smerel

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 663 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: fandango, can we get a full interview, please? #2420251
    smerel
    Participant

    Why would anyone want to hear more bitter emotionally laced posts from troll?

    in reply to: President Donald Trump the Magnificent! #2419814
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>The “lucky”. His “wins” are due to having stupid opponents that Trump can maneuver into making fools of themselves.

    I’m not a major Trump fan but there is just a limit to how little credit you can give someone by blaming their opponents incompetence. Had a guy like John
    McCain or Mitt Romney became president and their political heir would be heading the Republican party none of what Trump accomplished would have happened. That is aside for the fact that had Kamala Harris been running against another John McCain or Mitt Romney she very likely would have won the election. What did they ever think of doing that didn’t boil down to Democratic party-lite?

    in reply to: MAGA Support For Israel is Dead #2418711
    smerel
    Participant

    Simple Question: Can anyone make an intelligent argument that Israel would have been better off during the Iran war had it been during the Iran had Harris and Waltz been in the white house? What is it?

    Even from the Republican side, say McCain, or Romney would have won the presidency and it would be their types leading the Republican party. Does anyone think they would have bombed Iran’s Fordow nuclear facility?

    in reply to: Rental prices #2418708
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>I’ll try to remember that principle when negotiating the purchase of a $500 Calabrian esrog or $50/lb box of hand-made shmurah matzoh.

    No comparison to rental prices. If you can’t afford it you can easily do without a $500 esrog (or not buy an esrog altogether and just borrow one) or $50/lb box of hand-made shmurah matzoh (or ask for Kimcha D’Pischa. The Gemara says that Arba Kosos etc. in an exception to the rule of
    עֲשֵׂה שַׁבַּתְּךָ חוֹל וְאַל
    תִּצְטָרֵךְ לַבְּרִיּוֹת)
    . When someone is living in an apartment with raising rents they do not always have the easy option to just move

    in reply to: 1776-2025: NYC, End of an Era #2418235
    smerel
    Participant

    NYC has been on the decline since the 1960s. There were some bumps and better times but the trajectory started then. Once the government focuses on social issues rather than the quality of life hard times are ahead. NYC is an exception to most big cities in that (1)it sometimes elected level headed officials and (2)it needs state permission to do a lot of things. Which prevented it from doing many stupid ones. But the way things are now NYC will soon be another Philadelphia, just bigger

    in reply to: Neturei Karta Condemned by Jews on Youtube #2418223
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>Just the opposite. Many gentiles have nothing against Jews and our religion, Judaism.

    So now the NK has done away with “Esav Soney L’Yaakov” too. (They used to claim it only applies to the descendants of Esav) Of course the NK are not the first to do this. Most very assimilated anti-Frum groups believe that too. Most Mosrim who collaborated with those looking to kill Jews used the NK logic of by showing them that I/we the “good Jews” they won’t have issue with or bother me/us.

    But that is where the comparison stops. Even the Mosrim and collaborators with those looking to kill Jews over the generations generally did not attend and speak at their anti-semitic rallies in an effort to lend support and fire up the crowd about the correctness of their cause. That level of Rishus is unique to the Neturei Karta

    in reply to: Neturei Karta Condemned by Jews on Youtube #2416336
    smerel
    Participant

    Whatever your view on Zionism is the NK are not a frum group. They are a Palestinian Nationalist group. And not just an a Palestinian Nationalist group , rather they always gravitate and advocate for whichever Palestinian Nationalist group is the most bloodthirsty and sadistic at the current time. They use their long beards and peyos to give a hechesr and haskama on people who in the non-Jewish world are looked at sadistic mass murderers. Not only that alredy in the 1930s Rav Chaim Ozer Grodzenski said about them and their ilk that for a Torah perspective they are less no guilty of the Shalosh Shevous and Hisgays B’Umoas than the ecther Zionists. Kal V’Chomr today when they are little more than a sadistic Palestinian Nationalist group

    in reply to: MAGA Support For Israel is Dead #2416153
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>If it did benefit, it is not to Trump’s credit. etc.

    Wow. This takes being anti-Trump to a whole new level .Even when you think Trump did the right thig you still can not give him credit and say “I thank Hashem for putting the wrong idea in Trump’s head to benefit us,” Next time you wonder why people so blindly follow Trump realize that you have the same mindset. Only you are on the other side. Trump supporters can also brush off anything he did wrong by saying “Hashem put the wrong idea in his head” too

    in reply to: MAGA Support For Israel is Dead #2415450
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>I would point out that one of the scariest people who likes these Fringe isolationist and anti-semites is none other than Vance.

