Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
akupermaParticipant
The public health people only gave “emergency” approval. While they found the vaccine safe and reasonably effective at reducing the chance of becoming seriously ill from Covid19, they would need much more time to determine if it prevent someone from spreading the disease. Working in favor of relaxed rules is that 90% of the people who get the disease don’t become seriously ill (the placebo vaccine would have been 90% effective, so when the talk about the effectiveness of the vaccine they are comparing it to the placebo and looking for how many people become seriously ill after getting the vaccine, as opposed to those who got the placebo).
akupermaParticipantand since most non-frum Jews intermarry as often as not, and have been doing so for about 200 years (depending on when their ancestor was OTD), if a non-frum “Jew” has a Jewish surname, it is reasonable to suspect that the person has non-Jewish ancestry on the maternal line
akupermaParticipantI wouldn’t attach much if any significance to CNN. They have long since given up on reporting news in favor of making up politically correct stories and catering to the “cancel culture” mob. The mere fact the one watches CNN for news suggests an inability to distinguish fiction from reality.
If anything he was fairly left-wing. His works show a strong opposition to anti-Semitism and racism, and he was unusually willing to include non-European looking people at a time when “all white” was the standard, and discussing racism and anti-Semitism was liable to get you blacklisted.
February 25, 2021 7:56 am at 7:56 am in reply to: DOES YWN MAKE MONEY FROM PROMOTING THE VACCINES?? #1952192akupermaParticipantIn the United States, approximate 1% (that’s roughly three million) people die every year. And the US death rate is lower than most economically advanced countries (not so much a function of health care as of higher fertility, since death rate is largely a function of age – that’s why Israel has a lower death rate than almost any advanced country).
Covid19 is little more than a “blip”. The US death rate, with Covid19 is still lower that many if not most countries before Covid19. And since overwhelmingly the fatalities are of people retired from work (press reporting of sensational exceptions not withstanding), there should not have been severe economic disruption except for serious government incompetence (blame Trump and Cuomo and all their colleagues – except for programs affecting senior citizens nothing should have been closed down and people should have been told not to panic).
February 24, 2021 2:44 pm at 2:44 pm in reply to: DOES YWN MAKE MONEY FROM PROMOTING THE VACCINES?? #1951919akupermaParticipantIn the above example, a person had a horrible cough but tested negative, but (adding my comments) it appears that due to the scare-mongering tactics the person (and/or friends and relations) freaked out believe he was dying. So instead of resting, drinking tea and chicken soup, and maybe getting a prescription cough medicine, he went to hospital taking up valuable resources and exposing himself to Covid19.
If this is the test before Maschiach comes, it seems that Ha-Shem has really given up on us and is dumbing down the test.
February 24, 2021 8:32 am at 8:32 am in reply to: DOES YWN MAKE MONEY FROM PROMOTING THE VACCINES?? #1951705akupermaParticipantIndirectly. YWN needs to avoid antagonizing most of the “frum” establishment, and they favor going along with the politically correct position that Covid19 is an existential threat to society, and the vaccines are critical for survival. Almost all of their advertisers would be forced to withdraw if YWN did otherwise. If you clash with the “party line”, you get cancelled.
The issue with credibility on Covid19 (especially among frum Jews since we are radically younger than the rest of society, plus our “older than boomers” age group are diminished due to holocaust) is that our personal experience doesn’t reflect the horrendous plagues in the past. This is true of many goyim as well. In past epidemics, most children lost multiple playmates. People of working age were dying so fast that the economy was undermined. In past epidemics, the death rate rose by many multiples (e.g. a smallpox epidemic is 16th century America killed over 50% of the population), whereas with Covid19 the death rate rose by about one-sixth, killing about one in a thousand, and numerous people had Covid19 or were quarantined without getting seriously ill.
