☕ DaasYochid ☕

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 16,201 through 16,250 (of 20,615 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: I'm going to Ma'ariv now #1193091
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Twisted?

    in reply to: What to Bring for Shabbos #924962
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Wow, everything should go b’hatzlocha. Careful about the Stella D’oro – are they makpid on pas Yisroel, especially on Shabbos? Now’s not a good time for a frumkeit gaffe.

    I like the idea of a dried fruit platter l’kavod Tu Bishvat. You can do that without the cookies (I think that might be better even if they were PY or they weren’t makpid).

    in reply to: Israeli Chareidim moving to chutz la'Aretz? #942137
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Shmoolik 1,

    I do not want to be motzei shem ra. on anyperson or institution

    Then why did you?

    but what are the many non students doing in the yeshivos besides smoking and just hanging around why do they not serve or G-d forbid get a job

    Whether or not they should serve is a debate among the gedolim (nachal chareidi). But they obviously can’t get a job. What they should be doing is learning. Their bittul Torah is not just bittul Torah, it’s a chillul Hashem. But this is an individual’s shortcoming, it’s not institutional.

    in reply to: Israeli Chareidim moving to chutz la'Aretz? #942136
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Mdd,

    However, I think, the Chareidim overpushed their luck there.

    I’m not sure what you mean; if you mean that there are too many loafers who aren’t using their time productively, I am sure there are some, but I don’t know how many. I do know what I’ve read about the Chazon Ish’s take on it; he considered those who give undeserved exemptions to be rodfim, because they cast a negative light on the serious learners (IIRC). I believe the same is true for individual loafers, but I wouldn’t call that “the Chareidim”, because it’s not institutional.

    You can not just look at it form what is better for a bochur’s learning vantage point.

    That’s where we disagree. I can’t overstate the importance of learning in general, and specifically as it relates to the development of b’nei Torah. The very future of klal Yisroel is at stake, and this is the reason for the strong stance of the gedolim, as I understand it. It’s a no compromise issue.

    Thank you for speaking up agaist shmoolik’s post. I feel like Ican carry on a normal discussion with you. Although I disagree with you, I do think that you’re trying to be reasonable (as am I, I hope).

    in reply to: WHO was right in this situation? #1105428
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Popa would be right, except that after you husband agreed to go to the restroom, she should have dropped it. She’s a nasty, obnoxious person.

    Telling her she must be divorced was a bit much, but I can understand your emotional state at the time.

    in reply to: Do You Love Your Siblings? #923779
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    ICOT and OOM, yes, I’ve already ID’d him (although it was subtle, I don’t think anyone but he chapped. You know, he is very “choppy”).

    in reply to: Israeli Chareidim moving to chutz la'Aretz? #942127
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Mdd, it is about bittul Torah, and not just about not being able to learn forever. Even in chu”l, those who can, learn full time from mesivta (ad v’lo ad bichlal in most cases) until several years after marriage. Those very years, the ones in which someone is able to focus on their learning with some menuchas hanefesh and no or little burden of parnassah, are the ones which would be spent in the army.

    Army service would be a hindrance to the typical American yeshiva bachur as much as it would to one from E.Y.

    Aside from the spiritual danger (which is especially acute in those days of youth), they want to take away those ikar years of learning.

    Yes, as a result of the way the system is set up, they tend to learn longer than in chu”l. Rav Mordechai Zuckerman, zt”l, used to refer to these long term learners as “Ben Gurion’s talmidei chachomim”. And yes, therefore there’s an unhealthy negative attitude, for some, to working. But that’s primarily a product of potential army duty which forces the average amount of years in kollel to increase.

    If instead of drafting them into the army, they would allow them to work, many more would, but you wouldn’t hear this outcry.

    in reply to: Getting the other to say no #972116
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    T613t,

    I did not say it was ethical (my previous post was facetious, in response to popa). I think it is UNethical.

    I was only disagreeing with the degree to which it is wrong, assuming the other person wasn’t being hurt. Still, I think it is a lack of respect for the other, unless the motivation is purely to save them from hurt feelings (which it isn’t). So although I disagree with it, I don’t think it defines the person as selfish.

    If the other person is being hurt, I think it’s a horrible, selfish thing to do.

    in reply to: does anybody know if the Hakirah publictions editor is frum? #923823
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    The politician is not a religious figure.

    in reply to: What to do on Motzei Shabbos #923786
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Make a kumzitz with lots of Carlebach songs and stories.

    in reply to: Getting the other to say no #972104
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Ok, I take it back, it is ethical. Is that better?

    in reply to: akuperma #1114285
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I sometimes agrree, and sometimes disagree, with akuperma’s posts, but either way, they usually make me think.

    in reply to: Email when someone responds to a posting? #923307
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Popa, does it work? Even if it does, it can’t possibly tell you (unless I’m missing something) if there was a response to your specific comment, only if there was any new comment on the thread.

    in reply to: Do You Love Your Siblings? #923775
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Wolf, I don’t think ICOT was referring to you. He was warning against someone posting their negative feelings toward their sibs. You have, from what I’ve seen, only expressed love and admiration for your relatives.

    in reply to: Getting the other to say no #972100
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Manipulating the other for your gain is very wrong, and I am shocked at DY’s laissez faire attitude about it.