    JD Vance does have isolationist views. They include things like criticizing Biden and co a June 2024 speech for not allowing Israel to fight Hamas without U.S. micromanagement. He opposes the US spending enormous amounts of money on foreign aid . He still co-signed a letter urging replenishment of Israel’s Iron Dome funding.

    During the vice-presidential debate, he sid that Israel’s decision to launch a preemptive strike on Iran is “up to Israel” to ensure its safety, and the U.S. should support its allies “when they’re fighting the bad guys.”

    It is important not to attack these type of people as being “anti-Israel” or “dangerous” for an across the board leaning towards isolationist views because such talk can create a self fulfilling prophecy.

    For more perspective compare JD Vance = to his opponent, Tim Waltz, who said that the U.S. lacks neutrality to mediate peace between Israel and Iran, and that China might have the “moral authority” to broker an agreement.

    in reply to: Rabbi Chaim Kanievsky and the modern State of Israel #2415369
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>In (very) short, that means that if goyim – chas v’shulem – threaten masses of jews, our kosher responses are: make peace, give gifts, run away, and pray to G-d. What we are not allowed to do is organize an army and physically fight the enemy.

    The Ramban in the beginning of the V’Yislach that says (32:4) says it differently. He says by prayer, by giving him a present, and by rescue by methods of WARFARE, and to flee and to be saved. Your haskafa disagree with the Ramban on this. I’ll go with the Ramban.

    What about the halachas in Gemora and Shulchan Orech of Akum S’Tzero al Aiyoros ? That also doesn’t fit into your haskafa?

    in reply to: MAGA Support For Israel is Dead #2414910
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>Tucker Carlson, Charlie Kirk, Joe Rogan, Steve Banon and all are now some of the loudest anti-Israel voices.

    Opposing the US getting involved in a war does not equal being the loudest anti-Israel voices. You would be hard pressed to find a person of influence in the US today who is more pro Israel than Charlie Kirk. Including strong support for Israel attacking Iran. There is nothing inherently anti-Israel about his view that the war does not involve the US so it should not get involved . Some of the other names are anti semites in any case. Their opposition to the US involvement in the war is not necessarily a symptom of that. The long term Israeli view has also been not to involve US foot soldiers in their wars and not to allow US peacekeepers on its borders. Reason being that all it would take is a few American solders killed for the entire US to turn anti Israel

    in reply to: כחי ועצם ידי #2413295
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>wtsp: so since we have to give thanks to Hashem for the victories that He gave to the Israeli army, are you in favor of saying Hallel on Yom Ha’atzmaut and Yom Yerushalaim, as many religious Zionists do?

    The question wasn’t asked to me but since it wasn’t answered I will. Saying Hallel needs specific conditions for it to be said. The religous Zionists beleive that those conditions were met on those days. Most other frum people do not. Thanking Hashem when the conditions for saying Hallel have not been met is something that should be every day. Or at least when one sees his hasgacha.

    I don’t want to post further on this thread because it does not bring out good in people to continue on these type of “they are so terrible-we hate them” type of threads. I will say that it is going backwards. If the starting point was when do we thank Hashem, did Chazal ever praise Resoyim for their military valor on behalf of Klall Yisroel in a war they should not have gotten involved in (the answer to that is yes) and then applying it to the current situation (whatever your view on Zionism is) things would be more clear.

    in reply to: Joint Siyum #2407925
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>At the same time, this was clearly a partisan event. No Talmidei Chachamim from other shitot were speaking

    Not really true. Rabbi Yisroel Meir Lau spoke at the Siyum Hashas before that one. As did others who did not share Aguda haskafa

    >>>Maybe if those who agree with the idea of having a joint siyum with Talmidei Chachamim speakers from several shitot (from YU, for example – R Schachter, R Willig, R Lebovitz, maybe also Chabad, Israeli groups…)

    Firstly If R Schachter, R Willig, or R Lebovitz would be asked we all know that it would be spun as tacit endorsement of YU haskafa. The Siyum Hashas certainly does not need to turned into a controversial event. They do sit on the dais so it’s not like they are excluded from the event. Secondly when those three speak it is usually to a smaller crowd than then when those who speak at the Siyum Hashas do. So in terms of bringing attendees the ones who do speak are simply better choices. As far as Chabad goes putting everything else about Chabad aside why on Earth would they ask a representative of a group that does not learn Daf Yomi, let alone promote it, to speak?

    Does it bother you why they don’t ask anyone from Satmar to speak or is that something you understand? (Satmar opposes Daf Yomi being a mass daily Limmud )

    in reply to: Jewish critics of the State of Israel, where do they reside? #2406878
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>for your made up speculative “concern” you decided there is a toeles to motzi shem ra on the beis of Jerusalem, headed by the litvish Gadol Rav Moshe Shternbuch shlit”a?

