akuperma

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 3,251 through 3,300 (of 3,439 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: ADD (ADHD) is it real? #874208
    akuperma
    Participant

    One could argue that the behavior they are describing are well within the parameters of “normal” behavior. Of course, the medical community derives very little parnassah from treating anyone who is “normal.” There is a danger that a child so diagnosed will end up having his life ruined by dangerous drugs, and will give up trying since he’ll accept the definition that he’s defective to begin with.

    In the past, our community never so isolated kids who less than 200% perfect, so even believe in ADD is something “hadash” not sanction or based on Torah.

    in reply to: Over 70% of Orthodox Jews are Chareidim #1098085
    akuperma
    Participant

    If you use a narrow definition of “Orthodox” (for example, man always covers his head even at work, married women likewise – perhaps including refraining from discussing secular business and politics and Shabbos), and then use a broad definition of Hareidim (holds that if halacha conflicts with Israeli law, which includes orders in the army, halacha must be followed at all all times) – then I wouldn’t be surprised is 80% of “Orthodox” are “Hareidi”.

    But if you include as Orthodox people who merely refuse to go to work on Shabbos and don’t do malachos on Shabbos, hold by checking ingedients not just checking hechsherim, wear a yarmulke only for davening, etc.) and limit Hareidim to those who refuse to participate in any aspect of the secular economy, insist on dressing in a way that isolates them from the rest of the world, etc. – the the Hareidi percentage falls.

    in reply to: The internet #873964
    akuperma
    Participant

    By “internet” do you mean anything using the various internet protocols, which really is a problem since the internet is simply the system using the telecommunication system. By that definition, “internet” includes telephone, the entire banking system, all credit cards, and virtually all sources for hearing news. Not using the internet means living with an 18th century level of technology.

    If by internet you are referring to “graphic browsers” one could exist without them, using PINE mail, LYNX and not much more. You would probably lack access to the banking system and telephonic communications.

    If you say the objection is to certain websites, there is no hiddush. As older people may remember, it is prohibited to look at undressed people acting improperly even if it is offline. Obscene literature was probably invented about the same time as writing – it isn’t a function of the internet.

    in reply to: whats the matziv with jeans? #873680
    akuperma
    Participant

    Are you using “jeans” to mean “denim” or “pants”. Are you talking about work or dress?

    In general, “denim”, the fabric form which “bluejeans” or “dungarees” are made is used for physical work, and is considered to be undressy. It is what you would wear to work if you are on a construction site, not what you would wear to work in an formal office (especially in the well dressed East Coast of the US, other areas are less formal). It would be inappropriate to wear when visiting the President or the monarch, or appearing in court – so, kal vehomer, in shul.

    If you are talking about “jeans” to mean “pants” the answer is the same as to whether you wear “pants” – which depends on a variety of personal factors.

    in reply to: Yo mama jokes #1004813
    akuperma
    Participant

    I wouldn’t make or laugh at such jokes if they were directed at anyone created in HaShem’s image.

    in reply to: YaHarog V'Al Yavor. #873302
    akuperma
    Participant

    Gloi arayos (can’t discuss it on YWN – it rarely happens except in wartime – unlikely to occur to a soldier in a modern army)

    Avodah Zarah (particularly if done in public)

    Spilling blood (e.g. if a doctor was order to perform an abortion and threated with death for disobeying – not an everyday issue)

    However on all the things that one must give up your life rather than violate, just because you arent’ threatened with death doesn’t mean to ignore them – it means you should be very willing to give up your parnassah to avoid them, since Kal ve’Homer you would be required to give up your life to avoid doing them.

    in reply to: Woman Should Always Wear Her Wedding Ring in Public? #873600
    akuperma
    Participant

    The wearing of the wedding ring is actually a goyish custom which serves no function since in our community married women wear distinctive clothing (head coverings) that serve the function of indicating if they are available.