Had those in charge not overstated the seriousness of Covid19, and relied on facts and science rather than scare mongering, there wouldn’t have been any issues (there also wouldn’t have been any school closings, any bans on davening, any closing “non-essential” business, and no recession). The real danger is if there ever is a serious public health threat, it won’t be taken seriously.
akupermaParticipantUniversal indoor plumbing (in the 19th century, few Yidden had it)
Antibiotics (a century ago, strep left you sick for months, and was often fatal)
Maternal and infant mortality are rare
Sefarim are cheaper, more available, and easier to read
Ability to walk down the street with a kippa and not get attacked (at least in the USA)
Hecksherim (Ingredient kosher is what people used to do in the past)
Most jobs (and almost all universities and career) are open to frum Jews (even if openly frum)
Genocide is considered illegal (even against us)
Antisemitism is disreputable (anyone saying something anti-Jewish has to explain he didn’t mean it)akupermaParticipantNassrallah, like many politicians, likes to let his mouth run. Since he doesn’t need to worry about what the local voters think, he is free to say anything that he wants. If he had some secret weapon or brilliant strategy, the last thing he would do is to announce it in advance.
akupermaParticipantRemember that while thermometers are a modern invention, there many ways of knowing the past history of climate (such as based on what crops grew where). The period of Bayis Sheini and the period of the Rishonim were warmer than today. The “Dark ages” (the decline of the western Roman Empire through the period of the Gaonim), and the period of the early Achronim until the 20th century, were cooler. In general, warm periods are good, and cool periods are bad. Warm means higher crop yields from a longer growing season, and cool periods mean people go hungry (e.g. the barbarian invasions of Europe, the European invasion of America -though both turned out very well for those doing the invasion).
So if the goyim’s theory climate change is correct and we are entering another warm area, that should be a good thing. Obviously there will be winner and losers (those who shovel snow for a living will be losers, those who mow grass will be winners). Less danger of freezing in the sukkah, , but the goyim might be grumpy at now getting snow for their winter holiday.
akupermaParticipant1. If the election was limited to in-person, verified (at least by signature) voters, there is a good chance that Trump would have won.
2. In states such as Georgia, where Republicans controlled the voting process, the data clearly indicates both that absentee voters were disproportionately Democratic (perhaps reflect a greater germ-phobia among Democrats), but suggest no one did any ballot box stuffing (since had that been the case, the Republicans would have lost badly in local races, and in fact they di rather well. This suggests that many Republicans chose not to vote for Trump.
3. The Republicans failed to effectively campaign for mail-in votes (similar to how the Democrats in 2016 ignored the “deplorables” )
February 17, 2021 3:00 pm at 3:00 pm in reply to: Biden Bringing in 11 Million Illegal Immigrants to Import More Democrat Votes #1949331akupermaParticipantGiven that a criminal is much worse off as an illegal immigrant (due to prejudice in any country against aliens, and the fact they can be deported even if found innocent), criminals generally prefer to follow their life of crime in their home country. By definition, a foreigner sticks out, and the last a criminal desires into stick out.
Trump shocked the Democrats by the respectable percentage of Hispanic votes he got. A Republican who sticks the core of Trump’s message, aimed for the working class (the “deplorables” in Democratic eyes), and avoids some of the off-color racist messaging that kept getting Trump in trouble, will undermine any Democratic advantage among new immigrants. It should also be noted that historically, it does not take very long for new immigrants to become nativists (and to start objecting to ever newer immigrants). Note by the way, that with a 19th century standard, Trump would be considered a new immigrant (1st and 2nd generation native to the USA, depending on parent).
akupermaParticipantThe Tulips played a major role in Netherlands going from being a major world power to a cute little neutral. It would be bad for Yidden if Bitcoin brings the end of America’s role as a great power.
akupermaParticipantJust like Tulips (which are much nice to look at)
akupermaParticipantMaybe they should stop using the courts to harass each other, so the courts and resolve real disputes in a timely manner. Adopting the English rule (loser pays the winner’s legal fees) for law suits by or for politicians would probably solve the manner.
akupermaParticipantujm: If you have a “more useful business”, then you should be able to go to the landlord of the property and offer him more money than the bank, since by definition your business will generate more profits.
