ujm

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 501 through 550 (of 4,289 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What Happened To the Forum I Loved so Well? #2189110
    ujm
    Participant

    Neville: You’ll also need to change it to a fictitious email in order to prevent yourself from doing a password reset.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2188835
    ujm
    Participant

    N0m: The old Flatbush eiruv from the 1970s was built by the MO and the MO were the only ones that used it. Rav Moshe was opposed to it.

    in reply to: What Happened To the Forum I Loved so Well? #2188745
    ujm
    Participant

    Neville: You remember illini07? He was from the pre-CR days when there was only the main site. When the CR started in the summer of 2008 he was from the first posters here. (In fact, his last post was directed to me.)

    Any old timer will surely remember this classical thread:

    Should pro-freikeit commentors be given a voice?

    Eight highly active far-left-wing posters [from a Torah perspective] (all of whom were active on both the main site and the new CR) were identified in the OP. And they weren’t the only ones.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2188608
    ujm
    Participant

    The Modern Orthodox built an Eruv in Flatbush, that only the MO used, during Rav Moshe’s lifetime. In the 1970s, about.

    in reply to: A Chief Rabbi Attends the Coronation in a Church? #2188212
    ujm
    Participant

    You can do avoda zora for darkei shalom?! You have to die rather than do avoda zora!

    in reply to: What Happened To the Forum I Loved so Well? #2188139
    ujm
    Participant

    ubiq,: I’m glad to see that you still have that Pintele Yid in you.

    in reply to: What Happened To the Forum I Loved so Well? #2188010
    ujm
    Participant

    Neville: Every Ben Torah has a little bit Joseph in them.

    in reply to: Lag baomer hadlaka #2187997
    ujm
    Participant

    Kiryas Yoel

    in reply to: A Chief Rabbi Attends the Coronation in a Church? #2187989
    ujm
    Participant

    A July 29, 1981 JTA news wire states that Chief Rabbi Immanuel Jakobovits did NOT attend the church service wedding of Charles and Diana.

    in reply to: A Chief Rabbi Attends the Coronation in a Church? #2187959
    ujm
    Participant

    mentsch: This isn’t an isolated incident. This same Chief Rabbi has in the past expressed public support for toeiva practitioners as well as having taken other positions anathema to the Torah.

    in reply to: What Happened To the Forum I Loved so Well? #2187946
    ujm
    Participant

    Neville: Thank you for this post. You have said everything that needs to be said.

    And welcome back.

    in reply to: A Chief Rabbi Attends the Coronation in a Church? #2187917
    ujm
    Participant

    DaMoshe: Without addressing your claim, since it is irrelevant to this case for the following reason, the official invitations sent to everyone authorized to attend the coronation specifically says:

    “… The Earl Marshall is directed to invite Mr. John Doe to be present… “

    (Replace John Doe with the invitees name.)

    It does NOT whatsoever “command” the invitee to attend.

    in reply to: A Chief Rabbi Attends the Coronation in a Church? #2187753
    ujm
    Participant

    mentsch1: Yes, it absolutely is hard to believe that this was done by many chashuv rabbanim throughout history, because it simply never was. No chashuv rabbanim have attended a Christian prayer service in a Christian church where they bow down to yushke and pray to him. No matter what the reason or excuse. No matter if it was the King himself who directly ordered him to or not.

    Do you remember the story of Chana and her seven sons? Jews do not enter the sanctuary of a church for a prayer to Avoda Zora.

    Throughout history Yidden have rather given up their lives and allowed themselves to be killed rather than do such a horrendous thing.

    in reply to: A Chief Rabbi Attends the Coronation in a Church? #2187699
    ujm
    Participant

    The British coronation service was in the main sanctuary of the church.

    in reply to: A Chief Rabbi Attends the Coronation in a Church? #2187692
    ujm
    Participant

    smerel: That’s untrue. They have not been doing this for 150 years. It is a recent thing.