    Practically, since in our community almost all women gain weight shortly after marriage (when they get pregnant, which, Baruch ha-Shem, is routine among us), I doubt most married women could get their wedding ring on very easily unless they have it re-set (and since our rings are plain gold – unlike the goyim’s which are much fancier, that’s not too practical).

    in reply to: Convert Becoming A Rabbi #1151520
    akuperma
    Participant

    The problem with a Ger (or a Baal Tseuvah) becoming a Rov is that by the time they get started, even in their early adult years (children rarely have the independence to change religiously), every else has a 20 year head start. Ask yourself what chance someone who was illiterate at age 25 would have of becoming a great writer (some had, but not many)?

    in reply to: Having Respect for Your Elders, Kohanim and Rabbonim #898076
    akuperma
    Participant

    One should have respect for everyone created by HaShem. Being created in HaShem’s image seems to be a good enough endorsement as being worthy of respect.

    in reply to: Obamas position on gay marriage #875537
    akuperma
    Participant

    Are you suggesting he should run on the basis of his economic policies? With the growing problems in Europe, that might not be something he’ll want to talk about.

    Most conservatives will vote for Romney anyways, but this way he can rally his base (frei Jews, gays, etc.). It might backfire since a big chunk of his base (particuarly blacks and Hispanics) won’t be amused, but that’s a risk he’s willing to take.

    in reply to: Discuss the (soon to be expiring) Tal Law Here #874365
    akuperma
    Participant

    rabbiofberlin:

    You think we are extinct. We survived. We are still here. We are prospering. Just as in many previous times, we survived because HaShem saved us. What are the elements of survival:

    1. Yeshivos. As long as some yeshivos survive, they manage to grow again. Indeed, there are probably more people learning Torah full time than there were in 1939. And yes, this is relevant to disucssing the Tal law. Those who are learning Torah, and in doing so giving up most of their parnassah, are the key to Jewish survival. THere will always be pograms, but as long as we have a core learning Torah, we will survive.

    in reply to: Discuss the (soon to be expiring) Tal Law Here #874348
    akuperma
    Participant

    rabbiofberlin:

    The Jews of Eastern Europe were hardly anhiliated, nor was the “the beauty of European jewry totally destroyed”. We survived. We won. The leading yeshivos are alive and well and bigger than before the war (can you say the same for the non-orthodox seminaries of central Europe). We are still around, and thriving (the Nazis are considered a total joke in Europe). Yes we had casulties, but we won that battle. HaShem against all odds managed to get some of our other enemies (Stalin of all people, with some belated help from the Americans and Brits) to rescue us (how Purim-dik, and we didn’t even have to get them drunk first).

    in reply to: Discuss the (soon to be expiring) Tal Law Here #874342
    akuperma
    Participant

    1. If the Israelis wanted a large number of Hareidi to sign up, they could make the army friendly for frum soldiers in ways that would not impact on the military matters, such as a rule requiring all soldiers to observe the laws of yichud and negiah and a strict “non-fraternization while on duty or on base” policy. They could run the army like the handful of segregated frum units in terms of leaving time for davening, kashruth, Shabbos. They choose not to. However if they made the zionists institution “frum-friendly” it would radically change Eretz Yisrael and alienate the secular zionists who run the state but are increasingly unwilling to serve in the army.

    2. Perhaps 10% of the yeshiva students are anti-zionists (who refuse to accept zionist subsidies). If the army tries to draft them they will resist and trying to arrest them will seriously hurt Israel’s image and undermine the argument that it is a Jewish homeland. It is better politically to say they are to busy learning to serve in the army rather than saying that zionism is apikorsis. Drafting the yeshiva students would turn Neturei Karta into a serious political movement, with its membership being measured in thousands rather than dozens.

    3. Drafting unwilling, unhappy and disloyal soldiers is a good way to undermine the ability of the army to defend the country. Repeal of the Tal law, meaning conscription of the yeshiva students, is probably the Palestinians’ best chance of getting a state with Jerusalem as its capital, and Yaffo-Tel Aviv as its largest city.