    Um.. The point of the V’Yoel Moshe about the Aguda seems to have gone completely over your head. There is a major difference between a reference to the Badatz in the context of it’s function as a Beis Din and the Badatz in it’s function as a political group hanging up paskevilin and calling for demonstrations . The former is a respected group. The latter is just a bunch of baaley batim. As the V’Yoel Moshe says in reference to the Aguda the problem with these type of groups is that the Baaley Batim end up taking over. Rarely is that observation as true as it is about the Satmar affiliated Edah Hachredis.

    I will not respond further on this topic

    in reply to: Jewish critics of the State of Israel, where do they reside? #2406652
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>what does your lushen hureh have to do with the statements of the Satmar Rebbe in Vayoel Moshe?

    The Satmar Rebbe in Vayoel Moshe criticizes Agudah for being headed by laymen. As such it behooves all of his followers to take a good look at the Edah HaChariedis and the amount of power laymen have in that organization. At least when the Moetzes of Aguda puts out a statement you know that most of them actually support it. When a statement is put out in the name of the rabbinical leadership of the Edah HaChariedis it is frequently flat out Daas Baaley Batim using their names without their prior knowledge.

    in reply to: Jewish critics of the State of Israel, where do they reside? #2406350
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>To be clear (if you care to understand anything being discussed here), the leadership of Agudas Yisroel is emphatically a lay leadership with loose ties to the “moetzes”…

    You would be hard pressed to find an organization more controlled by laymen than the Satmar affiliated Edah HaChariedis . The lay people in Agudah do not put out Kol Koreys in the name of the moetzes without their knowledge. The Edah HaChareidis does so on a weekly basis. It is alleged that Rav Yisroel Yaakov Fisher the Raavad of the Edah HaChareidis used to say that he reads the pashkevilin on his way home from Mincha to find out what he signed on last night…

    in reply to: The Peaceful Dismantlement of the State of “Israel” #2405353
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>The Brisker Rov, The Chofetz Chaim ect. agreed with this psak

    Please try to nominally verify facts before repeating them. Or at least determine if they were even possible. The Brisker Rav who was niftar in 1959 most certainly did not express agreement for V’yoel Moshe that was published in 1961. Let alone the CC who probably barely if at all even know who the Satmar Rebbe was.

    The Brisker Rav was opposed to the some of the Satmar haskafa about Zionism. Particularly the confrontational approach they took and their attributing the state of Israel to the Sotton

    in reply to: Jewish critics of the State of Israel, where do they reside? #2404831
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>In fact, the Chazon Ish himself didn’t think the Zionist “State” would last more than 50 years at most

    Wow. It’s been many years since I last heard anyone make that claim. (The claim used to be 40 years) Nowadays most people deny it and point out that there was never any actual verifiable source who claimed to have heard that from him . Those who knew him deny it being the type of thing he would have said. There a simple reason even anti-Zionists no longer claim the CI said it. Had the Chazon Ish really made such an off target prediction it would call his general assessment about the state of Israel into question.

    If anything the Chazon Ish said that “Zionism” as the movement was in his time will not last more than 40 years into the state’s existence. There is no evidence that he said that either but at least it is true that in the late 1980s and certainly the late 1990s people were already saying that the Zionist movement of Mapam, Mapai, Makki, Herut etc no longer exists . When was the last time anyone heard from Hashomer Hatzeir? etc.

    smerel
    Participant

    Rav Ovadia Yosef has a teshuva about saying Kol Moley Rachmim for Druze soldiers who were killed fighting in the Israeli army calling them kedoshim. He says the correct thing to do is to say it. For those who did not see the teshuva and can not bring alternate maare mokomos please spare me your boich svoras on the topic

    in reply to: Chaim Weiss case #2402825
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>Even the FBI got involved and made a psychological profile of the killer who they said is “someone who knew him well”

    So what? Had the FBI actually cracked the case going with that assumption that would be something. Being that in the world of reality they assigned over 25 detectives to the case, closed the entire dormitory where it took place for over a year (Which according to the them was both the crime scene and the residence of the murderer) repeatedly interviewed the murderer , (according to their belief of who it was)repeatedly reopened the case and still couldn’t come up with a single after the fact clue, I’m not impressed in the slightest with a theory of theirs. Neither should you , if you believe they are such total incompetents that despite all the evidence they had, they still couldn’t narrow it down between less than 150 people who they had easy access to and spoke to repeatedly. Yes, I know they claim no one wanted to talk. If people talked freely to the police, you wouldn’t need detectives to begin with. Their job is to get info from people who don’t cooperate. Not people who do. No one was charged with obstruction of justice (hampering an investigation ) But the police “know” that there is a coverup.

    in reply to: Chaim Weiss case #2402811
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>It’s going to be shoved in your face every now and then until it’s solved and there’s nothing you can do about it.