If you feel than bank branches reflect an unwise business decision, you can purchase a “short” of the bank’s stock, since business that make unwise business decision will end up with lower profits and a lower stock price.
I suspect the banks feel that frum neighborhoods are good places to do business since they have vibrant small businesses and a young population (and small businesses and new families require the sorts of transactions one can’t do at an ATM machine, such as making loans), and where people are less comfortable transacting all business in an online environment. I note that none of the banks you mentioned as having branches have been in the news for being in danger of being closed down due to insolvency.
February 17, 2021 9:59 am at 9:59 am in reply to: Biden Bringing in 11 Million Illegal Immigrants to Import More Democrat Votes #1949107akupermaParticipantujm: but by the time immigrant children reach adulthood they are so assimilated that it doesn’t make any difference — if you are really concerned about socialist radicalization, work to close down the elite universities. Kids who become hard working stiffs will turn into “deplorables” whose votes are up for grabs
February 16, 2021 9:30 pm at 9:30 pm in reply to: Biden Bringing in 11 Million Illegal Immigrants to Import More Democrat Votes #1948980akupermaParticipant1 Many are children. Children can’t vote.
2. Many (if not most) of those are coming from socialist dominated regimes that they can’t stand. Based on most recent immigrants from those countries, they are hard workers who wish to keep the money they make and not turn it over to the government. While some people such as Trump who was openly anti-Hispanic (calling all Mexicans “rapists”) could scare them into being Democrats, many will end up as Republicans.
akupermaParticipantBanks will do what is profitable. If they think branches bring profits, that is what they do. Banks that do not make profits go out of business.
February 16, 2021 9:17 am at 9:17 am in reply to: Do Rep. actually have an impeachable case against K. Harris or it’s just air? #1948703akupermaParticipantIf you believe that constitutionally protected speech, that inspires someone to engage in illegal activity, absent the speaker encouraging illegal acts, is illegal, then Trump was guilty, Harris is guilty and a large number of politicians are guilty of all sorts of crimes. This sort of interpretation of “free speech” is unAmerican, but is common in many countries (albeit not ones we would consider “free”). The rule would then be that criticism of the state is prohibited since it might incite someone to no longer support the state (heh, if it was good enough for Uncle Joe and Adolph, it’s good enough for … ).
akupermaParticipantIn all fairness, in the 20th century (at least the first part), most Jews in the world relied on “ingredient kashrus”. They look at the label for known non-kosher ingredients. At first there were very few products with formal hecksherim, and even fewer where the item being sold has a kosher label. Even today, many people rely on ingredient kashrus rather than demanding a hecksher.
But now we can find almost anything with a formal hecksher, including most types of alcoholic beverages. And since food processing is much more complicated, labels are more unreliable than ever. So not insist on a hecksher?
Ingredient kashrus belongs to an area where Jews had to shave and try to look like goyim to keep jobs, even if it meant walking three hours to get home on Shabbos during the winter when work ended too late to use transit (and considered yourself fortunate to have a found a job that didn’t require working on Shabbos, since a six-day, 54 hour work week was the norm). It is from an era where wearing a yarmulke in public put you at risk of bodily harm, and precluded almost all possibilities of employment other than working for a frum owned business or a frum institution.
akupermaParticipantIf you accidentally killed a large number of people, you go around boasting about it???
akupermaParticipantIf the Sherry had a hecksher, it would not be an issue.
akupermaParticipantThe entire affair is a joke, and he is treating it with the respect it reserves. In an insurrection, one raises an armed force and seizes the government. One doesn’t prance around half naked with an animal skin and a wooden stick. Absent evidence showing Trump discussing use of armed force to seize the government, and also arranging with the significant garrisons stationed in or near Washington (one only a few blocks away) to cooperate, all that the Democrats have shown is that Trump, at worse, encouraged a lawful and constitutionally protected demonstration to get disorderly.