    4. Of course, for those of us who believe in HaShem and His Torah, we know that in fact it is the yeshiva students, who show tremendous mesiros nefesh in giving up any chance of a middle class lifestyle to learn Torah, who are really the ones defending Eretz Yisrael. If the government closes down the yeshivos, and forces the Hareidim to flee to other countries, HaShem will probably close down the zionist enterprise once and for all. But that’s only background to the above debate.

    in reply to: Justice in Balto.? #874518
    akuperma
    Participant

    1. One was acquitted.

    2. Due to denial of a jury trial and use of hearsay evidence, the appeal of the convictiom has a good chance.

    3. The kid who was convicted doesn’t seem all that innocent. He was seriously violating Shomrim’s policies. Note that when the Shomrim arrived, they appear to beieve the “victim” had been wrongfully attacked.

    in reply to: didn't sell dish before pesach #872386
    akuperma
    Participant

    No one sells the dishes on Pesach. You sell the hametz that might be on the dish, and store the dishes in an area that is rented to a goy. However the prohibition is on the hametz that is on the dishes, in case there is any.

    in reply to: Learning during Chazoras Hashatz #1089003
    akuperma
    Participant

    Isn’t that when you are supposed to be chatting or texting or something like that???????????

    in reply to: Heteirim for Copying and giving out Music #876274
    akuperma
    Participant

    So which Rav said its permissable to take a recently published book, that is still being sold in the bookstore, and make copies and sell them yourself? Or a new CD that is still on sale?

    There’s a question of “fair use” whenever your copying doesn’t deprive the owner of his income, or perhaps for personal use under certain conditions – put going into business against the creator of the work by making and distributing copies so people won’t have to pay for it? Who says that’s allowed (Purim “torah” excluded).

    in reply to: Heteirim for Copying and giving out Music #876259
    akuperma
    Participant

    The best heter is to ask the author/performer and get permission.

    It is probably “fair use” under everyone’s law if the work in question isn’t available commercially so you aren’t depriving anyone of their parnassah. And under American law, it becomes

    “public domain” after a certain time – so an original Breslov melody can be used under American law without paying R. Nachman’s descendants a royalty (and halacha was usually more conservative about the time periods than the goyim).

    in reply to: Yom Haatzmaut, min Hashamayim??? The Atbash cipher. #943779
    akuperma
    Participant

    Reality. The Brits were bankrupt. They couldn’t use colonial troops in Palestine since they might pick up ideas to do the same thing – meaning most of the British army was tied up in Palestine. The Arabs were so racist they assumed they didn’t need to prepare for a serious war – when they attacked they brought bags to loot rather than extra ammunition. In arguing that the Israeli victories weren’t a miracle, the Satmarer Rebbe (the original) said the reason the zionists won was that the Arabs weren’t very good soldiers. No miracle.

    in reply to: JFK baggage policy #870467
    akuperma
    Participant

    Airports don’t have baggage policies. Airlines do. The only thing the airport management worries about is smuggling a weapon, and teh federal government has largely taken away any discretion in that area.

    in reply to: Torah vs. IDF #870401
    akuperma
    Participant

    How is it a Milhemes Mitzvah? It’s a fight about money and real estate. Are the Palestinians demanding that Jews stop learning Torah? Do they demand the Jews open their shops and drive their cars on Shabbos? Are the Arabs demanding the Jews wear immodest clothes and engage in lewd behavior (such as women singing in front of men, not to mention many other things we don’t talk about on YWN)? Are they insisting that people other than our gedolim control religious community life (run mikvas, shuls, etc.). Do they even demand we say hallel on their holidays?