    Are you threating me here? I tried to stop anyone from discussing it? I asked a question of why it is being mentioned out of the blue (by someone who just started a new account) . Is my suspicion that you just read some online forum trying to convince you , or at least heavily biased in the direction, that someone inside the Yeshiva did it correct? Yes or no?

    From my perspective, the reason the online world loves claiming and then rehashing the claim it was done by someone in the Yeshiva is because the online world loves blood libels against frum people. Even better if it against a Yeshiva. Here is a great chance to perpetuate one.

    in reply to: Chaim Weiss case #2402564
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>I heard that from people that were in yeshiva at the time. Some even say they know who it was.

    If they KNOW who it was why don’t they say so to people other than anonymous online posters? And don’t give me this coverup excuse. No one engaged in a coverup in such a high profile case is telling people who would broadcast it online that they are complicit in it. Why don’t you try to convince them to talk? Did a Rav tell you that you can’t help get a murderer handed over to the police? Which one?

    in reply to: Chaim Weiss case #2401970
    smerel
    Participant

    Maybe had the police and co not done the investigation with such a heavy bias that it was someone in the Yeshiva who did it they would have found the actual murderer. I remember when it happened and I know many people who were learning in Long Beach at the time. Not a single one of them believes that had it been someone affiliated with the Yeshiva he could have avoided arrest by now. The amount of effort the police made to find him was just too much to avoid even a suspicion. They also all say that the online discussions of the story all heavily bend the truth and details in order to point suspicion at someone in the Yeshiva.

    Why the new interest now? Were there any new developments or did you just read some online forum trying to convince you it was someone in the Yeshiva?

    in reply to: Rabbi Yaakov Kamenetsky and the modern State of Israel #2401817
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>The CIA shows it plainly on their website that they told the propagandizing Zionists that the war would take about a week and that the Zionists would wipe the floor with the Arabs.

    Not true. The CIA never said that . I checked their website They did believe that Israel would win the war but nothing about a week and so little cost of life. And the CIA also promised Israel that it is their unanimous consensus that the Yom Kippur War will NOT happen. And the CIA at that very same time sent almost 60,000 Americans to their death in Vietnam saying that the US would win the war.

    For the militant atheists yes the CIA prediction prove in the words of Yitchak Rabin “Anyone who thinks we won the six day war because God came to our aid is mistaken. It was all our superior strength and planning” Yes, Satmar strongly endorses and promotes the viewpoint of Yitzchok Rabin and co. Any independent analysis of the situation would indicate otherwise.

    in reply to: Rabbi Yaakov Kamenetsky and the modern State of Israel #2401055
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>The Satmar Rebbe’s book on the Israeli victory in 1967 (Al HaGeulah VeAl HaTemurah) says the win was since the Arabs were not very good soldiers.

    The militantly atheistic anti religious Jews say the exact same thing. I’ve yet to see anyone try to provide an independent analysis proving this was true.

    When one side (Israel) is outnumbered between 3 to 9 in everything , soldiers, weapons, planes, etc and is facing a muti national coalition tht is attacking them all sides they don’t usually win the war in a mere six days. If they win at all. Even if their soldiers are better.

    Furthermore if you believe that Israel won the six day war so quickly despite being so outnumbered because they were better fighters, then you should also believe the Zionist argument that had we been around during the holocaust we would have prevented it . Because we know how to fight.

    in reply to: The Peaceful Dismantlement of the State of “Israel” #2398247
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>The Brisker Rav noted that the “State” the Zionists have achieved is the “greatest triumph of the satan since the sin of the golden calf” –

    This is SHEKER GAMUR and a tremendous disgrace to the Brisker Rav and Torah true Judaism.

    Firstly whatever your view on Zionism is there is no way anyone can argue that they are worse than Yeruvem ben Nevat who made actual real egels and forced the majorty of Klal Yisroel to worship them. They aren’t worse than Menashe who burnt every single sefer torah in all of Eretz Yisroel (according to most opinions) and turned the Beis Hamakdush itself into a place of idol worship. They aren’t worse than the Yesvekitzia who successfully helped in the shmad of the three million people Jewish community in Russia. (The Yesvekitzia also persecuted Zionists with the same zeal as they persecuted frum people)

    Secondly the Brisker Rav was of the opinion that the anti-Zionist belief that attributes the state of Israel and all of its succusses to the Sotton borders of Kefira. It elevates the Sotton to having power of a deity R”L. It is not so different (if at all) from them non-Jewish idolatrous view that all evil in the world exists because of the Satan. The Sotton does not “triumph” R’L . He does what Hashem gives him power to do

    in reply to: The Peaceful Dismantlement of the State of “Israel” #2395446
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>Can someone please provide us with an exact source for this statement?