    I’ll take that as a compliment.

    I did say it’s unethical. You obviously think it’s much worse than that, but I’m not sure we’re talking about the same thing. I am not talking about someone acting obnoxiously, only what t613t was referring to, making it appear as if there’s a difference in hashkofah. The goal, I assumed, was that both parties would tell the shadchan that it’s not a good match, rather than than it being a unilateral “dump”. I would think that the dumped party, not knowing they were dumped, would actually be spared the insult which inevitably, if undeservedly, results from being dropped.

    Acting obnoxiously is almost never excusable. Except calling someone fat. 😉

    in reply to: Getting the other to say no #972085
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Sure, and I understand why people would want to kill people and steal their money and wives.

    This is probably not as bad.

    You could just as easily say that people would want to do it because it is uncomfortable to be the one saying no.

    that people would want to do it because it is uncomfortable to be the one saying no.

    You’re right, just as easy. But that’s pure weakness of character, whereas not wanting the shadchan to think you’re picky is practical, if you want them to redt you more shidduchim.

    If I thought someone was doing this to me, I would tell every shadchan I know and every friend of mine about it.

    That’s another good reason not to do it (especially since you never know, it might be Popa). I think being unethical (the reason I gave) is good enough, though.

    in reply to: Hechsherim in Miami Beach #923209
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    commonsense:Anyone know anything about which hechsherim in Miami Beach are reliable.

    shnitzy: KM and OU

    popa_bar_abba: http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/ou-kashrus-is-not-reliable#post-384209

    in reply to: I'm afraid it will be Popa #967928
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    So I told her that Popa would never agree to date her because she is fat. Now she’s mad at me, and doesn’t even know that I’m Popa.

    When you called her fat, she probably realized that you’re Popa.

    in reply to: Marriage Age #923159
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    People are not as mature as they use to be.

    Well, then they’d better get married right away before they turn into babies!

    in reply to: does anybody know if the Hakirah publictions editor is frum? #923821
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Yitzchokm,

    Oh, ok, sorry. So I’ve only been called a troll, not a borderline troll 🙂

    in reply to: Getting the other to say no #972081
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    OneOfMany,

    I didn’t say I like it, but it’s the reality. And I still think it shouldn’t be done, I just understand why one would want to.

    in reply to: akuperma #1114274
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Confucious,

    According to some, you’d be in the best position to know that. 😉

    in reply to: Must a boy who is in Shidduchim always be shaven? #924183
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Mom18,

    Ok, but this wasn’t a competition.

    in reply to: Getting the other to say no #972074
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I think I hear 613a’s point (the a is so that you’re not just a number).

    Saying no can be detrimental to shidduchim because it might alienate the shadchan who thinks you’re too picky. If the boy says no, if anything, the shadchan might feel bad for you and try to find a suitable match.

    The trick is to find an ethical way to do that. I don’t like your proposals also far.

    in reply to: Bagel Boss Kosher? #1095380
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    He says that R’ Schechter is fine, but that R’ Steinberg is no good

    For clarification, he undoubtedly meant the Steinberg who collects money through the “Cup K”, NOT the Rabbi Peretz Steinberg, Rabbi A. Schechter’s father-in-law, that popa was referring to. Rav Peretz Steinberg is extremely ehrlich. He is officially the posek for R’ Asher Schechter’s hashgocha, but has no hechsher of his own.

    in reply to: Must a boy who is in Shidduchim always be shaven? #924180
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I agree with Oomis. I would add, so should a man, so should a girl, and so should a woman.

    in reply to: does anybody know if the Hakirah publictions editor is frum? #923819
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    borderline troll

    I’ve been called a full fledged troll, that’s ok. This website is called Yeshiva World, you know.

    in reply to: Marriage Age #923157
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    My zivug isn’t running away…

    There are many possibilities of who to marry. You probably won’t marry the girl whose (father’s) name was in the bas kol.

    in reply to: The Most OVERrated Things in Life #923293
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Squeak, you’re not talking about the Modzitzer records with Ben Zion Shenker, are you?

    You’re not talking about Andy Statman, are you?

    Yes, I’ll admit that my collection has more than just that type, because there’s not enough to avoid boredom. But I agree that even the older “Jewish” music, from the 70’s, 80’s and forward, isn’t genuine either.

    in reply to: The Webberman Verdict #923079
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Ok, lots of ranting, but still no evidence.

    Just ask Sholom Rubashkin if the court system is fair to orthodox Jews.

    I’m not saying he’s innocent, but I don’t know that he’s guilty either. Aside from yichud not proving worse occurred (although it would certainly be a black mark), I don’t know where this information that he was alone in a triple locked room comes from. So far, nobody’s told me a reliable source for this.

    Of course there are horrible things going on in all communities. But when you go after someone with a good reputation, based on accusations from people with a horrible reputation (and no other evidence), how can you expect the community to react in any other way but as a victimized community?