    The goyim were willing to let Orthodox Jews live in peace in Eretz Yisrael. The war began when the zionists demanded political control (and that the Arabs be reduced to a secondary status). Had the gedolim staying in control, as they were before 1914, there would have been no war. It’s the hilonim’s war – let them fight it. We should worry about our own survival, which is a function of Torah and Mitsvos.

    in reply to: Are Heimish Foods Unhealthy? #869995
    akuperma
    Participant

    As with most other peoples (e.g. Blacks, Hispanics of Native American origins), we have a cuisine designed for people who are starving. One should remember that calorie deficiency leads to an immediate and painful death. Our cuisine lacks many meat dishes (we could never afford much meat) and has minimal cheese (also a luxury item, even if most Ashkenazim weren’t lactose intolerant as adults). Sugar is a recent innovation in Europe, and it isn’t part of our traditional cuisine (same for corn produces). Bread and potatoes won’t kill you unless you overeat. Diabetes is largely a function of too much food and too little exercise, rather than a specific cuisine. High chloresterol could never be a problem with traditional Jewish cuisine since we couldn’t afford red meat and cheese. Given that Pizza (and hamburgers and hot dogs, not to mention sugar) have become the most popular foods of American Jews, I would attribute the health problems to American, rather than Jewish cuisine.

    akuperma
    Participant

    Chronology over that sort of time period is always subjective. That’s why there are disputes even within hazal, and all the more so with the goyim involved. Even in our lifetimes one sees how problems developed (ask an American how long World War II was, and see if you get the same answer as a European, or an East Asia).

    in reply to: bochurim/girls "learning" in israel #871626
    akuperma
    Participant

    In all fairness, Americans at that age (18, fresh out of high school, away from home for the first time) have a global reputation for “partying” instead of learning. We would prefer greater studiousness and piety from our children, they do behaive a lot better than the goyim the same age.

    Arguably, they would be better off staying at home with their families, but children that age think they are grown up and are restless to leave home.

    Traditionally, this is when they got married. They are too old to be children in their parents’ houses.

    in reply to: Racist Maniac #869269
    akuperma
    Participant

    But think of the tax dollars we save by not locking up deranged people unless they hurt someone. And since many of the seriously deranged are unable to care for themselves, they often expire, thereby saving us more tax money. It’s quite efficient.

    in reply to: Hamistakel Betzba Ktana Shel Isha #970632
    akuperma
    Participant

    Mistakel implies looking intensively, perhaps more like to stare.

    If a man avoided looking at women he would keep bumping into them since he wouldn’t see them coming, and that would raise many more problems.

    in reply to: Jewish Movies #898342
    akuperma
    Participant

    Do you mean the handful of commercially produced movies produced by groups that include frum Jews, such as “Ushpizin”, “Time of Favor” (in Hebrew, Ha-hesder), or Arranged? Are you discussing some “movies” that are produced within the Hareidi community, with all male casts, that in the past have been distributed in non-conventional ways, often on CDs. Are you asking about Jewish related subject in regular movies aimed at goyim?

    in reply to: George Zimmerman #868238
    akuperma
    Participant

    1. The people saying it was “murder” have a reputation of “crying wolf” (e.g. the Duke Lacrosse team “rape” case, which ended with the prosecutor being disbarred for falsifying evidence). Note that the broadcast network making the charges was caught editing the “911” tape which as broadcast made it appear that Zimmerman was foaming through the mouth racist, but in the original version before editing makes him appear to be someone under attack who discussed race only when the police asked for a description.

    2. The overwhelming tendenacy of the leading Democrats to regard urban crime as a non-issue, while they tend to live in comfortable suburbs or buidlings with private security. The liberal media are indifferent to urban crime – which has been a problem for many people who follow YWN.

    3. Under American law, Zimmerman is supposed to be assume to be innocent, meaning under the poltically incorrect version of law in the American constitution, the prosecutor needs to prove he wasn’t attacked (assume he pleads self-defense). Given the fact that it was Zimmerman who contacted the police (something very few criminals do — usually its the victim who calls 911), there appears to be some substance to Zimmerman’s defense.

    in reply to: Pesach circa 1980 VS Pesach 2012 #867649
    akuperma
    Participant

    Our community is growing. All the cute little babies from 1980 are now parents, or even grandparents(or as economists would call them, consumers). So of course there are more products available.