    See the end of the second volume of Kisvei Rav Yosef Elya Henkin where he discusses haskafa issues and some of his articles in Torah journals in the early 1950s where he strongly, strongly writes against the behavior and secondary haskafas of the anti-Zionist kanoim.

    in reply to: The Peaceful Dismantlement of the State of “Israel” #2395054
    smerel
    Participant

    Rav Yosef Elya Henkin was the very few Gedoley Torah from out of the Satmar orbit to have opposed voting in the Knesset elections so he was no Zionist. Unlike the troll question asked here and most of the anti-Zionist answers given here he was truly not a Zionist. But as Rav Yosef Elya Henkin wrote in the name of Rav Ozer Grodzenki, most of the anti-Zionist kanoim are no better than the Zionists themselves when it comes to the Gimmel Shavous and hsigarus b’umos. They happen to have a different vision than Herzl but they also want to control and conquer the state of Israel and install a government of their liking in the name of Judaism. What makes them different than Ben Gurion? There is also the Jabotinsky wing of Zionism, and the Kanoim wing of Zionism. Perhaps the kanoim are more aggressive, standoffish, confrontational and have been far more successful in turning people away from authentic Judaism over the past few decades. than the other wings of Zionism. But they all share the same goal. Control of Israel and installing a government of their liking while claiming to speak in the name of Judaism.

    in reply to: Where is Hashem? #2394415
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>smerel- uh no, the antisemites cant touch us if hashem doesnt want them to (source: the thirteen ikarim of the rambam)

    Um…Where in the thirteen ikarim of the rambam does it say that Hashem took away the bechira of the anti-semites today?

    There is a machlokes in the Rishonim whether a rasha would still have the bechira to kill a Tzadik who took all safety precautions and did not have in his mazal to die at a certain point but we will leave that aside. Where in the thirteen ikarim of the rambam does it say that Hashem took away the bechira of the anti-semites TODAY?

    in reply to: Where is Hashem? #2392948
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>We are told that there is more Torah being learned, more tzedaka being given and more chesed being done today than at any time in Jewish history.

    Firstly who told you that? Secondly even if true, since the first Beis Hamakidash there was no probably no time in Jewish history that had the favorable external circumstances allowing for Torah being learned and tzedaka being given. (I’ve never heard anyone make that claim about chesed) Thirdly antisemites have bechira even today

    in reply to: Where’d the ‘ל come from? #2392542
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>How did Yakov become Yankev

    That one is easy. In many countries the letter AYIN was pronounced as an ANG sound . The word Shemah would be pronounced Shmang but with very little emphasis on the G. Therefore the name Yaakov would always have been pronounced as Yankov by them. (Actually Yankgev but with so little emphasis on hte g that it sounded like Yankev)

    Even today in Amsterdam children are still taught that an AIYN in ang, Briskers repeat the words in Shema with an AIYN to also make that sound in case it is correct and some of the old time Yekke shuls still insist that whoever davens for the amud pronounces “Elokei Yangkov”.

    in reply to: Holocaust Survivors #2392035
    smerel
    Participant

    I knew someone who was a twelve year old in a safe house under the protection of Wallenberg during the holocaust . He for his part was obsessed with the holocaust and his experiences. None of the Polish survivors I knew, who all went through so much more and worse were obsessed like that.

    Anyway, there are different levels of being a holocaust survivor . The secular definition is anyone who went through Nazi persecution. Someone who was a child in Germany and left with his family in 1936 because of the way they winds were blowing is considered a holocaust survivor just like someone who went through six years of torture in Poland. There is an ulterior motive behind why the secular world stretches the definition so much. That way the holocaust is barley unique.

    I think it depends on what someone went through. Even being in a safe house was terrible . But being someone who is worthy of giving brochas on par with a Gadol B’Yisroel because they went through the holocaust and remained frum is something I would only say about someone who was in actual concentration camps. Or an extended period in a ghetto. Or years of hiding in a forest . Etc.

    in reply to: WZO elections 2025 #2385455
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>Chesky, if we trust your testimony, then what are we to of R Landau’s position that R Chaim did not hear the right question (or of posters who say that video is AI-produced?). Was now he mislead?