    Additionally, the prohibition is to even enter a church when there are no services. But the coronation as well as weddings and funerals are official Christian church service, replete with Christian prayers and bowing to yushke. It is not a secular service.

    in reply to: King Charles and Queen Camilla #2187671
    ujm
    Participant

    Camilla was coronated today, with her official title henceforth being Queen Camilla, and styled “Her Majesty The Queen”.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2187492
    ujm
    Participant

    DaMoshe: Even according to the shittas you quoted, you cannot disregard right is left, etc. You cannot decide to ignore it and not question the Rov. You must ask him for clarification based on your objection. And follow right is left, etc. if he continues to insist that you do.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2187163
    ujm
    Participant

    hoo hoo: What’s Brooklyn have to do with it, regarding this, that you’re differentiating Brooklyn?

    Brooklyn, Queens, Nassau and Suffolk are all part of the same one land mass.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2187035
    ujm
    Participant

    How’s this different than the Boro Park Eruv built 24 years ago or the Flatbush Eruv built 50 years ago?

    in reply to: You should get a dog. #2186772
    ujm
    Participant

    Chinese people eat dog meat.

    in reply to: info travel restrictions #2186369
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: Stem cell donation #2185168
    ujm
    Participant

    What does the donor lose or what is the cost to him (not financial, other)?

    in reply to: King Charles and Queen Camilla #2185116
    ujm
    Participant

    BTW, even under the original plan when she got married the Palace announced that Camilla “intended” to use the title Duchess rather than Queen upon Charles ascension, when had they stuck to that intention Camilla would still have legally been Queen. The announced intention was only that Camilla would only publicly advertise herself as duchess even though she*was* Queen. After the ascension she immediately advertised herself with her higher title of Queen Consort, per Queen Elizabeth’s “fervent desire” that she announced about a year before her passing. And now with the coronation the Palace is simply calling her Queen Camilla, without reference to Consort. Which is in line with how traditionally the British Queen Consorts have not used Consort as part of their title as Queen.

    in reply to: Lo sichanem #2184916
    ujm
    Participant

    CS, again, Rambam very clearly and explicitly declares Christianity to be avoda zora for goyim.

    in reply to: Lo sichanem #2184748
    ujm
    Participant

    CS, and, as i mentioned, rambam specifically writes that Christianity, whether you call it shituf or not, is avoda zora.

    in reply to: Lo sichanem #2184746
    ujm
    Participant

    CS, the Noda B’Yehuda wires that shituf is avoda zora even for a Goy.

    in reply to: Lo sichanem #2184702
    ujm
    Participant

    CS, Christians are akum, worshipping avoda zora. It says so specifically in Rambam.

    in reply to: Shabbos dips #2184700
    ujm
    Participant

    Fish juice.

    in reply to: info travel restrictions #2184451
    ujm
    Participant

    There are no covid vaccination requirements. You can be totally unvaccinated.

    in reply to: King Charles and Queen Camilla #2184441
    ujm
    Participant

    The one excellent outcome, certainly, is that the adulteress Diana never got the undeserved title of Queen that she strongly coveted.

    in reply to: Elementary Mathematical Equation #2184403
    ujm
    Participant

    Meno, most math exam questions, whether in elementary school, high school or in university, are “follow the rules” problems.

    in reply to: Teen Violence in Lakewood #2184095
    ujm
    Participant

    College today is 1,000 times worse than 50 years ago, when the Gedolei Yisroel, even back then, said it is forbidden.

    in reply to: What are your thoughts about Kennedy?? #2184071
    ujm
    Participant

    Jackk: Hilary was a bigger political nobody when she used her last name and husband to run for the Senate.

    in reply to: What are your thoughts about Kennedy?? #2183742
    ujm
    Participant

    This Kennedy is a lot better than Ted Kennedy ever was.

    in reply to: Teen Violence in Lakewood #2183604
    ujm
    Participant

    Hadofi: You’re agreeing with the point. As the girls get more secular education than the boys, and yet there’s no evidence boys have a greater OTD issue than girls, there’s no correlation between less secular ed and OTD.

    in reply to: Teen Violence in Lakewood #2183289
    ujm
    Participant

    interjection: very high rate is an exaggeration. But your point about girls does refute the premise that the fault is about too much Limudei/too little secular.