    Since good kashruth puts bad kashruth out of business (it doesn’t cost all that much more to do kosher properly, and you get a bigger market), of course the standards are rising. Why make imitation hametz out of matza crumbs when you can make it out of potato starch, probably for the same or less cost, and increase your market share.

    in reply to: No Taxation with Representation #867342
    akuperma
    Participant

    America is a democracy. We tax ourselves. If public opinion favored closing down government services and abolishing taxes, it would come to pass. The fact that most people favor high services but without the taxes to pay for them is an interesting problem, and potential crisis. Note the absence of people demanding they pay more taxes, as well as the absence of people demanding fewer services and benefits.

    Torah is not a democracy. Torah states much of what we as a community must provide, and gives a framework for raising the money. Given the needs of supporting the poor, educating all children and supporting a high level of scholarship, there is a problem that needs always exceed income. So we rely on Ha-Shem and since we’ve survived this long, we must be doing something right.

    in reply to: Is smoking mutar? #954570
    akuperma
    Participant

    Those who hold that smoking is mutar (and especially, allowed on yuntuf) are relying on various Ahronim who 400-500 years ago approved of smoking after being told that smoking was healthy (they know about the high from nicotine, but not the side effects). I doubt one can rely on a pasak halacha that was clearly based on a specific scientific premise (“since we have been told by our doctors that smoking is good for you, it is allowed”) that has since been rejected.

    in reply to: Why cant we eat chometz on pesach? #867181
    akuperma
    Participant

    OF course we CAN eat hametz on Pesach. We CHOOSE not to do so since it is a mitzvah not to do so. Most of us are so attached to the mitzvah we even avoid anything that resembles hametz, such as foods made with a little grain mixed in, or even non-grains that look like and can be cooked in a manner similar to grains. But if we COULD NOT eat hametz on Pesach, where would be the zechus in refusing to do so.

    in reply to: Posting on erev pesach #866298
    akuperma
    Participant

    Since Erev Pesach largely has the din of Hol ha-Moed, wouldn’t it depend on whether the post is relevant to a discussion that is relevant over the Moed (such as, “should I go to the Yankee-Orioles game on Hol ha-Moed”, rather than “what would happen if neither New York not Boston is in the playoffs”), or alternatively, if it relates to something that would be a financial loss (e.g. “should I short the Euro for next week”, as opposed to “which value stocks should I buy not to fund my retirement in ten years?).

    in reply to: Whats an english name for "Shemuel" besides Sam? #866588
    akuperma
    Participant

    The modern English equivalent is “Samuel” which is a common English name. “Sam” is a common abbreviation. The name is found in their translations of Taanach so it isn’t “strange” sounding to them.

    Names such as Sherman and Seymour or Sigfried are non-Jewish names with different meanings that are adopted in order to obscure your Jewishness. The different meanings can be a problem (“Sherman” is actually a family name that is popular in America since it was the name of a great general who liberated much of the south during the civil war – making him a hero to northern whites and southern blacks, but not to many southern whites who didn’t quite see it the same way). Shmuel is slightly problematic for English speakers since the initial consonant combination is unknown in English, as is the vowels combination in the end.

    Of course one can always use the Jewish name “Shmuel” on official documents, and use “Sam” as a nickname when going among the goyim.

    in reply to: Trayvon Martin #863436
    akuperma
    Participant

    The only facts not in disupte are that Zimmerman shot an unarmed person, after phoning the police, and that the Democrats have decided this is an issue to mobilize their African American base.