    If you’re going with that logic (1) You are in general calling everything RCK said into question (2) why stop by him? The anti-WZO voting crowd loves quoting alleged comments of Gedolim who are dead for100 years with very little evidence they actually said those things. But even if they did (I assume they did) why not just say they were also fed misinformation and didn’t understand the situation?

    in reply to: How Trump can become problematic #2371556
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>1. By cooperating with Russia to end the war on terms favorable to Russia, Trump sends the message that the USA does not keep its commitments

    The US never made any commitments the Russia- Ukraine conflict . Trump’s policy and view about the Russia-Ukraine conflict has been pretty consistent since he took public office.

    >>>Civil Service, at least for the last 60 years, has been a leading source of employment for frum Jews.

    Are you joking or do you mean that 60 years ago civil service was a leading source of employment for frum Jews? A white frum man wearing a yarmulka has about a zero percent chance of getting a civil job unless he has some connections pulling strings for him.

    >>> Some of Trumps policies are likely to backfire and increase the chance of a Democratic president with control of Congress by 2029, and perhaps one in which the “Progressive” (WOKE) caucus is dominant.

    No matter what Trump does the Democrats have a very high chance of retaking the white house and congress in 2029. The Republicans best bet at keeping it is if the Democrats put up woke candidates

    in reply to: The antizionism amongst religious Jews has no legitimate detractors #2370344
    smerel
    Participant

    I’m not going to argue about Zionism itself. Anti-Zionists rarely define what that is anyway. And when they do they never define it the same way those who consider themselves t be Zionists do. I will say this however. There was a time in my life that I had a Friday seder in V’Yoel Moshe. I read more than my share of anti-Zionists literature. Even assuming V’Yoel Moshe was the ultimate Torah authority on this issue. Even assuming the anti-Zionist version of history was true (I believe neither of those) Extreme anti-Zionism today is a movement. Not just an haskafa. And that movement has a lot of poison in it and destroyed many of its followers. And it’s followers are frequently the aggressors, not the victims when it comes to dealing with “Zionists” And that movement has a lot of fault for the CURRENT hostility to the frum world in EY. And that movement has NEVER accomplished anything in bringing people closer to Hashem and Torah. Etc.etc.etc. That is why I’m so disillusioned from that movement

    in reply to: Derech halimud for high school bochurim #2370031
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>I think one of the main problems is a lack (or a refusal) of Charedim to understand the other side. To have genuine empathy. To be nosei be’ol chavero.

    One of the main problems in Israel in general is that NO ONE seems to understand or have any empathy for the other side. The stakes are so high and passions are so strong for anyone that everyone seems to have a siege mentality. And in reality they in fact are all correct. Every group in Israel would be adversely affected if ” they” have their way or gets to be too much of a majority

    in reply to: Sharing the burden of Torah #2342753
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>(AKuperma) If all the Zionists wanted was to Jews being able to live in peace and devote themselves to Torah and Mitsvos, they had that option a century ago, and turned it down.

    They did??? They turned it down??? In the anti-Zionist education that I received growing up of course they never acknowledged that at the time Zionism was taking root, Jews were in a horrible situation with no apparent solution so the idea of having your own country made a lot of sense and had a lot of appeal but this takes the anti-Zionist revisionist history to a whole new level. Say you are were a Jew in Russian 100 years ago during the time of rampant pogroms AND a government looking to (and was ultimately successful at ) uproot(ing) Torah to a degree that makes the Zionists seem like absolute Tzadikim where was your opportunity to live in peace and devote themselves to Torah and Mitsvos? Say you were in neighboring Poland with many laws discriminating against Jews, little police protection, major government interference into Chadorim etc. where was your opportunity to live in peace and devote themselves to Torah and Mitsvos? Maybe at the time it was true in neighboring Germany at the time. We know how that ended up…. The US did not allow immigration at the time and most of the Gedolim who opposed Zionism opposed immigrating to the US too…

    in reply to: Arrogance: to be pitied or abhorred? #2342094
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>I am confused, because I recently read an article written by a psychologist

    Without directly addressing the question, I sure hope you don’t get confused every time you see some article from some psychologist claiming something you didn’t think was the case before. To answer the question in a peripheral way, think of all the people who you believe hurt you in your life. Do you view ALL of them as nebach because plenty of psychologists will tell you that “hurting people hurt other people”?

    in reply to: Origins of Muslim Anti-Semitism #2339643
    smerel
    Participant

    The common anti-Zionist argument of the Arab world was better than the Christian world so therefore the state of Israel must be the cause of the current animosity to Jews is faulty for many reasons. (1) It assumes that the way a country acted in the past was the way they will act in the future. There were many countries that had long term up and down mostly benign relationships with Jews who turned on them. Take Germany as an example (2)That argument ignores that in general the Arab world post WWI has little resemblance to the Arab world before that. There were also much more wars going on in general in the Christian world than in the Muslim world at the time periods being ignored (3)It isn’t much different than the Zionist viewpoint during the heyday of pre state Zionism. (1910-1948) Being that at that point of time Jewish blood was being spilled like water and Jews faced serious discrimination even in the more benign countries (With Germany being the exception for most of that time period) the idea that only if we have our own country will we be safe made sense. Today the anti-Zionists adopted that same view in reverse saying if we DON’T have our own country we will be safe (4)It ignores the many times that Chazal say that in the period right before Mosiach , Klall Yisroel will suffer terribly from Yismoel. See for example the Pireky D’Rabbi Eliezer about the birth of Yismoel.