February 8, 2021 1:32 pm at 1:32 pm in reply to: Is there a middle class frum family financial crisis ? #1946268akupermaParticipantHaKatan: If housing prices are too high, move to a cheaper location or move to a smaller apartment. If tuition is too high (or rather the “discounts” offered are too low), move to a cheaper school. While it is nice that some frum Jews can afford upper crust areas such as Nassau County or New York City, that does happen to be among the most expensive places to live. Overall in America, there is a steady migration from high-cost areas to affordable areas.
Perhaps should you be asking if there is an upper class frum family financial crisis?
akupermaParticipantClever move by Biden. He denies the Iranians what they desperately want (relief from sanctions, which are destroying their economy), and gives them an irrelevant bone (the US will stop helping the Saudis from beating up the Iranian’s friends in Yemen, as if the Saudi’s really need our help).
February 8, 2021 11:37 am at 11:37 am in reply to: Is there a middle class frum family financial crisis ? #1946246akupermaParticipantThere always has been such a financial crisis, and there always will be. Just say Baruch ha-Shem. Having large families is for us a “feature” and not a “bug”. The law of supply and demand (cf: Adam Smith) will dictate that the level and expense of services offered (the supply) will fall so that it is in equilibrium of what families can afford (the demand), and this will a happen without any fancy committees doing anything.
Note that “middle class” is always a relative term – once it meant that everyone in the family had their own bed, the parents didn’t sleep in the same room as the children, and you had something other than potatoes to eat during the week.
akupermaParticipantIn the long run, no more significant than Yankees vs Mets, Orioles vs Nats, Cubs vs White Sox, Nets v Knicks, Jets v Giants, Rangers v Islanders, Ravens v ex-Redskins, etc.
The major difference is that professional athletes understand it’s only a game, whereas the politicians think they really do control the universe (hint: we know better).
akupermaParticipantYou are confusing Gog uMagog with the three stooges. Perhaps you are watching too much of the goyim’s media which have an absurd focus on “end of the world”. Relax and get back learning and davening and stop worrying so much.
akupermaParticipantIs there someone running around, tying you to a chair, forcing your eyes open, and making you spend your life looking at trash on the internet??????
Makes one think of someone who drinks too much and wonders why he is intoxicated, or someone who eats too much and can’t understand why he is overweight.
akupermaParticipantPeople have constantly complained that the “big” businesses are too powerful and undermine democracy and freedom. This should be put in historic context. Ask where the current all-powerful evil corporations were 50 years ago? Look at the list of the then all-powerful evil corporations of 50 years ago, and ask how important they are today? If the list from 50 years ago is the same as today (and all the more so, the same as 50 years before that), it would indicate the major corporations have dictatorial control over the country and society. If fact, the lists are significantly different. If people don’t like what a corporation is doing, they’ll take their business elsewhere, and soon that corporation will be looking for new leadership in hopes of rebuilding and reorganizing (or worse, looking for a bankruptcy lawyer).
akupermaParticipantAmazon is NOT the government. Private companies have a right to censor (e.g YWN has the right to exclude anti-semitic speech, even though the government does not).
Parler can take their business elsewhere. Amazon does not have a monopoly.
akupermaParticipantThe Democrats should be scared. In spite of alienating a large percentage of his own party (the only explanation of Trump’s negative tailcoats – the rest of the ticket did better than he did), Trump got a tremendous number of popular votes that Obama ever got, and missed winning by a tiny margin. If a Republican can keep Trump’s base (working class non-African Americans) while not alienatating the traditional Republican base (middle class, pro-business but not necessarily affluent), the Republicans will be able to trounce the Democrats nationally. Having alienating its traditional working class base, the Democrats are left with the limousine liberals and relying on “identity politics” to get Blacks, Hispanics and Asians to vote Democratic even though they would be better off under the Republicans.
akupermaParticipantDragging out confirmations is a waste of time (at least for people who the President can fire at any time). When the Senate is not controlled by the same party as the President, they constantly complain about each other. Any readers who work with preschoolers will notice the similarities between politicians and preschoolers.