    It could turn out that Zimmerman freaked out and fired needlessly,or it could turn out this is like Duke “rape” (ended with the DA getting disbarred) or some of Al Sharpton’s previous fanatasies.

    in reply to: Yeshivish Good Learners Who Want to go to College #862130
    akuperma
    Participant

    It shouldn’t be a big problem. Remember what our kids do in high school is the same materials, and at a higher level, than what the goyim’s universities do in graduate school (e.g. classical materials in original language, with medieval texts in the original). If he’s a good learner, it means he can prepare on his own as needed for whatever subject he’s interested in, even a hard major such as ones requiring serious math such as the sciences, engineering or economics. All it takes is brains and hard work, and if he did well learning Torah, college will be piece of cake.

    Of course “easy” schools like Touro are fine if you are rich, but if he’s smart he probably can get a scholarship for a much better school. And of course, there is always the option of distance education or a public university.

    in reply to: French Special Forces are clowns #861712
    akuperma
    Participant

    The French did a pretty good job. Before the attack on the Jews, they thought they were dealing a right-wing racist. They have the guy captured with a good chance of getting him alive. The French claim they already thwarted an attack planned for today, and capturing him alive would give some indication whether he is a lone “nut job”, or whether the next attack might someplace else (such as Brooklyn).

    The French haven’t lost a war for 50 years, and have been very active in the war against Muslim fanatics, not only in Afghanistan, but in many countries in Africa where the USA doesn’t have the resources or skills to operate.

    in reply to: Why Is The World So Against Israel?? #861594
    akuperma
    Participant

    Our continued existence is a refutation of the core beliefs of Christiantiy and Islam. We were there. We are the only independent witnesses. And we say the New Testament and the Koran aren’t true by the very fact we refuse to convert.

    Other than Christians and Muslims, we get along fine with the goyim.

    in reply to: Why do we need animals? #861693
    akuperma
    Participant

    HaShem made them. Who are we to complain.

    But depending on the animal, some are useful friendly, or tasty.

    HaShem must have has a good reason for making mosquitoes and viruses, but that’s beyond me.

    in reply to: The Wizard of Oz #862039
    akuperma
    Participant

    Some would say it is actually about politics and economics during the turn of the century, though that was watered down in the movie.

    in reply to: scientific chometz ? #860390
    akuperma
    Participant

    I don’t think halacha would rely on such a definition, which would be a humrah. It would tend to pasul everything.

    in reply to: Who Invented The Internet? #860620
    akuperma
    Participant

    It was the American military to promote its own internal communications, and scientific research. Al Gore, then a Senator, along with the of the Congress voted to authorize the military to open it up to civilian use, though since it was used to communicate with civilian scientists it had been somewhat demilitarized already.

    THe World Wide Web was invented by some Swiss scientists looking for a better way to use the “internet”. Previously (and if you don’t use a graphic brower, even today), the internet was largely for text email and sending files (the ftp system).

    Arguably the origin of the internet was the telegraph invented in the early 19th century (which at the time caused complaints about its social impact not unlike those heard about the internet today, e.g. female telegraph operators “chatting” with male telegraph operators).

    in reply to: Hebrew Transliteration by the Secular and Modern #860380
    akuperma
    Participant

    The transliterations are not a function of religion or ideology but of language. Different letters have different sounds in each language. If the Roman script language you are used to is English, for example, the sound the ? makes is “sh” but if you are used to French that sound is “ch”. How to transcribe a ? also varies with different languages using c, k or q. What Indo-European (Aryan) speakers due to ? is highly problematic. The ? has been pronounced at various times as a “th”, a “s” and a “t” – and in fact some Jews use each, and to complicate matters,while the “th” sound is in English, it wasn’t in Latin, so there is no single letter for it in English.

    Linguistics is fsacinating, but it isn’t a function of frumkeit. A Hareidi Jews who is used to French, or one who was used to German (as was the case in Europe), and based their transliterated (romanized) spellings according, will write things differently than someone whose prefered goyish language is English.

    in reply to: Sickness of Gedolim #860232
    akuperma
    Participant

    Most Gedolim tend to be in poor health. That is because most Gedolim tend to be advanced in age, and human who are advanced in age tend to be in poor health, relative to younger people.

