Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 16, 2013 7:08 pm at 7:08 pm in reply to: Endorsing Political Candidates and Anti-Torah Values #959667simcha613Participant
playtime-
Not a good comparison. No candidate is a missionary for “toeivah” values either. No one is trying to convert the heterosexuals into homosexuals.
June 16, 2013 6:35 pm at 6:35 pm in reply to: Endorsing Political Candidates and Anti-Torah Values #959664simcha613ParticipantOut of curiosity, why is it so important to us that candidates are heterosexual and are against same gender marriage? Is it really our responsibility to make sure that Goyim keep halachah? Even if you assume that this is one of the 7 Mitzvos Bnei Noach, why should it bother us? It doesn’t bother us when a candidate is Christian or promotes Christian values even though Christianity is probably avodah zarah and also one of the 7 Mitzvos Bnei Noach (assuming that shituf is Avodah Zarah for Goyim).
Maybe these Rabbonim hold that it is not our responsibility to make sure that the Goyim are shomrei halachah… but rather our responsibility is to our own community and that there is ample funding from yeshivos and other Torah institutions. Why should we vote for a candidate who may mirror are values more accurately, but will be less beneficial for our yeshivos? Let’s look out for ourselves first.
simcha613ParticipantToi- didn’t the Rambam look up to Aristotle? I thought the Rambam said that Aristotle was one level below nevuah.
simcha613ParticipantJust wanted to point out, that it’s not within our control whether our children stay on the derech or not. Obviously we have to put in our hishtadlus with proper parenting and tefilah, but if Yitzchok Avinu couldn’t keep his son on the derech, that means that a lot of it is beyond our control.
simcha613ParticipantShalomtoyou-
I think you mean live and let die.
But seriously, I don’t think live and let live is a Jewish concept. Kol Yisrael areivim zeh bazeh- we are responsible for each other. If someone is in physical or spiritual danger (and with smoking it may be both- dangerous and halachically assur) then it is our responsibility to try and help our fellow Jew.
Also, having a debate on whether a particular action is assur or mutar is something we do all the time in other areas of halachah. We don’t say live and let live, but we try to uncover the truth. I don’t think we should pretend to not care about the halachic ramification of smoking just because it’s a sensitive topic.
simcha613ParticipantWould anyone’s answer change if they were married with kids when they found out they weren’t Jewish?
simcha613ParticipantToi-
Not sure if you’re serious or not… but if you are, I don’t think that’s what the Shulchan Aruch meant. The S”A clearly says that women receive reward for learning. I don’t think Adam received reward from eating the Eitz HaDaas.
Rationalfrummie-
It doesn’t sound like it’s a bedieved. S”A opens up with they receive sechar and only then says that it shouldn’t be taught. If sechar was only if they learned bedieved, I would have expected the S”A to begin with that it shouldn’t be taught to them and only then mention but if they do they still receive reward because it’s Torah.
Beniguman- That’s how I understand it. Since they aren’t obligated to do it and some aren’t able to it properly, it shouldn’t be imposed on them. However, a woman who is capable and wants to do it (for lishmah reasons, not feminist ones) can and should learn (as long as it’s not coming at the expense of areas of Torah that she is chayav to learn).
simcha613ParticipantTorahlishma-
I don’t think the Shulchan Aruch is that clear that women shouldn’t learn Gemara. While the S”A does say that anyone who teaches their daughter Torah (which we assume to mean Gemara) is as if they were taught tiflus, the S”A also says they receive sechar for learning Torah. If you look inside, it’s very clear that the same Torah that women receive sechar for learning is the same learning that is considered tiflus if taught to her. Obviously there are many ways of reconciling this, but my point is, is that it’s not clear that the S”A says they can’t learn. Why would they receive sechar for doing something they shouldn’t be?
simcha613ParticipantThis is a question for posters on all sides of this “machlokes:”
If following years and years of an enemy government occupying the Old City of Yerushalayim and not allowing Jews to even enter, a non-Jewish army miraculously defeated our enemy, took control of Jerusalem, and let Jews return to the Old City of Jerusalem to live and serve G-d there, would we be celebrarting that day as Yom Yerushalayim? Is there necessarily a relationship between Yom Yerushalayim and the Medinah?