January 26, 2021 1:51 pm at 1:51 pm in reply to: United States – No Unity after an Insurrection #1942702akupermaParticipantA guy running around half naked with an animal skin, and no weapons, is NOT an insurrection. If you were planning an insurrection, you would arrive well armed (including artillery and air support), and in advance would have arranged with the local garrisons to mutiny. Confusing trespassing, disorderly conduct and vandalism with treason marks one as a fool. Using your foolish to support banning all expressions of dissent directed against the state marks you as a fascist.
The attacks on government buildings in the Pacific Northwest are closer to “insurrection” except they seem more aimed at disruption the seizure of power.
January 26, 2021 11:09 am at 11:09 am in reply to: Supreme Court Dismisses Case Creating a Laughter #1942653akupermaParticipantThe case is moot. If the Democrats has been able to show that Trump was on the payroll of a foreign government, that would have been an impeachable offense. If the Democrats showed Trump was simply running a business, the Democrats would look silly since it is clear that presidents are allowed to moonlight (and many of the early presidents spent much time on their business interests including selling things to foreigners).
Of course, if you believe, as Trump does, that Trump really won the election, the case wouldn’t be moot since Trump is still president. The Supreme Court clearly feels otherwise.
akupermaParticipantIf the election was stolen, there would have been a “Blue wave”. The Democrats have been stuffing ballot boxes for two centuries, and never once did they ever split their tickets. The results show that many Republicans did not vote for Trump (and if you use Reagan as the model of a modern Republican, Trump is a populist RINO, which would explain this year’s results). Trump also borrowed from Hilary’s game plan and focused an his base rather than trying to expand his base and win the election.
akupermaParticipantThe same way it was clear when Democrats stole elections in the past (consider Daley in Chicago, or Tammany Hall in New York). You would audit the list of who voted and see errors, You would see widely different results in places where Democrats count the votes and Republicans do. There would be inconsistencies.
Note that in Georgia, a state under Republican control, the audits showed no errors. What the results throughout the country showed is that many core Republicans (affluent, business-oriented, often suburban and in no way deplorable) supported the ticket (the Republicans won most Senate races, gained in the House and did well in the state legislatures) BUT DID NOT SUPPORT TRUMP. This suggests Trump lost not due to fraud, but because he ignored a major part of his base,akupermaParticipantIf you read left wing media (BTW, in “Social media” that may soon be the only type), Donald J. Trump is a cross between the Satan and Hitler, who if he has a chance will either destroy the country or the world, and is of course the source of all evil in society (disease, bad weather, excessive wealth if you are rich, poverty if you are poor, etc).
On the other hand, a third of the country, who don’t read the politically correct truth media, people often called “Deplorables”, believe Trump saved the nation and the world, and is their only hope for a better life and full civil rights and a “place at the table”, and also believe Trump was cheated in the last election by use of irregular and easy to fake mail ballots. And these people won’t go away.
akupermaParticipantA coup of people none of whom were heavily armed, and almost all of whom had no weapons, storming the Capitol whose police have assault rifles and body armor, and can call for backup for several nearby military garrisons. They sound less like a putsch than something similar to the “children’s crusade”.
P.S. The Capitol Police, who are not under Trump’s control, apparently bought into the politically correct idea that heavily armed militarized police increase the level of violence at a riot. The old fashioned, politically incorrect view, is that once a demonstration turns violent, the police need to crush it with maximum force. Unfortunately, the Congress in many of its internal policies tends towards political correctness.
akupermaParticipant1. It would destroy Pence’s political career, since he is probably the front-runner to replace Biden in 2024.