    If the point was to have the community take abuse more seriously, it had the reverse effect. They will take any further accusations with even more skepticism than before.

    in reply to: The Most OVERrated Things in Life #923289
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Jewish music is not overrated, but the stuff that passes for it nowadays is.

    in reply to: The Webberman Verdict #923053
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    it is inconceivable that this was allowed

    Agreed. What is the evidence that this occurred?

    in reply to: What's wrong with the draft? #924105
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Mdd,

    It’s one thing to discuss an issue, but I hope you didn’t just say that you are being moche!

    in reply to: does anybody know if the Hakirah publictions editor is frum? #923816
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Apy,

    I doubt it. Maybe I’m just naive.

    in reply to: does anybody know if the Hakirah publictions editor is frum? #923815
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    1. I never read it and probably never will. I’d like to think that you either don’t remember it correctly or never understood it correctly to begin with.

    2a. I don’t know if he does either, but he is.

    2b. Which part is strong – that kefirah is assur or that there’s something called lifnei iver?

    in reply to: "Better Boys Than Girls??" #922864
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    This entire thread is based on a false premise.

    in reply to: Tzahal Sweatshirts #946649
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    613,

    No, that’s not what I’m saying.

    in reply to: Should i be called Miss/Mrs? #922483
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I didn’t say anything about a troll 😉

    in reply to: Tzahal Sweatshirts #946642
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Sorry, soldiers aren’t toilet plungers. Couldn’t you have thought of a better analogy for people who risk their lives to protect Yidden (no matter what their motivation might be)?

    Your analogy to sports teams is a pretty good one – some people wear those sweatshirts to show support for the team displayed, and some (although certainly a minority) simply because it’s stylish or because they received it from a fan or bought it in the local thrift shop.

    in reply to: What's wrong with the draft? #924096
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Kanoi,

    To get votes.

    in reply to: Toys Your Children Play With Most #922911
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    The baby.

    in reply to: Israeli Elections 2013 – Let's Talk Politics #927997
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    ZD,

    Of course it’s possible, but there are many (myself included), who feel that in this case, he doesn’t, even though he often claims to.

    in reply to: Taking Issue With High School Plays: What's The Goal? #961245
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    The “goal” of these plays (aside from keeping the girls busy), is to help develop latent talents and leadership abilities. If that hasn’t happened with you, 13, it’s a shame, and the production heads really should try to get everyone involved in the creative process.

    Not every part of school is optimal for everyone, but by focusing on something other than academics, a much higher percentage of girls are able to feel successful and accomplished.

    This is ultimately, IMO, more important than the academics.

    in reply to: Some notes about what it means to be truly poor… #1001126
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Oomis,

    He gave the # of his rebbe from Lander, not his shul’s rov.

    in reply to: Israeli Elections 2013 – Let's Talk Politics #927994
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    ZD,

    There were two reasons for R’ Moshe’s psak.

    1) Killing the recipient. This has likely changed.

    2) Killing the donor. This has likely not changed.

    Rav Moshe’s opinion is best represented by his son R’ Dovid.

    in reply to: Tzahal Sweatshirts #946640
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    613,

    I don’t think wearing a sweatshirt is an automatic show of support for whatever is behind the logo, as HaKatan opined. It may or may not be.

    in reply to: Israeli Elections 2013 – Let's Talk Politics #927992
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    GAW,

    No, I do understand your overall point, but I would hardly count R’ Chaim’s shitah as his own, and the Steiper’s was really the Chazon Ish’s. In E.Y., the shitah of the gedolim won’t change, (but the application might change because of circumstances).

    Where there is some divergence in the Yeshivish’e shitah is between the Briskers and everyone else. Rav Schach, who was very close with the Rov, supported elections (obviously), while the Briskers kept away.

    in reply to: Should i be called Miss/Mrs? #922470
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Some users profiles are interesting. For example:

    1)hardatwork

    Member Since

    January 21, 2013 (1 day)

    2)justwantagoodoy

    Member Since

    January 21, 2013 (1 day)

    Location

    Doesn’t like being called a troll.

    Occupation

    the big bad wolf should ask mechila

    3)young men (http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/profile/young-men)

    Member Since

    January 21, 2013 (1 day)

    Location

    cleveland

    Occupation

    learning part time

    Interests

    many

    4)boredsouls

    Member Since

    January 21, 2013 (1 day)

    5)agoodbygirl

    Member Since

    January 21, 2013 (21 hours)

    6)ShiraTobala

    Member Since

    January 22, 2013 (12 hours)

    7)yentapesha

    Member Since

    January 22, 2013 (2 hours)

    That’s seven usernames created within the last day or so, all on this thread, and sharing a bunch of other threads as well.

    I wonder if by any chance they know each other.

    in reply to: Tzahal Sweatshirts #946637
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    613,

    Hakatan said, “anything”.

    in reply to: Davening times #1178247
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I didn’t take a poll, but for krias Sh’ma, M’A; for sh’moneh esreh, Gr’a.

Viewing 50 posts - 16,201 through 16,250 (of 20,615 total)