simcha613ParticipantMod- maybe you should have a kosher sports section for that reason.
simcha613ParticipantAs much as it would be nice to win the lottery, it would probably be a curse in disguise. G-d punished the snake that he would have to eat the dust of the earth. It doesn’t seem like a punishment as there is so much dust, the snake will never go hungry. The punishment is that G-d is telling the snake, I don’t want you bothering me for parnassah, I don’t want a relationship with you, take your food and go. Winning the lottery (at least a lottery that would give you enough $$$ for the rest of your life), is kind of like that.
simcha613ParticipantIf I’m not mistaken, the Torah says a matzevah is assur because the Goyim do it. Rashi points out that even though Avraham Avinu did it first, since the Goyim took it up, it became Chukas Hagoyim.
simcha613Participanton the ball-
Some yes and some no. From the way I understand there are two Charedi positions about the existence of the medinah. Some would theoretically support a medinah, but are against the current one with its secular values. While others are against the concept of a medinah before Mashiach. They also view the army differently too. The first group may not see something inherently treif with the army, their position is that it doesn’t override Talmud Torah, and that the army needs to meet all the religious needs of its soliders. The other camp’s position is that one is not allowed to aid the medinah at all, as it is a ma’aseh Satan.
I could be wrong, and I don’t really have a proof for this (as I don’t know which camp any particular poster belongs to, and I don’t know which camp any particular Rov or group of Rabbonim belong to), but it seems that these two camps (not necessarily the Rabbonim but the “baal habatim”) look at the Religious Zionist position with more disdain then they look at each other’s position.
simcha613Participantefshir-
My point is, those who follow the Moetzes seem to be more critical of the Zionist rabbis who disagree than of the Charedi/Chassidish rabbis who disagree.
simcha613ParticipantI think this is one example of the criticism:
Rabbi Aviner: Draft Chareidim to Military of National Service
and yet none of the same criticism here:
simcha613ParticipantWhy do we eat matzah on Pesach Sheini? Even during the Beis HaMikdash there was no halachah for anyone to eat matzah on Pesach Sheini. Pesach Sheini was the day when the Korban Pesach was shechted for those who couldn’t make it the first time around. They ate the matzah that night with the Korban Pesach (on Motzei Pesach Sheini).
simcha613ParticipantTorah- the common factor is simple, things that a man shouldn’t walk in between. I have no idea why and I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s a different reason for all three.
April 15, 2013 3:37 am at 3:37 am in reply to: Possible reasons Orthodox man sat in plastic bag on plane :-) #956095simcha613ParticipantKanoi- is there a difference between “making jokes about somebody keeping the Halacha (according to his Posek)” and criticizing somebody about keeping the Halacha (according to his posek)? What about those who say Hallel on Yom Haatzmaus per their poseik or join the IDF as per their poseik? Which psakim may we poke fun at and criticize, and which are off limits?
simcha613ParticipantHaKatan- I understand most of the opposition to Religious Zionism but the Avodah Zarah part is beyond me. From what I understand on a very simple level (based on Wikipedia), Religous Zionism is the support of a building of a Jewish State in the Land of Israel. This is something that all of Klal Yisroel believes in, at the very least, when Moshiach comes. We all believe that after Moshiach comes we will have a Jewish State in the Land of Israel. I don’t understand how a concept is Avodah Zarah in pre-Moshiach times, but Avodas HaShem in post-Moshiach times. It’s either Avodah Zarah or it’s not.
simcha613ParticipantI always understood it as a symbol of hakaras hatov. The medinah, despite its many problems, has been HKB”H’s tool to bring Jews and Torah back to Eretz Yisroel, the likes of which have not been seen since the fall of Beitar. Just like we show hakaras hatov to other countries despite their problems (like USA on July 4 and [as the Ponavitzher Rav supposedly said] Lithuania on their independence day), we should show hakras hatov to the medinah. I’m not denying the medinah has been the source of some bad, but since when are bad things that people do an excuse to not recognize and show hakaras hatov for the good things they do?
