072
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    There are a sach rabbeim in yeshivas who are unqualified and make goilems out of their talmidim.

    in reply to: Who’s job is it to get the Shul involved in lecha dodi #2220662
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    First we need to establish if there’s a chiyuv to say lecha dodi before we can establish if there’s a chiyuv to sing for lecha dodi.

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2220661
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    And Zionism, and Modern Orthodoxy

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2176233
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    n0m, that is what gedolim are for. Are gedolim tell us what is kefirah. And the litvish gedolim have spoken here.

    Hashem said lo Bashamayim hee, follow your chachomim. Hashem won’t have a moshiach candidate that goes against the chachomim.

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2174123
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    If you listen to the “stump the rabbi” videos, one of them by Rabbi Yosef Paltiel states that everyone agrees that the Rebbe is still alive, just a question of what to tell outsiders. So the Abarbanel and similar views are irrelevant as the die-hard meshichists believe that the Rebbe is alive.

    in reply to: Yeshivishe “Rayd” or “Reid” #2165763
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    Sanhedrin 38b:
    א”ר יוחנן בר חנינא שתים עשרה שעות הוי היום שעה ראשונה הוצבר עפרו שניה נעשה גולם שלישית נמתחו אבריו רביעית נזרקה בו נשמה חמישית עמד על רגליו ששית קרא שמות שביעית נזדווגה לו חוה שמינית עלו למטה שנים וירדו ארבעה תשיעית נצטווה שלא לאכול מן האילן עשירית סרח אחת עשרה נידון שתים עשרה נטרד והלך לו שנאמר אדם ביקר בל ילין

    So left right before shabbos. I am seeing people quote a midrash rabbah that Hashem let him stay until after shabbos. So machlokes in sources.

    in reply to: Yeshivishe “Rayd” or “Reid” #2165417
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    Is migui a din in mah li leshaker or koyach hataana

    in reply to: Yeshivishe “Rayd” or “Reid” #2165334
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    Is mara kama muchzak or chazaka

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 211 total)