2. Accepting a pardon is an admission of guilt.
3. It wouldn’t protect Trump from factitious charges in states courts pertaining to any economic interests and given the apparently censorship of politically incorrect news (and the control the major internet companies exercise), Trump is at a major disadvantage
4. Politically the smartest thing Biden could do would be to order the Justice Department to refrain from any political prosecutions (allowed, since Common law prosecutors always have the discretion not to proceed).
5. Especially given the media monopoly on the left, as well as the “cancel culture”, is that the Trump base will increasingly regard the government as other than democratic and not governed by rule of law. A Biden pardon would totally change the climate politically, though that is unlikely.
akupermaParticipantWSJ represents that economic establishment, and Trump has been deemed bad for business.
One should note that if he resigned immediately, Pence will get the presidential pay and pension rights for the next 10 days, and unlike Trump, or Biden, Pence could use the money.
akupermaParticipantDemocracies can be wild, especially one that has a very broad range of peoples, ideologies, etc.
For peace and quiet, try someplace with no diversity of people, cultures or ideas, or even better, try a dictatorship in a country with no diversity of anything (North Korea is a good example – no riots, law and order, very quiet and orderly).
You will know the USA is in trouble when American refugee camps are for those trying to leave the USA, not those try to get in.
akupermaParticipantSince the vaccine was rushed without proper testing, there is no reason to believe one theory over another. Allowing politicians to decide based on focus groups and social media is at basically letting a random selection replace anything that can pass for science. Trump might be right, Biden might be right, they might both be wrong, and there is little chance either has the foggiest idea of the science involved, especially since no one had the time to do the necessary research.
akupermaParticipantcommon saychel: Depending on seminary, Hebrew is not a required subject. Almost all Americans are very much monolingual and tend to look down on learning foreign languages. And frequently, make fools of themselves (e.g when General Motors markets a car in Latin America with the name “Nova”).
akupermaParticipantNo one ever can the Democrats (or modern Americans, in general) credit for knowing foreign languages. Only someone hopelessly monolingual could get so confused by a false cognate (thinking that “amen” really is “a man”). But then again, most Americans (red and blue) are hopelessly monolingual. In our community almost everyone is bilingual or trilingual or even quadralingual (English, Hebrew, Yiddish and Aramaic), but that is highly unusual in the United States.
Since they believe that “Manhattan” means “Man hat on”, will they change the name of the boro (and island) to “Femhatton”???
akupermaParticipantThe Constitution clearly makes it the resonsibiity of each state to decide how it chooses electors. In fact, it is a minhag to have a direct election – at one time state legislatures chose them.
If a new president, isn’t chosen by noon on Jan. 20, the next person is line would be the Speaker of the House, who is Nancy Pelosi.
Even the most militant pro-Trump fanatics prefer Joe Biden to Nancy Pelosi.
akupermaParticipantInmates running the asylum. What do you expect? This is Olam ha-Zeh, where of course the inmates run the asylum. No Hiddish here.
akupermaParticipantCrimes require “mens rea” (kavanah). “Innocent until proven guilty” is well rooted in common law and applies to all criminal matters. They could make it a crime to deliberately infect someone, which would cover deliberately getting an infection (though criminal statutes against self-harm are dubious, note that if someone commits suicide they are no longer hung up on a gallows).
To end the pandemic, only count someone as having Covid19 if they have symptoms more serious than flu or a cold or allergies (they did this when testing the vaccine). The number of positive cases would become very small since 90% of cases don’t result in illness. Announce the vaccine works (in tests, the placebo was 99% effective, the real vaccine was 99.9% effective), and allow everything to reopen. Seriously encourage old and sickly people to stay home, and wear N95 masks if they venture outside. In other words, declare victory and get back to normal.
akupermaParticipantDonald Trump gave American politics a much needed shaking up, gave hope to those seen as a “basket of deplorables” by the dominant elite class, and managed to undermine himself by speaking and twittering before thinking.
akupermaParticipantDon’t worry. There are plenty of other politically incorrect for them to target. Lack of substance will never be a problem for those to whom facts are less significant than conformity to self-imposed ideological norms.
-
AuthorPosts