simcha613ParticipantIn my mind, Yom HaAtzmaus is a day where I express my hakaras hatov for all the good that He has given us through the medinah similar to the way I view July 4 as a day to express hakaras hatov for the good that He has given us through the founding of the USA. Are there bad things that have happened (and that are currently happening) because of the Medina? Of course. But that’s not a reason to ignore the good and to deny hakaras hatov to HKB”H. Some of the good being that there are probably more Jews and more Torah in Eretz Yisroel since the fall of Beitar. I don’t think everyone has to do this on Yom HaAtzmaus, I just find this day meaningful for that goal because it was the beginning of the medina, but I do think everyone should recognize the good that has come from the Medinah and express gratitude towards Hashem for its founding.
simcha613ParticipantTehila, Menucha, Shalva
April 10, 2013 3:45 pm at 3:45 pm in reply to: How would you respond to Savage on Metzitzah #1027981simcha613ParticipantThe Gemara talks about metzitzah for health reasons. The Gemara also mentions bathing the baby in warm water for health reasons. Poshu pshat is there is no difference among the two, and just like we no longer bathe the baby in warm water because we don’t believe it to necessarily be healthy for the baby, we shouldn’t have to do metzitzah either if we don’t believe it’s healthy for the baby.
Some poskim however claim, that for reasons I don’t understand, metzitzah has become part and parcel of the mitzvah while bathing has not, therefore metzitzah must be done even if it no longer has known health benefits.
My question is, to the best of my knowledge, no where does the Gemara or the early rishonim say that metzizah has to be done directly with the mouth. Metzitzah just means to suction out the blood. It was done then directly with the mouth because their keilim weren’t sophisticated enough. What is the source that when the Gemara says metzitzah it must be done directly with the mouth and that the suctioning cannot be done with a tube? From the health perspective, it seems that both would accomplish the same goal, so why aren’t both valid ways of fulfilling this detail?
simcha613ParticipantHaLeivi- I thought that most peopler try and use a vegetable that one can’t use for marror (like a potato) for that reason.
simcha613Participantubiquitin-
If the marror will be covered by your borei pri adamah, why would you need a berachah achronah, regardless of how much you eat?
simcha613Participantnanny-
I’m not saying you have to pay $500 in order to enable someone to keep Shabbos, but there are people who give hundreds of dollars of tzedakah to kiruv orginzations so that not yet frum Jews will be shomer Shabbos. Is this much different?
On that note, since you aren’t receiving more for your money with that $500 because you could fly on equally qualitative airlines for $500 cheaper, and the only reason you are spending $500 extra for El Al is to enable them to be Shomer Shabbos… can you count that as ma’aser?
simcha613ParticipantAre there Achronim that resolve the contradiction? I always thought that most understood that Rambam pshuto kemashmao, that you’re not allowed to take money for Torah (which includes learning Torah, teaching Torah, being the Rav of a community). Most argue with the Rambam, saying no one become Rabbonim if that were the din, but I didn’t realize there are those who try and reinterpert the Rambam. The Rambam in Hilchos TT only says they are potur from serving in the army, it says nothing of them being supported.
simcha613ParticipantThe argument can be made that the reason El Al is more expensive is because they don’t fly on Shabbos. Spending the extra money on El Al might help them to retain their shomer shabbos status. If they don’t make enough money, they may consider lowering their prices and start flying on Shabbos to make up the lost revenue.
Additionally, supporting Jews is always better than supporting non-Jews (though $500 may be too steep a price for this).
simcha613Participantabra-
I didn’t address your first two points because I agree with them. In other words, if the army can’t be relied upon to meet religious needs or if a person follows those opinions that the Medinah is ma’aseh satan, then I understand why a person would avoid the army even if it means not working and living in poverty. That’s why I started with my two assumptions which addressed your points.
My question was, if (and I’m not saying that that’s the reality) the Medina would meet all of a person’s religous needs, and if a person subscribes to a shitah that attributes no positive or negative significance to the medinah, why is there an issue of going to the army? Why isn’t it treated as a prerequisite to earning a parnassah?