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2183212
    ujm
    Participant

    Dear N0m: The point of my list was to respond to another Yid here asking that other potential candidates be named.

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2183187
    ujm
    Participant

    Someday: Are you able to identify which four you’re referring to, as I cannot ascertain whom you are referencing, or thereby address your issues.

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2183100
    ujm
    Participant

    CS, was your comment about the Reform that you believe the Reform are starting to do more Mitzvos because of Lubavitch?

    in reply to: reb shayala brother #2183098
    ujm
    Participant

    You can go to the kever of the Chofetz Chaim’s Rebbetzin in Queens as well.

    in reply to: Lo sichanem #2183097
    ujm
    Participant

    Avira, Yasher Koach. You’ve said everything that needs to be said on this.

    in reply to: What are your thoughts about Kennedy?? #2183050
    ujm
    Participant

    You didn’t hear about the curse the Rov put on the Kennedy family?

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2182953
    ujm
    Participant

    Someday: Obviously we disagree. You haven’t identified whom you’re referring to, so I can’t individually address your allegations. But, I should add, the first two I forgot to specify which Rabbonim with those titles I was referring to, which I suspect you may have misidentified (and, thus, you’ll withdraw your comment in regards to). In both cases I was referring to the Rabbonim who assumed those titles already before the Holocaust.

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2182932
    ujm
    Participant

    CS: “I’m just wondering if anyone else has another current leader in mind as a suitable candidate.”

    If by current you’re referring to those who lived in the lifetime of the Lubavitcher Rebbe, here are some suitable candidates:

    Satmar Rebbe
    Gerrer Rebbe
    Chofetz Chaim
    Rav Chaim Ozer Grodzinski
    Rav Elchonon Wasserman
    Chazon Ish
    Steipler
    Rav Ahron
    Rav Moshe
    Rav Hutner
    Rav Pam
    Rav Shach
    Rav Elyashiv
    Rav Chaim
    Rav Gershon Edelstein

    in reply to: Elementary Mathematical Equation #2182923
    ujm
    Participant

    AAQ: How would you express the following equation more precisely (or is it simple enough, already)?

    3-3×6+2

    in reply to: Yeshivish Clothing #2182788
    ujm
    Participant

    Avram, Philly is really a bit NY-like? It’s been a long time since I was there, but I believe it was in suburban Philadelphia where we were behind more than a handful of cars waiting for the light, and when it went green the car in front for some reason took almost 30 seconds to start moving. And not a single car blew their horn. They all waited like they had all the time in the world. It impressed me so much I still remember it decades later.

    in reply to: Elementary Mathematical Equation #2182764
    ujm
    Participant

    Apparently you can have a legitimate machlokes even in mathematics.

    in reply to: Yeshivish Clothing #2182680
    ujm
    Participant

    If driving customs are based on local minhagim, how is anyone not from the area to know what the local driving customs are, given that there are thousands of different jurisdictions in the United States alone, with most people coming from any one particular area but potentially driving through many other areas outside their own town or city.

    in reply to: Elementary Mathematical Equation #2182446
    ujm
    Participant

    What is 2x/3y-1 if x=9 and y=2 ?

    in reply to: Elementary Mathematical Equation #2182445
    ujm
    Participant

    Dr. Pepper: …”a/b/c. Is it (a/b)/c or a/(b/c)?”

    What logic could argue for a/(b/c)? (a/b)/c is following your original equation left-to-right.

    In the OP’s example you could invoke left to right. Or you could invoke the basis of prioritizing the touching rule. The left to right only became prevalent with the advent of calculators. Prior to the widespread use of calculators (i.e. within the last less than hundred years) the generally accepted convention was to prioritize touching — such as 2(2+2). Of course that’s only applicable where they otherwise hold equal priority, such as multiplication and division.

Viewing 50 posts - 501 through 550 (of 4,289 total)