    in reply to: Daylight savings, DOGE and Musk #2338908
    smerel
    Participant

    Elon Musk is not an elected official so he has limited ability to make proposals that will get done.

    It isn’t only frum people who don’t want it getting light at 9:00 in the winter. It is also a major nuisance for dairy farmers because if their cows wake up so late in the day it means they will have difficulty getting the milk to the market that day. non diary framers don’t like it either because the dew doesn’t defrost until later in the day making them wait around later in the day to start work (but they aren’t doing that much work in the winter to put a major fuss)

    If standard time becomes year round it will be a major problem for Bochurim summer bein hazaminim when the second zman krias shma will get as early as 8;00. Baale Batim aren’t going to like 7:30 Shabbos Shachris either

    in reply to: Adopt a dog. It’s a chesed. #2330395
    smerel
    Participant

    Not so simple in halacha to own a dog. Even if it were when people think of “chesed” in terms of owning dogs you see why in haskafa people are so opposed to it.

    (My father asked one of the major poskim in the US 50 years about owning a dog as a pet. He said that the Mishna and later sources in halacha who say you aren’t allowed to own a dog aren’t referring to American domesticated dogs but an Erlicher Yid does not have pet dogs. Before you start spewing your daas baal habos about that realize that you don’t reach his toenails in Torah knowledge)

    in reply to: “Kollel” and “Full-Time Learners” #2328782
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>Never do we find that Chazal collected from people or raised donations for the Yeshivos or for the Gedolim or for the Dayonim or for the Marbitzei Torah or for any position of Torah leadership or for anyone else.

    Firstly I don’t think this statement is true. Who do you think was supporting the educational system set in place by Yehoshua ben Gamla? Certainly not the parents. It was made because those who had no father to teach them Torah weren’t learning anything.

    Yissocher and Zevulan predate even that.

    But we will put that aside and ask the oppisite. From the community that claims to oppose supporting Lomdey Torah and claims to believe that Talmidey Chachomim should have their own source of income, why has that community been such an abject failure when it come to living up to it’s own ideals? Where are the respected Talmidey Chachomim in that community who are self supporting TODAY? Why do laymen of that very community with all their talk about the value for being self supporting and not taking from others also contact elder planning lawyers to make sure it isn’t their assets that are drained if they end up in nursing homes?

    Are there ANY members of that community who actually follow the Rambam of working only three hours a day and learning the rest? How about even even the oppisite? LEARNING three hours a day and working the rest? I do agree that if someone could make a living in three hours a day and learn the rest it would be better than learning and being supported or taking government assistance for most people. But as the early Achronim point out on the Rambam , in real life almost no one actually does or has the realistic theoretical ability to do so?

    smerel
    Participant

    This would depend on where the shul is located and what is the nature of the shul. If it is an area that has other shuls , is not a minyan factory and was made for people who very much value a certain decorum during tefilah then it is their shul and they have the right to want a certain atmosphere during tefila. They are correct to say that if that is too difficult for someone then this is not the right shul for them. Begrudging them of that right is also not loving and accepting other Jews.

    Without responding to everything the OP said, unlike the opinion of his wife, the Beis Hamikdash and even the Har HaBayis also had a dress code that they were VERY strict about. So if anything it would prove the opposite.

    That said, I’m happy to see any Jew enter my shul. I even miss the days of when completely and obviously secular Jews would come to shul for Yizkor or to say Kaddish. Unless there is a policy against it please come to shul no matter how you are capable of dressing. I’ve davened in the frummest and most kanoish of places and seen people come in all forms of dress. No one ever says anything. Unless you are dressed offensive it’s safe to assume no one will.

    smerel
    Participant

    “Even the classic “proofs” for Orthodox Judaism a la Rabbis Kelemen, Gottlieb, and Mechanic are passe. As an article in the Jewish Action a few months ago put it” “Proofs for the Torah?! That is so 90’s!””
    I don’t know that they were even a good idea in the 90’s. I think they’re more stuck in the 60’s and 70’s when there were socially liberal, hippie baalei teshuva. That’s over. If they want to have any success today, I need to go after the weird kid with no friends who gets made fun of for wearing a MAGA hat in public. B’zman hazeh, those are the only people who are going to give up a secular life for an extremely rigid religion.