And I know my question doesn’t address all learners because I don’t want to discuss whether learning is more important than army service. That debate has been (and is still) raging on on this site. I am simply asking that if a person would decide to stop full time learning in order to work, why is it problematic for that person to join the army (or some other national service if that option exists) simply in order to enable him to enter the workforce?
simcha613ParticipantAbra-
I’m not suggesting that serving in the army is more important than Talmud Torah. However, many would agree, that one is allowed to stop learning Torah in order earn a living. For the same reason, I assume one is also allowed to stop learning to take classes in order to be able to earn a living. Why can’t one stop learning in order to serve in the army, not because serving is more important, but because serving enables one to earn a parnassah?
simcha613ParticipantNot do as they please, they just can form the cabinet (and if they want to make deals to give other parties cabinet posts, they can do that too). Other than that, every issue is put to a vote and majority wins. Why do you need a coalition for that? The winning party may not win on every issue, is that such a problem? Do you really need a coalition to run the government?
simcha613ParticipantSometimes there just isn’t anything to say…
simcha613ParticipantDaniela- I’m talking about a case where he doesn’t have an obvious preference and he is asking for your judgment.
simcha613ParticipantI heard that there are two ways of reading “ad delo yada.” Either it means that the chiyuv is to reach the point of ad delo yada. OR the chiyuv only exists until that point, but if you go beyond it, then it is too much. In other words, you are yotzei the chiyuv as long as you drink anywhere between more than usual and ad del yada. If you go beyond ad delo yada, then you have lost out.
simcha613ParticipantZABACHUR- unfortunately, there aren’t too many of those in NY
simcha613ParticipantTo play devil’s advocate- about the oneg Shabbos issue, yes all learning is enjoyable for the Neshoma, but people like learning different areas. For someone who usually learns Chumash because that’s what they enjoy, but is “forced” to study for a Gemara test which he enjoys less… I could see that as lessening oneg Shabbos.
And hachanah- if you would be doing something else, but are only learning this because of the test, why wouldn’t that be hachanah? So, I have heard that if you are taking a nap on Shabbos because you want to stay up late, you are allowed to on Shabbos since it is inherently enjoyable, as long as you don’t say you are taking a nap for after Shabbos purposes. I guess that argument would apply to studying Torah on Shabbos.
February 5, 2013 2:35 pm at 2:35 pm in reply to: Making Sunday an official day off in Israel #927064simcha613ParticipantSheishes yamim ta’avod! Shabbos and only Shabbos is our day off!
February 4, 2013 8:37 pm at 8:37 pm in reply to: Saving A Pets Life – How Much Should I Spend? #926926simcha613ParticipantI don’t think this is a din in tzaar baalei chaim. I don’t think you have any requirement to spend any money to save it (you just can’t cause it more harm). I also don’t think it’s bal tashchis because you’re are getting what you believe is your money’s worth.
In short, I think you should spend however much you want to spend, and if you decide it’s too expensive then you shouldn’t feel guilty.
simcha613ParticipantZK- I disagree completely! The Rambam (and I think the Gemara too) says that a person should not say I don’t want to do something that’s assur (like eat pork) but rather we should say I want to do aveiros! I have a ta’ava for pork! But what can I do? Hashem told me not to and I follow His will.
We’re not supposed to ignore that which is frustrating, we’re supposed to embrace it and say even though it’s frustrating, Ill still do it because that is the ratzon Hashem.
simcha613ParticipantIf a coalitions is formed, which means they have the majority, they can pass any laws they want? Does the opposition have any power at all?
simcha613ParticipantYUTorah has many daily iyun shiurim on their website. R’ Schachter, R’ Sobolofsky,R’ Simon, R’ Willig, and R’ Rosensweig are some of the Roshei Yeshiva that try and put every single one of their iyun shiurim on the website daily. This year they’re doing Bava Metziah and the past few years they did Yevamos, Pesachim, Bava Basra, Gittin, and Berachos.
simcha613ParticipantI’ve asked that question before and I never received an answer that satisfied me. The only thing I can think of that differentiates those 5 seforim is that they are the only seforim in Kesuvim that are read publicly on a holiday.
simcha613ParticipantDerech- the same cutoff that exists for working. When a person can’t learn full time, even if he can learn part time, still it is expected of him to sacrifice learning and get a job. We don’t expect that a part time learner should be supported by the community, even if working full time means sacrificing more learning. So too, if he can’t learn full time, then he has to follow the rules of the society even if it means sacrificing more learning. It’s irrelevant what is more important. An hour of learning is more important than a full time job, but I don’t think it’s acceptable for a person not to work, be a burden on the community so he can learn that extra hour.
simcha613Participantavhaben- I disagree with some of your points.