    An analogy. In the near future (based on life expectancy for someone her age), Queen Elizabeth will become ill and die. It is quite predictable (even if once upon a time it was considered treason to speculate about the monarch’s mortality). However her subjects will make a big thing out of being concerned and mourning her, not because it is shocking, but because that is part of respect.

    Everyone knows that almost all Gedolim are going to expire in the foreseeable future. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t make a big fuss. They are our royalty, and we should act appropriately.

    in reply to: Homoepathic & Naturapathic Medicine #860955
    akuperma
    Participant

    Nutrition has always been a part of conventional medicine, and “establishment” health care providers are trained in nutrition. However it appears that most doctors are cynical of patients willingness to consider it. Rather than tell a patient with Type-2 diabetes to undergo serious changes in diet and to get substantial amounts of exercise (since most patients would have done that already if they were so inclined), doctors prescribe medicines. If you tell your doctor you are nervous about drugs or surgeries and want to try changes in lifestyle, the doctor only needs to be convinced you are serious. By analogy, if a Ben Torah asks a shailoh of a Gadol,he’s quite likely to get, as an answer, a reference to the gemara or the Shulhan Arukh, since a Ben Torah really likes to know the real source of the answer to his problem. If a Baal ha-Bayis asks the question, he’ll get a “yes-no” answer since the Rav thinks him incapable of doing more. IF a doctor thinks you incapable of lifestyle changes, he’ll prescribe what he thinks you are capable of (having things done to you).

    All medicines are natural. Antibiotics started out as moldy bread. Apsirin is from tree bark. What “Big Pharm” does it find a way of making it more cheaply. What many alternate medicine people do is advocate drugs that have already been tested and been found wanting.

    in reply to: Homoepathic & Naturapathic Medicine #860941
    akuperma
    Participant

    Most of been thoroughly studied and found to be ineffective at best, and harmful at worst. Those that were found effective, are introduced into mainstream medicine (meaning regular companies find safe and cheap ways to produce them, patent the process, and charge accordingly).

    If you don’t want invasive procedures, just say so. If you have a private physician (as opposed to some place such as the army or a prison), they need your permission. They might say, “you know you might die if I don’t check for cancer or the like”, and you reply that you have great faith in Ha-Shem, and great feat of getting things stuck into you.

    in reply to: Divorced Girls Remarriage Prospects #860332
    akuperma
    Participant

    Among goyim, divorced people are more likely to get married than single people the same age who have never been married. I suspect that is the same among us. It would be interesting if someone figured out a way to do statistics.

    in reply to: IfIf a food is Kosher for Pesach for Ashkenazi and Sephardi.? #859357
    akuperma
    Participant

    No one, regardless of other issues, consider Quinoa to be a grain.

    Some argue it is analagous to corn (maize as its called elsewhere), meaning it would be kitniyot. Other argues it is similar halachically to potatoes, which everyone considers to be non-kitniyot. The definition of kitniyot is very vague, but basically kitniyout on non-grains that are sufficiently similar to grains that there might be confusion. The “new world” products, introduced to Europe in the 1500s, have no ancient tradition, but we’ve settled that corn is, and potatoes aren’t, even though both can be used to make a grain-like product. Quinoa were only introducted to us recently.

    in reply to: Alimony in Jewish Divorce Law #857929
    akuperma
    Participant

    In practice, the Beis Din always had discretion to do what is necessary based on the situation. Someone who says that such and such happened “always” or “automatically” is ignoring how a Beis Din works. They are dayanim (judges), not clerks.

    in reply to: Mamzer #892601
    akuperma
    Participant

    isaac1554:

    and she was really a frum woman who intended to be married “K’daas Moshe v’Yisrael”?????? if not, it would likely be held she was at most a pilegesh, and the issue of mamzerus is avoidable

Viewing 50 posts - 3,251 through 3,300 (of 3,439 total)