    It would be more accurate to say that people aren’t giving up hedonistic lifestyles no matter how much you try to reason with them. I googled this alleged recent Jewish Action article but could not find it on their website. If it does exist I’m confident it was not written in the same context as presented here The argument of “proofs of Torah don’t work” is not stuck in the 60s and 70s . That mindset is about as old as Judaism itself. Ever since then in free societies like the US people claimed that Orthodox Judaism has no answers so as truth seekers who did their own independent research they can not avoid coming to the conclusion that whatever was believed by the intelligentsia in the time and place they happened to have been was the ultimate truth. It made no difference what that belief actually was and what nonsense it is considered today. In not free societies they joined activist political and social movements who falsely promised the world will be a utopia when they take over

    smerel
    Participant

    >>>Kiruv workers are paid. Can we follow the money?

    It’s very rare for anyone to make a parnosha off Kiruv. No kollel yungerman would consider being a Kiruv worker as a future career option. Best case scenario it is a part time job. The few who do make a parnosha off Kiruv are very talented people who would have a let easier ways of making money without it . I know two children of people who were major figures in the Kiruv world. Neither of them are are in Kiruv themselves as Kiruv is not an industry you can hire your children in and anyway there isn’t enough business for them anymore . Their father’s institutions are largely defunct today. Neither of these people are known to be more talented than their fathers are. Both are mega millionaires. One of them started such a successful business that he was once featured on the cover of a major business magazine.

    smerel
    Participant

    Most people who claim to be Jewish but aren’t halachically Jewish aren’t interested in Kiruv organizations to begin with. In general the Kiruv movement no longer has as many interested customers as they once did because secular American Jews younger than forty don’t identify as being Jewish like they did in the heyday of the Kiruv movement. Or if they do identify as being Jewish, their “Judaism” is little more than the official position of the Democratic party (that they call tikkun olam) with some holidays thrown in. Their focus and success even in the US is mostly with Israeli immigrants. The Kiruv groups also use techniques to ensure the people they are dealing with are halachically Jewish. They do not take everyone claiming to be Jewish at their word. Of sad and ironic note is that if someone claims to be Jewish and has a Jewish name like Goldberg they assume the person is NOT halachically Jewish until further verification whereas if the person has a clearly non-Jewish last name like Hendricks there is a larger likelihood the person is in fact halachically Jewish.

    in reply to: 0 vs 612 #2321390
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>So the zionists who scream and yell at those who disagree or dont support zionism, thrive on conflict (the holocaust and Oct 7), and curse NK, we are supposed to not hate them,

    This is just another NK caricature of a made up enemy. “Zionists” do not run around screaming and yelling at non-Zionists. They do not look to attend anti-Zionist events to fight with anti-Zionist. etc. They do not thrive off the holocaust and Oct 7 (I’m not even sure what that is supposed to mean) I will not respond further to someone who is so consumed by hate that he is removed from reality.

    If you have specific common incidents of “zionists” looking to stir up hate similar to the way the NK speaks at their pro Hamas rallies then I will address them if you tell me that you are looking for an answer and not just an excuse to spew more accusation about the “zionists”

    in reply to: 0 vs 612 #2321125
    smerel
    Participant

    Another general point to realize is that (like Chazal say about Hashem himself) people are much more accepting of the faults of people who are humble and mind their own business than people who are arrogant, self righteous, always angry, always looking to bad mouth others who thrive on conflict, aggression and incitement etc. The latter describes the NK. That is part of why they are hated so much.

    in reply to: 0 vs 612 #2321122
    smerel
    Participant

    The Neturei Karta and co are reshaim because they very openly rile up anti-semitic crowds and use their “Judaism” to give a hechser on people like Sinwar and their behavior. It isn’t hard to find them speaking out in support and praise of groups and people that even in the non-Jewish world are considered mass murders. They preach a new Torah that Palestinian Nationalism is Judaism. And unlike most IDF soldiers they can not even claim to be tinokos s’nisba. Although Rav Yaakov Kamenetzky said the NK is Rodfim over forty years ago, as someone who grew up reading their literature they weren’t anywhere nearly as radical back then.

    in reply to: Question for those who don’t think Charedim should join the IDF #2320420
    smerel
    Participant

    >>>the Torah that kosher Jews learn protects Jews but does not protect rashayim.

    Uh…. There are at least two pesukim in the Torah that say otherwise. By Sedom and the Meraglim . But that is just another part of Torah that doesn’t fit with the religion the extreme anti-Zionists preach. It is far from the only one

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 663 total)