1. If that’s the attitude, then government funding shouldn’t be taken either. That’s like taking goods from a store but because you oppose its existence then you refuse to pay for it. If you are benefiting from the State, then you also have to pay for it whatever they charge, be it taxes and/or service. If you oppose its existence to the point that you won’t follow its rules, then you can’t take the benefits either.
2a. A desire is not enough. You also have to be willing to put in the time an effort. Many guys genuinely want to sit in Kollel, but they waste time when they shouldn’t be… either by missing sedorim or not learning as hard as they can when they are in seder. The people who should be in kollel are not necessarily the strongest learners, but those who want to be there and are willing to put in as much effort in their learning as they can for all the required amount of time.
2b. There is a concept of “yagata umatzata ta’amin, yagata velo matzata al ta’amin.” Basically translated as if a person says they put in effort (in Torah) and were successful then you should believe them, but if they say they put in effort but didn’t succeed then don’t believe them (that they put in effort). There is a havtachah that a person who puts in effort in learning will be successful (though I admit, I do not know how to define success). While it is true that even a poor learner has the right to sit in Kollel, if he doesn’t succeed in his learning, it implies that he is not trying so hard.
3. I don’t know the metzius, but assuming the medinah will expand Nachal Charedi (which I don’t know if they plan on doing that), then it should be fine. And even if it doesn’t, the army lichorah is no more pritzusdik than your average job in Israel or America. Yeshiva should prepare Benei Torah to be able to work in the real world and to overcome these challenges. If the army will turn frum draftees into chilonim, then our parents and yeshivos have failed us. Are you saying that no frum person should be allowed to work because the secular world is inherently a pritzusdik environment?
4. Even in the times of Moshe and Yeshoshua they had armies. The soldiers were the talmidei chachamim. Hashem told Gidon specifically to take the best people for the army. Learning Torah is the true protection, but not to the exclusion of derech hateva. In fact, it’s probably even better protection if the Talmidei Chachamim bring their zechusim to the battle field.
5. I don’t know if that’s true. If the government wants them to serve then that implies they need them. Maybe I’m wrong. I guess I’m still naive and believe that the secular government is not “anti-frum” they’re just not frum and I don’t believe that the government of Israel is trying to get rid of the Chareidim and Kollel.
simcha613Participantsnowbunny- so how to you understand the halachah that says you should dress for davening as if you were standing in front of a king? It just means don’t dress sloppily but it doesn’t necessarily mean dress nicely?
simcha613Participant“I am guessing that you are a baal teshuva.”
Aren’t we all? 🙂
simcha613ParticipantR.T. that question exists even without the targum. A Cohen can’t remarry his divorced wife even if she didn’t marry someone in between.
simcha613ParticipantI agree with the Goq. It’s like if someone stole $100 from you and then asks for forgiveness but refuses to give the money back.
simcha613Participantzahavasdad- well according to R’ Schachter, sheidim has nothing to do with ayin hara.
simcha613ParticipantR’ Schachter from YU understands the concept of ayin hara in a much more rational way. He explains based on the pesukim that talk about if someone takes advantage of a widow or an orphan and they pray to G-d, then G-d will avenge them. I think Rashi asked why is it necessary for them to pray for G-d to act with justice? Rashi explains that G-d will punish the sinner anyways, but he is quicker to respond when there is tefilah.
Based on this, R’ Schachter explains that an ayin hara is simply a tefilah that someone shouldn’t have something. For example, if a person sees someone who has a nice house and complains (even in his heart) that he doesn’t think this person deserves that house, then if he truly doesn’t deserve the house, Hashem will take it away. It could be that Hashem was going to give this person time to “earn” the house, but He is quick to respond to tefilah. However, if the person truly deserves the house, then no amount of tefilah or ayin hara can take that away from him.
Based on this, the way to get rid of an ayin hara is to do teshuvah, daven, and learn Torah.
-
AuthorPosts